Thanks: 7
Likes: 203
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
There was never any controversial judging for Klitschko's fights. Can you remember any?
However, the US has become by far the #1 country for robberies and shady refereeing in recent years, with the UK solidly in the #2 spot.
Golub vs Clark
Kovalev vs Ward
GGG vs Canelo
Browne vs Kaladjdzic
Herrera vs Danny Garcia
Loma vs Salido (obviously dodgy referee, questionable scorecards)
Hooker vs Perez
And a few years back:
Pacquiao-Bradley I
Holyfield-Lewis I
Tiberi-Toney
Kessler-Ward (ref let Ward use illegal tactics such as headbutts to blind Kessler)
Castillo-Mayweather I
Sturm-De La Hoya
and many, many more.
Array
And American judges DO favor Wilder.
Luis Ortiz clearly won several rounds he wasn't given credit for, as did Artur Szpilka.
Array
Proportionally Germany are worse, Ottke, Sturm and Povetkin come to mind.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Array
Germany and the UK pale in comparison to the WBC Vegas-Mexico-Texas Mafia. But this doesn't apply to Wilder.
Fury has nothing to fear from the LA judges.
Array
People just don't like Germany because of WW 2.
Povetkin's only controversial win was over a German boxer in Germany. Klitschko's illegal tactics against him should have been penalized, but the fight was in Moscow (go figure).
Sturm has won some questionable decisions, but only one was as bad as when he was robbed against De La Hoya.
If you actually watch Ottke's fights, the only one that was really dodgy was against Reid.
Array
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks