Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  4
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Another Heavyweight divison!?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    813
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    429
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Another Heavyweight divison!?

    I think most people are sizist which is why those smaller divisions don’t do big business. The two most recognisable people in Boxing history (arguably sports history) are both Heavyweight boxers (Tyson and Ali)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    560
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Another Heavyweight divison!?

    Don't need a Super-Heavy division. Less weight divisions would be a good start tho. 108 and 105 could go. 115 even tho it's stacked at the moment. 122, 130, 140, 154 & 168 could all disappear.
    They live, We sleep

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Is the Super-Middleweight divison...
    By Hughesd in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-22-2009, 10:14 AM
  2. The Best Chins In Each Divison
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 01-12-2008, 06:03 PM
  3. Super-Bantamweight Divison
    By Hughesd in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-02-2007, 02:14 PM
  4. Todays Lack Luster Heavyweight Divison
    By Lords Gym in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 06-15-2006, 10:28 AM
  5. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-24-2006, 10:51 AM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing