I can handle the words just fine and will throw them back and more when the moment calls for it, but I am just suggesting that in the great scheme of things Denilson's approach to debate is strangely less toxic than others and that is why I personally don't mind him. He sticks to the general topic without it becoming a malicious witch hunt.

There is no gang, there really isn't. All there is is a bunch of people who have hung out on a forum and learned to adapt and evolve and thus coexist in relative harmony. The forum speaks for itself in that regard. If that hadn't have happened then we would definitely all be rather odd. Take us for instance, do we fight day in day out? No, of course not. We understand that we don't need to do that. The patterns on the forum are fairly obvious ones.