Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  1
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez how does he stack up historically?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    580
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez how does he stack up historically?

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Oh and pleeeeease....... Canelo is NOT too small for 160. Hasn't been for years. He fought JCC Jr. at 170 ffs.
    I think Kabong was responding to me, when I said he hasn't done enough at 160 yet for me to accurately assess. Not that he is too small.
    They live, We sleep

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    580
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez how does he stack up historically?

    I must say I think a young Vargas (prior to Tito) gives him hell.

    Quartey at 147 would be sweet.
    They live, We sleep

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,867
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2052
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez how does he stack up historically?

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    I must say I think a young Vargas (prior to Tito) gives him hell.

    Quartey at 147 would be sweet.


    Vargas-Canelo would've been a hell of an entertaining fight. Vargas would be too much for Canelo though, IMO.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    580
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez how does he stack up historically?

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    I must say I think a young Vargas (prior to Tito) gives him hell.

    Quartey at 147 would be sweet.


    Vargas-Canelo would've been a hell of an entertaining fight. Vargas would be too much for Canelo though, IMO.
    50/50 for me.
    They live, We sleep

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Saul Alvarez
    By bradlee180 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11-20-2021, 08:48 PM
  2. Replies: 334
    Last Post: 04-24-2013, 09:03 PM
  3. Replies: 41
    Last Post: 10-31-2012, 04:54 PM
  4. If Saul Alvarez win . . .?
    By Ant Live in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-14-2012, 12:36 AM
  5. Saul El Canelo Alvarez tribute
    By outspoken in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-20-2011, 12:07 AM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing