I don't care what Tyson did after he won the belts from the true champion. He is champ until someone beats him. He's fighting, so his retirement wasn't real. Haye didn't beat a true champion, err, I mean AJ didn't beat a true champion.
Cotto didn't beat the best so he wasn't the best so Clanelo didn't beat the best either.
Falls under the same thing I say every time. All that matters is who you fight. Champions are fighters, not men with arbitrary belts.
They live, We sleep
What are you talking about? I said "I don't care..." His suspension falls under that. Sure, pathetic, but not pretending to sign a crap contract pathetic. My argument is fighting the best proves you are the best.
What does Tyson now have to do with that? Did I say Tyson is the best now? No, I said he is the real champion. Because he beat the best.
I don't even like Fury, I hope he gets KTFO tonight. But at least he has proven willing to fight the best.
Last edited by Ron Swanson; 08-19-2018 at 09:09 AM.
By your theory you have to beat the best to become champ, Fury is not the best.
How did Wlad become the best? Most feel it was with the Povetkin win. That fight was October '13. Vital didn't officially retire until December '13. So did Wlad beat the best?
I don't really car either, just trying to understand your logic.
Hopkins definitely best the best, and the line followed on from there.
I'm not even going to get into the absurdity of not recognising the retirement, or the suspension.
I agree the best should fight the best but there are a few wholes in your logic.
They live, We sleep
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks