Walrus is right. Should and could and would and May and Might are called modals, sometimes known as conditionals, depending on which grammar one consults.
Conditionals are used in unreal situations, for example: he could have gotten the job if he had not forgotten to shake the interviewer's hand.
In reality he did not get the job but he simply could have gotten the job IF HE HAD SHAKEN THE INTERVIEWERS HAND. The same goes with the word should which is also a modal or a conditional depending on which grammatical terminology you prefer
Now in the United States treason is punishable by Death. That is definitely the law. There is ample evidence to support that Obama has committed treason on many levels. At no time did I say that someone should not be tried in a court of law by a jury of his or her peers. Now in the strictly conditional sense using the modal should, I think it is quite fair to say that conditionally if a person commits treason then they should AS PRESCRIBED BY US LAW be lynched or if you prefer the modern sense lethally injected I think that is the most modern method being used nowadays as the electric chair may only still be used in Alabama I believe.
A terroristic threat is defined by it's clear personal and willful intent or threat. For example if a person says that he is definitely going to hunt someone down and kill them then that is a terroristic threat.
@
walrus has correctly nailed the grammatical differential on this topic.
Bookmarks