The key difference is we don’t know for a fact Charlo, who has every right to, has petitioned to avoid GGG. We know GGG petitioned to avoid a Charlo fight. We have no evidence Charlo is looking anywhere else, we know GGG has contacted at least 4 other camps besides Canelo’s and we have no evidence GGG has contacted Charlo’s camp.
True we have no evidence Charlo’s camp has contacted GGGs, the difference is who has openly looked elsewhere and openly petitioned to avoid.
It may very well come out Charlo doesn’t want GGG right now. But we know GGG doesn’t want Charlo right now.
We can look at business, next occasion we can look at venues, next occasion...he was GGGs mandatory for over a year.
I don’t think it’s very fair to blame a guy being avoided for his weak opposition until he gets his chance. Once he can choose then it becomes fair to judge. I mean who’s fault is it that Charlo hasn’t faced GGG for example?
I can certainly understand GGG looking at someone else, but looking at everyone else looks bad.
Bookmarks