Well actually he didn't lose, you can win after losing the first 5 rounds and being knocked out is the only certain way of losing.
However, i'm not arguing that the theory is wrong just that it's not incontestable. It doesn't guarantee a different result.
Things are more complex than simply starting faster, you can quite simply reverse the logic so Stevenson wins next time by pacing himself in a more efficient manner. A round is scored the exact same, barring knock downs, whether 100 punches or 1 are thrown.
When you watch a race it looks like the strongest finishers are quickening when in fact they are actually slowing down the least. It's deceptive.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
If Jacks strategy was to win on points then surely he takes into account the chance of losing a round down the stretch. Otherwise like with Hopkins against Taylor you are only inviting controversy by giving up half a fight.
I agree that it was in Jack's interest to come on strong, but it was in his interest to do it earlier in the guys hometown and all that.
Stevenson proved he can take him out, but that's the nature of the game. You have to win more of the rounds to nick a decision.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks