gerald mcclellan vs tommy hearns who wins

[ICB]

Tommy Hearns had unbelivable punching power just like Gerald and a great chin. Tommy also had much faster hands to deliver quick and powerful shots. Most people forget about tommy having great boxing ability and being able to stay on the outside and wear his opponents down. Gerald usually went in from the first round and tried to land a big shot which he done well. I think tommy would stay on the outside moving around gerald and wear him down. Gerald would then start to slow and tommy would hit him with a big shot around about the 6th round which would knock gerald out.

what do you think would have happened Majesty

hearns never had great chin if barkley could catch hearns and ko him im sure gerald could

[ICB]

if you have only watched 4 fights of mcclelan. how many hearns fights have you seen

i only need to see 4 of them because most of his fights never went past 1st round anyways tommy hearns fights ive seen are marvin hagler one both of barkley ones. both of fights with sugar ray leonard and one with duran

[stavros693000]

hearns at welterweight whoops everone

[WWatt]

McClellan had the heaviest of hands for an MW, Hearns had the weakest of chins for an MW.

[dennis]

i think thats a bit harsh saying he had the weakest chin becasue he didnt

[dennis]

hearns also had a lot of early round KO'S. look on boxrec

[ICB]

i think thats a bit harsh saying he had the weakest chin becasue he didnt

if hearns would of had granite chin he would of been almost unbeatable but thats thing he lacked was great chin thats why he didnt beat leonard in first fight or hagler in there thriller or barkley

[ICB]

hearns also had a lot of early round KO'S. look on boxrec

yea i know i dont watch all there fights i only watch important ones like duran hagler barkley leonard ect and few others

[dennis]

At the end of the day thommy hearns is a legend. The fight with mclellan never happened and everyone has there opinion and i respect that. so u think mclelan would have won and i think hearns. fair enough.

we are talking about a fight at middleweight.

what about if mcllelan moved down welter which is were hearns was best at.

[dennis]

i think mclellan could have been a middleweight legend if he never suffered that terrible tragety abainst benn. imagine the fights that could have happened.

[ICB]

At the end of the day thommy hearns is a legend. The fight with mclellan never happened and everyone has there opinion and i respect that. so u think mclelan would have won and i think hearns. fair enough.

we are talking about a fight at middleweight.

what about if mcllelan moved down welter which is were hearns was best at.

i dont think gerald was ever welterweight in his pro career

[ICB]

i think mclellan could have been a middleweight legend if he never suffered that terrible tragety abainst benn. imagine the fights that could have happened.

yep toney roy jones eubank collins and many more maybe even calzaghe vs gerald

[dennis]

no. i dont thik he was ever a welter but what do u think wouldnt have been the out come. hearns vs mcllelan at welter

[ICB]

no. i dont thik he was ever a welter but what do u think wouldnt have been the out come. hearns vs mcllelan at welter

hearns because i think it would be too light for gerald

[dennis]

i agree. Maybe at middle it would be a different fight.

at welter hearns wins.
at middle mcllelan

do we agree with something