Quote Originally Posted by body head banger
man those doghouse cats are very biased on theyre opinions concerning the wbc title race...
i dont like it... lol
saying so confidently that peter could beat both toney (ahem ..no) and maskaev (probabbly)
and talking isshhh about b-hop and how winning the heavyweight title against a guy so much larger then him isnt an accompishment.. and i bet my bollocks to a barndance that if they get an interview with b-hop they would kiss his a** like there was no tomorow!! fools!! lol
peace
I wouldn't call my stance towards the WBC biased in any way shape or form. If anything, they are the ones who are biased. Follow the lineage of any of their belts and you'll find they play favorites depending on who carries their belts. WHy was Arce an"interim" champ for so long and never forced to fight the actual champ ? Double sanctioning fees. Why will the WBC allow Maskaev to have another voluntary defense rather than face a mando ? Money again. Look at the lineage of DLH's own WBC 154 title belt and you'll see it is as paper as the contract he signed to fight for it.Why is it that DLH can wait until NEXT MAY to defend that belt against the popponent he chooses ? Same with Mayweather's WBC 140 lb belt that he hedl forever and never was forced to defend.

You may take my comments as hate on these fighters but that isn't the point. The point is the WBC is crooked as hell as screwing with our sport. If not standing for that and pointing it out every chance I get is "biased" so be it.

As for Hopkins picking on the weakest champion, yeah , I don't think that is an accomplishment. WHy not call out the toughest guy in the division or the best ? WHy call out the weakest ? Same MO for a fighter that plaued it safe for the majority of his reign at middleweight.

Gabriel Montoya