GGG vs Vanes

[Spicoli]

The irony is that nearly all are advocating for Golovkin one way or another while recognizing he's been left to sweep up Canelos shit show. It's a no win situation as you're ready for steak but are served potted meat last minute. No one is talking about starving his family ffs and frankly to put it simply..he's better than this just left to be just snatching up coins. After all he WON the fight between the two, well save for the judges. And the only cheat here is Canelo. A bad match is a bad match regardless of the situation and they have collectively let him to dangle in that condition.

Exactly, suggesting GGG still is in need of anything after what boxing has given him is only typical deception.

GGG could have not boxed, he could have stayed in Kazakhstan if he had an average salary he would make 6,588$ a year. And because the Russians wanted to know the lasting effects of nuclear fallout so they intentionally did their nuclear testing above ground in Kazahkstan his family could have stayed there and died of cancer like many other Kazakhs.

GGG has done quite well in boxing, and when you do well in ANYTHING expectations come along with it. Suggesting that is not natural is deception of the most obvious variety.

In fairness I don't think boxing gives much to guys taking punches and we really cannot measure a mans needs. Golovkin merits everything he's earned based on those roots and what he came from and obvious ability. But that scale is a two way street and consumers call mismatches out be they some 4 round John Doe or one of the top p4p fighters today. My biggest problem is I think he's being played a bit and the pushback has already shifted off of Canelo the cheat.

[palmerq]

You guys can be so harsh on golovkin. This is a bollocks fight though, I would

[Master]

You guys can be so harsh on golovkin. This is a bollocks fight though, I would

You would what?

[palmerq]

You guys can be so harsh on golovkin. This is a bollocks fight though, I would

You would what?

It is best not to say

[Alpha]

Does this defense (his 20th of the WBA) equal Hopkin's record?

[palmerq]

Does this defense (his 20th of the WBA) equal Hopkin's record?

Boxrec says it is his 19th.... who to trust I don't know, I guess I could count em :S... also wba is weird and cap with their normal champ and super champ how many of golovkin were normal title defences when the super title was around... same goes for hopkins... all in all it is slightly irellevant. .. but wining 20 in a row for even a fake qorld title is still pretty impressive.

[brocktonblockbust]

disagree, who the hell did he fight, he barely got by Canelo

[Ron Swanson]

The irony is that nearly all are advocating for Golovkin one way or another while recognizing he's been left to sweep up Canelos shit show. It's a no win situation as you're ready for steak but are served potted meat last minute. No one is talking about starving his family ffs and frankly to put it simply..he's better than this just left to be just snatching up coins. After all he WON the fight between the two, well save for the judges. And the only cheat here is Canelo. A bad match is a bad match regardless of the situation and they have collectively let him to dangle in that condition.

Exactly, suggesting GGG still is in need of anything after what boxing has given him is only typical deception.

GGG could have not boxed, he could have stayed in Kazakhstan if he had an average salary he would make 6,588$ a year. And because the Russians wanted to know the lasting effects of nuclear fallout so they intentionally did their nuclear testing above ground in Kazahkstan his family could have stayed there and died of cancer like many other Kazakhs.

GGG has done quite well in boxing, and when you do well in ANYTHING expectations come along with it. Suggesting that is not natural is deception of the most obvious variety.

In fairness I don't think boxing gives much to guys taking punches and we really cannot measure a mans needs. Golovkin merits everything he's earned based on those roots and what he came from and obvious ability. But that scale is a two way street and consumers call mismatches out be they some 4 round John Doe or one of the top p4p fighters today. My biggest problem is I think he's being played a bit and the pushback has already shifted off of Canelo the cheat.

If we didn't know he was waiting on Clanelo next, which means nothing towards who is the best middleweight in the world, I wouldn't care that he's fighting a guy who never made it moving up off a loss and a long layoff. If you look at GGGs CV this is no different than the rest. I just hate a meaningless fight before a meaningless fight when for the first time in so long there are many meaningful fights at the weight.

Jacobs rematch overdue
Charlo waiting
BJS waiting
Derevyanchenko waiting

I don't speak about Clanelo because he's a proven cheat. His ONLY relevance is money. Nobody will forget he is a cheat.