Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  2
Likes Likes:  60
Dislikes Dislikes:  1
Results 1 to 15 of 310

Thread: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    557
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    And alpha, u keep bringing up the landline. What are u saying, you think it was a direct line from the pole to outer space? You don’t think any other tech was involved? I don’t get your hang up with the land line
    My hang up is: Do you believe the president was on a landline talking to the actors hundreds of thousands of miles away?
    They live, We sleep

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    915
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    And alpha, u keep bringing up the landline. What are u saying, you think it was a direct line from the pole to outer space? You don’t think any other tech was involved? I don’t get your hang up with the land line
    My hang up is: Do you believe the president was on a landline talking to the actors hundreds of thousands of miles away?
    Do u think it was only being transmitted via landline

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    557
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    And alpha, u keep bringing up the landline. What are u saying, you think it was a direct line from the pole to outer space? You don’t think any other tech was involved? I don’t get your hang up with the land line
    My hang up is: Do you believe the president was on a landline talking to the actors hundreds of thousands of miles away?
    Do u think it was only being transmitted via landline
    Are you just going to keep asking me questions, but not answer any yourself. I always answer a question when asked, check my posts, anyone asks me something, if I see it obviously, I will answer. No problem.

    I could speculate that it could have been transmitted by satellite link or something like that. I don't believe that. But your missing the point.
    They live, We sleep

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1335
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Walrus actually makes a good point that applies to most conspiracy theories, especially something like 911. There is never anyone credible who was “allegedly” part of it that comes out even hinting at a hoax. Now think about how many people would have had to be directly involved, much less privy to it happening, in order to make something like that work. You don’t think there would be so much as a deathbed confession? They would all go to the grave too afraid of “them”? No offence but you’re posting like a stoned teenager. You haven’t answered questions or cited any of your own evidence to the contrary, and it’s you’re*, ffs.....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    557
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Walrus actually makes a good point that applies to most conspiracy theories, especially something like 911. There is never anyone credible who was “allegedly” part of it that comes out even hinting at a hoax. Now think about how many people would have had to be directly involved, much less privy to it happening, in order to make something like that work. You don’t think there would be so much as a deathbed confession? They would all go to the grave too afraid of “them”? No offence but you’re posting like a stoned teenager. You haven’t answered questions or cited any of your own evidence to the contrary, and it’s you’re*, ffs.....
    Come on mate, don't worry about the spelling. That's weak.

    Just saying there are no confessions, is not proof that the moon landings are real. In no way does it prove the authenticity.

    What questions haven't I answered?

    I like to use stuff I am familiar with, no base my ideas on photo shopped images or fake films.

    I am familiar with phones, we all are. We are all familiar with cell phones right?

    Now in 2018 just walking into another room on my phone, my reception can drop out. We all have experience with this. We all know it wouldn't be possible to have a cable from earth to the moon, so the president could talk on a landline to the guys on the moon.

    But that's the story they sold you. I didn't make that video. They did. So I ask myself, why would they be selling me this story that I know can't be real. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. Then you look into everything else and it is comically how brain washed we are. Believing film, images and stories, rather than your own common sense, when it's obvious to see that they are lying to you.

    And I can provide you any evidence you want, they supplied the images that you can examine for yourself and see they have been altered or have no noise.

    You can look up the official logs and compare them. The story about traveling through the Van Allan belts as safely as possible, completely contradict their official logs.
    They live, We sleep

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1335
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    It’s not spelling, you’re using the wrong word and it makes you sound like a kid. Saying there were no confessions would be using the common sense you like to bang on about, it would be very very hard to believe nobody either involved or with credentials in anything related to space travel or astrophysics ever came out to support your claims. The vast majority of early unmanned attempts to land on the moon over nearly two decades failed. Were they all a hoax too? There have been numerous 3rd party investigations by neutral countries with their own space programs in later years which have photographed the site of and confirmed the moon landing, fact. If you listen to Nixon’s conversation unedited, there was well over a 2 second pause in most of the exchanges, as it was made via a radio call that had to be relayed from numerous satellites and then from Houston. Sometimes the “story” we are told is just what happened, otherwise people a hell of a lot smarter than we are could have come up with something of substance to refute it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    557
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    It’s not spelling, you’re using the wrong word and it makes you sound like a kid. Saying there were no confessions would be using the common sense you like to bang on about, it would be very very hard to believe nobody either involved or with credentials in anything related to space travel or astrophysics ever came out to support your claims. The vast majority of early unmanned attempts to land on the moon over nearly two decades failed. Were they all a hoax too? There have been numerous 3rd party investigations by neutral countries with their own space programs in later years which have photographed the site of and confirmed the moon landing, fact. If you listen to Nixon’s conversation unedited, there was well over a 2 second pause in most of the exchanges, as it was made via a radio call that had to be relayed from numerous satellites and then from Houston. Sometimes the “story” we are told is just what happened, otherwise people a hell of a lot smarter than we are could have come up with something of substance to refute it.
    We're in a boxing forum bud, take a break. Sometimes auto correct changes sh-t, and I don't really care to go back and proof read.

    The evidence is there. How easy is it to blackmail people? Threaten you or your loved ones lives? Destroy you're credibility? NASA was getting millions a day. People are easy to control. This is shown everyday in TV and films, it's not beyond the realm of impossibility.

    Again you're taking the word of all these agencies and their images and films. They all have an agenda.

    The evidence is there for everyone to see if they look into it. No ones hiding it.
    They live, We sleep

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. NASA Mission to search for life on Europa
    By Freedom in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-18-2017, 12:59 AM
  2. The Truth - Why Nasa Has Never Returned To The Moon
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-07-2013, 08:32 AM
  3. Live Nasa feed
    By Youngblood in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-29-2009, 10:42 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing