Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
As I said, Alpha, you haven't started from an impartial position - "lets examine the evidence," you've already decided any explanation which refutes the conspiracy theory is invalid because the source is corrupt, so what is the point in asking questions in the first place?

Footprints? Answer - Particles of moon dust have a different size and shape from sand and don't need moisture to hold a compressed shape. Many powders on Earth can behave in the same way. Try walking in spilt talcum powder

No Blast Crater? Answer - At first glance, conspiracy theorists have a point here. There should be a blast crater beneath the landing module - that is, if it were making its landing on Earth instead of a lower gravity environment. Landing on the Moon requires far less thrust than is necessary on Earth since there is far less gravitational pull.

Additionally, the landing module set down on solid rock and left no more of a crater than a 747 jet would on the runway at an airport. The lack of a crater actually supports the authenticity of the Moon landing, because if they were perpetuating a hoax, it stands to reason NASA would have also thought of a blast crater and made sure there was one in place to satisfy the critics. The fact of the matter is there was no crater created by the actual landing, and they did not feel compelled to dig one so that their landing would appear more authentic.

From your starting point every possible explanation is dismissed with - corruption. It is the same with virtually all conspiracy theories.
@Fenster is that your writing it’s good
If course its not, is someone else's story, which is just hearsay.

Let us analyse all the original data so we can see what actually went on. You lost it? All of it? Come on. Evidence please.

What about the space rocks that were brought back? Can we analyse those please? What they turning out to be fake?

How about another simple question. Remember Nixon on the landline talking to the actors in space in 1969? That's some connection. Even now with today's technology my reception cuts out all over the place. But they have perfect reception hours many thousands of miles away?

Start believing your own common sense, rather than stories.