Bloody Marx has a lot to answer for. It always ends up being about those bloody Marxists and their agenda. To be fair to poor old Darwin, fascists tended to pick up on his ideas in rather crude ways too. Darwin was agnostic, but in the same way that Einstein or even Dawkins is. No scientist can say "Hand on heart I am 100% an atheist" as that would make you as much an absolutist as the double digit IQ types who argue that man walked with dinosaurs (check the polls, many do indeed believe just that).

In terms of probability those scientists did not believe in a God in any way comparable to the angry bloke or now gender neutral thing that would blow up cities or make odd demands on individual humans every now and then. They just accept that we do not have all the answers, but God is hardly the most practical solution. After all, who invented that very angry man.....sorry erm thing. Then who invented that? And then that? And then that? And on it goes forevermore.

We have this fine planet here and we do at least have some understanding of what it is and how it got here and why life is as it is. At the end of the day if God is unwilling to prove himself.....sorry herself......sorry itself....then that is on it. It is neither here nor there and neither does it matter. It is insanity that we label criticism of something that most likely doesn't even exist as hate crime nowadays too. Humanity has issues going down this path. The only reality we have at the moment is that there is almost no evidence for the existence of a God. Call its name at the top of your voice and nothing will happen. You will never see or hear anything unless your brain is broken or you have had too much brandy that evening or slyly slipped a tab of LSD. It does not matter too much at the end of the day.

And yes God is now gender neutral according to some bloke who is clearly not making it up as he goes along based on no evidence at all.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/sh...-of-canterbury