Boxers vs Fighters..

[Dannl99]

I think Hearns would have beaten Floyd, and I do rank Floyd very highly. But Hearns' reach, power, speed and boxing skill I think would be too much for Floyd. Plus Floyd didn't have the power to really hurt Hearns like Leonard did.

I agree, styles makes fights and Hearns would've beat Floyd. But Floyd was a much smaller guy.

This is true. Floyd started at 130 and I think Hearns started at 147, so I guess it really isn't a fair fight per se.

[Master]

I think Hearns would have beaten Floyd, and I do rank Floyd very highly. But Hearns' reach, power, speed and boxing skill I think would be too much for Floyd. Plus Floyd didn't have the power to really hurt Hearns like Leonard did.

I agree, styles makes fights and Hearns would've beat Floyd. But Floyd was a much smaller guy.

This is true. Floyd started at 130 and I think Hearns started at 147, so I guess it really isn't a fair fight per se.

Floyd would not have fought him, he would have been too busy fighting Baldimor and Judah to fit into his busy schedule.

[imp]

Floyd is tiny..Hearns is huge.

In a same weight dream situation why wouldn't Floyd figure Hearns out like Leonard did and box his ears off?

(That's the pretty boy version by the way).

[Primo Carnera]

I think Hearns would have beaten Floyd, and I do rank Floyd very highly. But Hearns' reach, power, speed and boxing skill I think would be too much for Floyd. Plus Floyd didn't have the power to really hurt Hearns like Leonard did.

I agree, styles makes fights and Hearns would've beat Floyd. But Floyd was a much smaller guy.

This is true. Floyd started at 130 and I think Hearns started at 147, so I guess it really isn't a fair fight per se.

Floyd would not have fought him, he would have been too busy fighting Baldimor and Judah to fit into his busy schedule.

Well ok, you can stay in denial, but whoever he fought he fought and guess what, he WON every single fucking time.
So he's not the GOAT, is that a reason to constantly dig at him? Pathetic really. Accept that he was the best of his generation, respect his skill in the ring, even if you think he's a cunt out of the ring.
Who fought and beat better than he has in the last 15 years? Yep, thought as much.

[Master]

I think Hearns would have beaten Floyd, and I do rank Floyd very highly. But Hearns' reach, power, speed and boxing skill I think would be too much for Floyd. Plus Floyd didn't have the power to really hurt Hearns like Leonard did.

I agree, styles makes fights and Hearns would've beat Floyd. But Floyd was a much smaller guy.

This is true. Floyd started at 130 and I think Hearns started at 147, so I guess it really isn't a fair fight per se.

Floyd would not have fought him, he would have been too busy fighting Baldimor and Judah to fit into his busy schedule.

Well ok, you can stay in denial, but whoever he fought he fought and guess what, he WON every single fucking time.
So he's not the GOAT, is that a reason to constantly dig at him? Pathetic really. Accept that he was the best of his generation, respect his skill in the ring, even if you think he's a cunt out of the ring.
Who fought and beat better than he has in the last 15 years? Yep, thought as much.

Manny Pac has achieved better considering the weight he started. The zero means nothing if you do not challenge yourself and just stay in the comfort zone.

[Primo Carnera]

I think Hearns would have beaten Floyd, and I do rank Floyd very highly. But Hearns' reach, power, speed and boxing skill I think would be too much for Floyd. Plus Floyd didn't have the power to really hurt Hearns like Leonard did.

I agree, styles makes fights and Hearns would've beat Floyd. But Floyd was a much smaller guy.

This is true. Floyd started at 130 and I think Hearns started at 147, so I guess it really isn't a fair fight per se.

Floyd would not have fought him, he would have been too busy fighting Baldimor and Judah to fit into his busy schedule.

Well ok, you can stay in denial, but whoever he fought he fought and guess what, he WON every single fucking time.
So he's not the GOAT, is that a reason to constantly dig at him? Pathetic really. Accept that he was the best of his generation, respect his skill in the ring, even if you think he's a cunt out of the ring.
Who fought and beat better than he has in the last 15 years? Yep, thought as much.

Manny Pac has achieved better considering the weight he started. The zero means nothing if you do not challenge yourself and just stay in the comfort zone.

And who beat Manny Pac? Don't chat shit mate.

[Master]

I think Hearns would have beaten Floyd, and I do rank Floyd very highly. But Hearns' reach, power, speed and boxing skill I think would be too much for Floyd. Plus Floyd didn't have the power to really hurt Hearns like Leonard did.

I agree, styles makes fights and Hearns would've beat Floyd. But Floyd was a much smaller guy.

This is true. Floyd started at 130 and I think Hearns started at 147, so I guess it really isn't a fair fight per se.

Floyd would not have fought him, he would have been too busy fighting Baldimor and Judah to fit into his busy schedule.

Well ok, you can stay in denial, but whoever he fought he fought and guess what, he WON every single fucking time.
So he's not the GOAT, is that a reason to constantly dig at him? Pathetic really. Accept that he was the best of his generation, respect his skill in the ring, even if you think he's a cunt out of the ring.
Who fought and beat better than he has in the last 15 years? Yep, thought as much.

Manny Pac has achieved better considering the weight he started. The zero means nothing if you do not challenge yourself and just stay in the comfort zone.

And who beat Manny Pac? Don't chat shit mate.

Stop acting ignorant. Manny's record is better than Floyds and far more impressive. Manny shone brighter.

[imp]

Even hardcore PAC fans have accepted his place in history Master...just let it go..nothing wrong with 2nd place.

Pac is a future hall of famer..right next to Marquez.

[Primo Carnera]

I think Hearns would have beaten Floyd, and I do rank Floyd very highly. But Hearns' reach, power, speed and boxing skill I think would be too much for Floyd. Plus Floyd didn't have the power to really hurt Hearns like Leonard did.

I agree, styles makes fights and Hearns would've beat Floyd. But Floyd was a much smaller guy.

This is true. Floyd started at 130 and I think Hearns started at 147, so I guess it really isn't a fair fight per se.

Floyd would not have fought him, he would have been too busy fighting Baldimor and Judah to fit into his busy schedule.

Well ok, you can stay in denial, but whoever he fought he fought and guess what, he WON every single fucking time.
So he's not the GOAT, is that a reason to constantly dig at him? Pathetic really. Accept that he was the best of his generation, respect his skill in the ring, even if you think he's a cunt out of the ring.
Who fought and beat better than he has in the last 15 years? Yep, thought as much.

Manny Pac has achieved better considering the weight he started. The zero means nothing if you do not challenge yourself and just stay in the comfort zone.

And who beat Manny Pac? Don't chat shit mate.

Stop acting ignorant. Manny's record is better than Floyds and far more impressive. Manny shone brighter.

Come on Master, for fucks sake.