Quote Originally Posted by Missy
yes. If they don't like it, forgive us.
Missy,

You and any of the other evolution supporters that have posted on this topic, haven't offered a single bit of discussion about the points of evolution. You have been unable to stay on topic, unable to decipher between science and philosophy, and unable to be genuine, only making snide comments.

I haven't made a single insulting or "arrogant" statement. I have been mocked and called names for questioning your beliefs. You act as if I am some fool trying to convince people that santa claus exists when we all know better . The thing is that this topic is supposed to be on the merits of evolution vs creation. Whether someone is a christian or any other religion is not relevant to the topic. This is in genera. Did everything appear in order, capable of supporting life, randomly or by design? You believe that science has proven that random chance is responsible. I believe that there is no science to support that only conjecture and theory. You should be able to easily prove me wrong without ever having to bring up any philosophical argument, or any other non scientific argument.

If you are unable to prove your point, it doesn't mean that my theory is correct. It means that your theory isn't science and is also religion. Is this too difficult to understand Do you think that evolution is possible simply because the Biblical account is unbelievable to you? Proving one wrong doesn't prove the other to be true, it just eliminates that possibility. The problem is that in this topic there aren't very many plausible options. It really comes down to accident or design. Which side you are on isn't neccessarily a religious statement. There are many scientists that don't believe the Bible, but know that there had to be a creator because science has no answers. Don't mischaracterize my position. It's the easy way out. If you objectively weight the facts you will find nothing on your side of the scale. That is my entire argument. And whether I am a religious person or not doesn't affect your lack of evidence. It would seem that by discrediting me you think it lends evidence to your argument. That is a childish reasoning. Let the facts stand on there own. Any chance you can do that? Or are you afraid that if you really examine it you won't like the results?