Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  2
Likes Likes:  38
Dislikes Dislikes:  1
Results 1 to 15 of 251

Thread: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,401
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    772
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    For all this just fight talk about Jacobs nobody, not one person has listed anyone that wants to fight him. Oh, fight Lee, has Lee said he wants to fight Jacobs? So he should just make that meaningless fight how?

    GGG owes him, of course you take the Canelo money and have him move up. But is anyone paying attention to who he is talking about fighting now. Miguel f'n Cotto. Yes, I'm dead serious. Miguel f'n Cotto. He wants his old arse to move up.

    It's getting f'n laughable how everyone blames the guys that want the hard fights and excuses the guys who keep searching soft.
    Couldn't like this on my phone, so I have to post to agree with you.
    Of Course , @Master would prefer that GGG "improves his legacy" by fighting a few meaningless bums instead of giving Jacobs the rematch he deserves.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    813
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    435
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    For all this just fight talk about Jacobs nobody, not one person has listed anyone that wants to fight him. Oh, fight Lee, has Lee said he wants to fight Jacobs? So he should just make that meaningless fight how?

    GGG owes him, of course you take the Canelo money and have him move up. But is anyone paying attention to who he is talking about fighting now. Miguel f'n Cotto. Yes, I'm dead serious. Miguel f'n Cotto. He wants his old arse to move up.

    It's getting f'n laughable how everyone blames the guys that want the hard fights and excuses the guys who keep searching soft.
    Couldn't like this on my phone, so I have to post to agree with you.
    Of Course , @Master would prefer that GGG "improves his legacy" by fighting a few meaningless bums instead of giving Jacobs the rematch he deserves.
    Yeah, he does love a good legacy fight against guy like Wade and Monroe

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    700
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    For all this just fight talk about Jacobs nobody, not one person has listed anyone that wants to fight him. Oh, fight Lee, has Lee said he wants to fight Jacobs? So he should just make that meaningless fight how?

    GGG owes him, of course you take the Canelo money and have him move up. But is anyone paying attention to who he is talking about fighting now. Miguel f'n Cotto. Yes, I'm dead serious. Miguel f'n Cotto. He wants his old arse to move up.

    It's getting f'n laughable how everyone blames the guys that want the hard fights and excuses the guys who keep searching soft.
    Couldn't like this on my phone, so I have to post to agree with you.
    Of Course , @Master would prefer that GGG "improves his legacy" by fighting a few meaningless bums instead of giving Jacobs the rematch he deserves.

    At this point I'm actually hoping it's a scam to get peoples hopes low enough a BJS fight seems acceptable. Considering what BJS has done in his career and how he has looked the last few years our hopes have to be pretty damn low to accept a GGG/BJS fight.

    Calling out yet another smaller older guy in Cotto is pure weak sauce. The finest of weak sauces. I really want to like GGG but I can't get behind a guy that has a rep as a take on a comers guy but so clearly and deliberately chases the easiest money. For years too.

    I get everyone chases money, but most get judged for calling out smaller older guys.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    690
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London

    A Cotto fight for either guy is embarrassing. Even at his absolute best, 160 is way too big for him. And he is nowhere near his best. I will be extremely disappointed in GGG if he takes a Cotto fight.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,502
    Mentioned
    1698 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3117
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London

    GGG took on Jacobs before and would take him on again. If I was GGG I would make sure that Jacobs does comply with the after weight limit which he reneged on last time they fought.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,067
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1822
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London

    Golovkin is a money hungry path of least resistance guy and has been for years. Jacobs, a guy who's chosen vocation in life is to fight, would be better served by not fighting

    Just brilliant.

    Whats wrong with him fighting Lemieux, Charlo, N'Dam/Murata? Yeah yeah I know, I beat him, we're ducking him and who gives a fuck about them. His alternative?

    Last time I checked, posting on social media didn't improve rankings and doesn't pay very well, for most.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,401
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    772
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    Golovkin is a money hungry path of least resistance guy and has been for years. Jacobs, a guy who's chosen vocation in life is to fight, would be better served by not fighting

    Just brilliant.

    Whats wrong with him fighting Lemieux, Charlo, N'Dam/Murata? Yeah yeah I know, I beat him, we're ducking him and who gives a fuck about them. His alternative?

    Last time I checked, posting on social media didn't improve rankings and doesn't pay very well, for most.
    "Last time I checked, posting on social media didn't improve rankings and doesn't pay very well, for most."
    Well it paved the way for the likes of Haye, Fury, Bellew, McGregor and others to make more money than they should've done.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,067
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1822
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    Golovkin is a money hungry path of least resistance guy and has been for years. Jacobs, a guy who's chosen vocation in life is to fight, would be better served by not fighting

    Just brilliant.

    Whats wrong with him fighting Lemieux, Charlo, N'Dam/Murata? Yeah yeah I know, I beat him, we're ducking him and who gives a fuck about them. His alternative?

    Last time I checked, posting on social media didn't improve rankings and doesn't pay very well, for most.
    "Last time I checked, posting on social media didn't improve rankings and doesn't pay very well, for most."
    Well it paved the way for the likes of Haye, Fury, Bellew, McGregor and others to make more money than they should've done.
    "For most"

    There are exceptions. Haye, McGregor. You're not having Bellew or Fury though. Fury earned his shot legitimately and no amount of social media nonsense has boosted his pay cheque as far as I can see. Bellew was the opponant. He earned well but Haye was the driver and lets not forget, he played his part in making it viable by actually fighting and chinning Makabu.

    If mouthing off on social media was a sure fire thing, Charlie Z would have had his shot at Joshua by now.

    Jacobs is a fine fighter and good man no doubt, but when it comes to mass appeal and pulling power, he's closer to Zelenoff than he is Haye or McGregor.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    700
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London

    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    Golovkin is a money hungry path of least resistance guy and has been for years. Jacobs, a guy who's chosen vocation in life is to fight, would be better served by not fighting

    Just brilliant.

    Whats wrong with him fighting Lemieux, Charlo, N'Dam/Murata? Yeah yeah I know, I beat him, we're ducking him and who gives a fuck about them. His alternative?

    Last time I checked, posting on social media didn't improve rankings and doesn't pay very well, for most.
    You list Lemieux completely ignoring Lemieux already turned him down, wouldn't even negotiate, same as GGG and BJS. But go ahead, blame the guy that wants to fight. It's popular these days to blame the guy that wants to fight.

    Charlo is GGGs mandatory, GGG doesn't want to fight him either. Charlo's fault right?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    700
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London

    It's f'n sad people feel comfortable just saying shit no matter how much BS it quite clearly is "Fight Lemieux", Lemieux said no.

    People will say whatever to blame the guys that actually want to fight. Like when GGG was ducking Ward "Ward is inactive" yeah, no shit, because GGG won't fight him!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    20,067
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1822
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saunders v Monroe 16/9/17 London

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Memphis View Post
    Golovkin is a money hungry path of least resistance guy and has been for years. Jacobs, a guy who's chosen vocation in life is to fight, would be better served by not fighting

    Just brilliant.

    Whats wrong with him fighting Lemieux, Charlo, N'Dam/Murata? Yeah yeah I know, I beat him, we're ducking him and who gives a fuck about them. His alternative?

    Last time I checked, posting on social media didn't improve rankings and doesn't pay very well, for most.
    You list Lemieux completely ignoring Lemieux already turned him down, wouldn't even negotiate, same as GGG and BJS. But go ahead, blame the guy that wants to fight. It's popular these days to blame the guy that wants to fight.

    Charlo is GGGs mandatory, GGG doesn't want to fight him either. Charlo's fault right?
    Oh dear. You've allowed the GGG red mist to fall again and you've missed the point entirely. I'll indulge you. Post your evidence that Jacobs approached Lemeiux and or BJS Saunders and they knocked him back.

    Point being, and the point I was responding to. Jacobs needs to fight, NOT fighting, is NOT going to work out for Jacobs because.....

    No one in the grand scheme of things cares about Danny Jacobs. He's the cancer guy who got steamrollered by Pirog, won a title against a guy BJS hammered in minutes and the guy who gave GGG a better fight than most expected, which some managed to convert into a win. He's very good, but he's no star, which means he ain't dictating shit.

    No, you are quite right, it's all GGG's fault that we dont have a Charlo fight already rubber stamped for December. I propose Charlo takes to social media to shout about it whilst fighting no one in the meantime!

    Jacobs V Charlo then? I assume since both men so desperately want to fight and fight the best, this is a no brainer. Actually Im surprised and a little disappointed that you're not giving both men shit for not making this obvious match up, given that everyone else in the World is shit scared of the pair of them.

    Great fight, and you still get to slag off GGG before during and after, win win.
    When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough

    Charley Burley

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-17-2017, 12:14 AM
  2. Can Monroe reinvent himself ?
    By Beanz in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-17-2013, 08:16 PM
  3. quigg v monroe
    By erics44 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-17-2012, 08:44 PM
  4. anyone going to quig monroe?
    By erics44 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-13-2012, 03:25 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing