Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
I think Wilder should be more worried about the preferential treatment AJ will get fighting at home. The judges scored it too wide for AJ, so Wilder will not get a decision over here. Also the ref in the Takam fight was premature in his stoppage so think the ref will be with AJ too.

Do not blame Wilder to make demands now for some equity in the fight.
Fine. so put in a counter offer. Like Hearn said, they ain't a fucking charity.
So AJ/Matchroom/Sky have to do the promotion , generate all the interest , bring all the fans in order to make it a stadium fight which generates all the money they want, organize the PPV , and all this so that Wilder can take half?? You and anyone else that says "it should be 50/50 , are fucking dreamers that don't live in the real World.
Tell me, if you were working alongside someone, doing all your work AND most of his work, would YOU be happy if he was on the same Dough?
Also , I don't think the scorecards were too wide. Parker just couldn't get past AJ's jab, and consequently couldn't score any points , therefore he couldn't win any rounds. AJ did enough to control and win the rounds. not by a lot, but that's how Boxing scoring is. As for Takam, yes , it was stopped early, but did it affect the result and did the right person win?
I said some equity, not necessarily 50% but its Wilder's perogative to ask.

Score cards were too wide. AJ hardly landed with the jab for all his "taking control".

Judges had AJ ahead against Wlad when I thought he was losing and although it made no difference the stoppage against Takem shows that protecting the knock out record was important for the organisers of the fight.