NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

[Alpha]

Was there even one Snowden in the (fake moon landing) conspiracy? Anyone try to spill the beans in all these years

Gus Grissom was outspoken about NASA's capabilities, his team dies 2 weeks later.

But your all missing the obvious, like Nixon on the landline, does anyone here believe he was speaking to the actors on a landline? Then ask yourself why they were presenting that story to you.

If you truly believe that the moon landings were real, you have lost the virtue of discernment and I feel sorry for you.

They can make up any excuse they want about the Van Allen belts, but how many times did they confirm the radiation levels or check that the actors were ok while passing through? Never, seems odd. They'll tell you they had to make a northerly heading to avoid the most dangerous parts, but their logs don't show this, they actually contradict it, and show a heading just south of the equator.

Official NASA images when put into photo forensics show a square background behind images, like they have been pasted on. Also anyone with some photography knowledge knows about noise in photos. It basically means as you brighten an image the dark shadowed areas will also lighten up due to this noise. The NASA photo's don't display any of this noise in the shadowed parts. They remain completely black. This is basic stuff you can do yourself.

The truth never changes, but you have to keep adding to a lie.

[walrus]

Was there even one Snowden in the (fake moon landing) conspiracy? Anyone try to spill the beans in all these years

Gus Grissom was outspoken about NASA's capabilities, his team dies 2 weeks later.

But your all missing the obvious, like Nixon on the landline, does anyone here believe he was speaking to the actors on a landline? Then ask yourself why they were presenting that story to you.

If you truly believe that the moon landings were real, you have lost the virtue of discernment and I feel sorry for you.

They can make up any excuse they want about the Van Allen belts, but how many times did they confirm the radiation levels or check that the actors were ok while passing through? Never, seems odd. They'll tell you they had to make a northerly heading to avoid the most dangerous parts, but their logs don't show this, they actually contradict it, and show a heading just south of the equator.

Official NASA images when put into photo forensics show a square background behind images, like they have been pasted on. Also anyone with some photography knowledge knows about noise in photos. It basically means as you brighten an image the dark shadowed areas will also lighten up due to this noise. The NASA photo's don't display any of this noise in the shadowed parts. They remain completely black. This is basic stuff you can do yourself.

The truth never changes, but you have to keep adding to a lie.

ill ask again cause I never looked, was there even one ed Snowden spilling the beanz.

[walrus]

And alpha, u keep bringing up the landline. What are u saying, you think it was a direct line from the pole to outer space? You don’t think any other tech was involved? I don’t get your hang up with the land line

[Alpha]

And alpha, u keep bringing up the landline. What are u saying, you think it was a direct line from the pole to outer space? You don’t think any other tech was involved? I don’t get your hang up with the land line

My hang up is: Do you believe the president was on a landline talking to the actors hundreds of thousands of miles away?

[walrus]

And alpha, u keep bringing up the landline. What are u saying, you think it was a direct line from the pole to outer space? You don’t think any other tech was involved? I don’t get your hang up with the land line

My hang up is: Do you believe the president was on a landline talking to the actors hundreds of thousands of miles away?

Do u think it was only being transmitted via landline

[Alpha]

And alpha, u keep bringing up the landline. What are u saying, you think it was a direct line from the pole to outer space? You don’t think any other tech was involved? I don’t get your hang up with the land line

My hang up is: Do you believe the president was on a landline talking to the actors hundreds of thousands of miles away?

Do u think it was only being transmitted via landline

Are you just going to keep asking me questions, but not answer any yourself. I always answer a question when asked, check my posts, anyone asks me something, if I see it obviously, I will answer. No problem.

I could speculate that it could have been transmitted by satellite link or something like that. I don't believe that. But your missing the point.

[p4pking]

Walrus actually makes a good point that applies to most conspiracy theories, especially something like 911. There is never anyone credible who was “allegedly” part of it that comes out even hinting at a hoax. Now think about how many people would have had to be directly involved, much less privy to it happening, in order to make something like that work. You don’t think there would be so much as a deathbed confession? They would all go to the grave too afraid of “them”? No offence but you’re posting like a stoned teenager. You haven’t answered questions or cited any of your own evidence to the contrary, and it’s you’re*, ffs.....

[Alpha]

Was there even one Snowden in the (fake moon landing) conspiracy? Anyone try to spill the beans in all these years

Gus Grissom was outspoken about NASA's capabilities, his team dies 2 weeks later.

But your all missing the obvious, like Nixon on the landline, does anyone here believe he was speaking to the actors on a landline? Then ask yourself why they were presenting that story to you.

If you truly believe that the moon landings were real, you have lost the virtue of discernment and I feel sorry for you.

They can make up any excuse they want about the Van Allen belts, but how many times did they confirm the radiation levels or check that the actors were ok while passing through? Never, seems odd. They'll tell you they had to make a northerly heading to avoid the most dangerous parts, but their logs don't show this, they actually contradict it, and show a heading just south of the equator.

Official NASA images when put into photo forensics show a square background behind images, like they have been pasted on. Also anyone with some photography knowledge knows about noise in photos. It basically means as you brighten an image the dark shadowed areas will also lighten up due to this noise. The NASA photo's don't display any of this noise in the shadowed parts. They remain completely black. This is basic stuff you can do yourself.

The truth never changes, but you have to keep adding to a lie.

ill ask again cause I never looked, was there even one ed Snowden spilling the beanz.

I can't tell ya, I do know there have been mystery NASA deaths. NASA and the moon landings aren't really my thing, but I am able to use common sense and it really is comical how fake this is.