1) I am not stressed and if I could not take criticism I wouldn't be a writer ( the process from my PC to the page is a very critique filled one) , I wouldn't identify myself as that writer and I wouldn't put my personal email on all of my articles. If I write passionately , it's because I love to talk fights and debate. Your use of !!! makes it seem like YOU"RE the one that can't take the heat. Weren't you banned by DHB ? Why ? I remember you as a good poster . At least a guy by the same name.

2) Fighting DLH was not a challenge in any way shape or form. The guy started at 135. C'mon.

3) Anyone that didn't think Hopkins could beat Tito doesn't know Boxing. The "experts" love to belive hype and slept on BHOP in my opinion.

4) Hopkins was NOT champion when he fought RJJ. They foguth for the vacant IBF title.

5) Hop was hoping that Taylor was too green to be a threat IMO. He was wrong.

6) The fights that Hop left on the table are waaay better than the fights he actually had. Not denying his accomplishment . 20 defenses is a record that will stand a long time. But look at how long it took to unify. If Tito hadn't been a part of that tournament, he may never have unified. Fighting mandos for the majority of your reign is not risktaking. Fighting Allen 3 times and Hakkar and Carl Daniels is not risk taking.