Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  5
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 44

Thread: They're talking GGG-Brant now

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,894
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: They're talking GGG-Brant now

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    GGG should either try to fight Charlo , Jacobs or Andrade . If none of these can be made , he should fucking retire.


    Why? Maybe just playing devil's advocate but why? Other than having fought the undersized Brook, and his insistence of fighting Canelo again in VEGAS, I see nothing wrong with his record. Why does GGG have to fight one of three fighters of our choosing right now? It seems a different bar than we hold for other fighters. I wish other 160-pounders were held to the same strict conditions. Fight X, Y, or Z right NOW, or retire! Just seems rather double-standardish. Not trying to yank your chain, but GGG gets a lot of hate that should be reserved for those who REALLY do the blatant ducking.

    Reasons have been given as to why GGG and Charlo haven't met yet. Charlo is a relative newcomer to middleweight, but the bandwagon wants GGG to fight him NOW. What's the huge hurry and why is GGG the chosen one? All I know is I'd like to see the same level of indignity poured on any other 160 who prances around picking and choosing.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,436
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    794
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: They're talking GGG-Brant now

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    GGG should either try to fight Charlo , Jacobs or Andrade . If none of these can be made , he should fucking retire.


    Why? Maybe just playing devil's advocate but why? Other than having fought the undersized Brook, and his insistence of fighting Canelo again in VEGAS, I see nothing wrong with his record. Why does GGG have to fight one of three fighters of our choosing right now? It seems a different bar than we hold for other fighters. I wish other 160-pounders were held to the same strict conditions. Fight X, Y, or Z right NOW, or retire! Just seems rather double-standardish. Not trying to yank your chain, but GGG gets a lot of hate that should be reserved for those who REALLY do the blatant ducking.

    Reasons have been given as to why GGG and Charlo haven't met yet. Charlo is a relative newcomer to middleweight, but the bandwagon wants GGG to fight him NOW. What's the huge hurry and why is GGG the chosen one? All I know is I'd like to see the same level of indignity poured on any other 160 who prances around picking and choosing.
    I never said anything was wrong with his record. but at his age , only meaningful fights should happen. Brant is a champion, so OK that counts , no problem.
    But after years of saying he wanted all the belts at MW before doing anything else , he backtracked completely and fought Canelo (who had fuck all belts) for the dollar signs lighting up in his eyes. that's ok , but when you sell your soul to the devil , don't go bleating about it afterwards when it doesn't go your way.
    I had no problem with either decision personally, but he knew he wouldn't get a fair shake in Vegas and still signed up ......TWICE!
    now they talk about "for the right fight he could go SMW, and that could be Smith." well when Ward wanted him , I was all on GGG's side because it didn't make sense giving up all that size to a class boxer like Ward. But Smith is fucking bigger, a lot bigger, and all of a sudden , they would think about it.
    if that's not cherry picking, I don't know what is.
    GGG may have earned big money in the last couple of years, but in my opinion , at a cost to his legacy. you can't have it all.
    my big problem is that whoever he fights, whoever he beats, it's all with a view to getting Canelo again, and all I see there is another fight that delays the division moving forward. That should not be his priority.
    Former Undisputed 4 belt Prediction champion. Still P4P and People’s Champion.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,436
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    794
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: They're talking GGG-Brant now

    btw, I don't hate GGG, far from it. But I am disappointed with the way his career has gone and the people around him.
    Former Undisputed 4 belt Prediction champion. Still P4P and People’s Champion.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    712
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: They're talking GGG-Brant now

    Not that I’m saying that GGG ducked fighters throughout his reign, but he has more legitimate fights to be made now since the division is getting deeper. That’s why I want him to fight the top tier guys instead of someone like Brant. I get that the fight makes some sense, but if he fights Brant, he will probably never fight Charlo, Andrade, BJS, or Jacobs (rematch) because of age.

  5. #5
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: They're talking GGG-Brant now

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    btw, I don't hate GGG, far from it. But I am disappointed with the way his career has gone and the people around him.
    There's guys for him to fight, he needs to forget making a legacy as a champion right now and focus on legacy as a fighter....PLENTY of people for him to fight, don't know if he'll buzzsaw through them though being older and more battleworn.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Ryota Murata vs Rob Brant
    By KickMuck in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-22-2018, 12:37 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-17-2017, 09:12 AM
  3. Talking Referees
    By greynotsoold in forum Important / Useful Posts
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-07-2008, 01:10 PM
  4. What was DLH talking about?
    By overhandright in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-09-2007, 02:18 AM
  5. Talking cats?
    By Preme in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-19-2007, 02:10 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing