Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  2
Likes Likes:  60
Dislikes Dislikes:  1
Results 1 to 15 of 310

Thread: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    558
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Flat, round, elliptical, pear-shaped...... you just have to ask yourself what geometrical shape is more logical to be hurtling through space without undue stresses, and where everything is pretty symmetrical. I don't think we have to delve into quantum physics to surmise that something close to a sphere is the natural shape that is more conducive to traveling through space as a celestial body.
    Logical to be hurtling through space?

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    What are the odds that we're one of the only flat planets though. Or the only one, and exactly how many known spherical planets can be seen with the naked eye across the World or with high powered telescopes, observatories etc. If one is a flat Earther do we dispute that these are 'known' Planets to begin with?
    The planets were originally called wondering stars. Take a look at the planets through high powered telescopes (there a heaps on YT), they look like light, not like the CGI images NASA presents.

    Think about a pool table, just because the balls are round, doesn't mean the table is round as well, is a good example of your assumption.
    They live, We sleep

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,398
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    807
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    558
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    So are these the ones from Greenland or Devon Island? Fake, fake, fake, fake.

    No one ever got back to me about all the dirt on the lens cap but the very next photo they released, there was no dirt to be seen.

    We should start a GoFundMe for NASA to get a bunch of GoPro's to attach everywhere 'next time', obviously 50 million a day only goes so far.
    They live, We sleep

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,075
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5123
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Flat, round, elliptical, pear-shaped...... you just have to ask yourself what geometrical shape is more logical to be hurtling through space without undue stresses, and where everything is pretty symmetrical. I don't think we have to delve into quantum physics to surmise that something close to a sphere is the natural shape that is more conducive to traveling through space as a celestial body.
    Logical to be hurtling through space?

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    What are the odds that we're one of the only flat planets though. Or the only one, and exactly how many known spherical planets can be seen with the naked eye across the World or with high powered telescopes, observatories etc. If one is a flat Earther do we dispute that these are 'known' Planets to begin with?
    The planets were originally called wondering stars. Take a look at the planets through high powered telescopes (there a heaps on YT), they look like light, not like the CGI images NASA presents.

    Think about a pool table, just because the balls are round, doesn't mean the table is round as well, is a good example of your assumption.
    Pool table.. huh . So you're saying there's a great chance Earth would be the only flat planet, or what we see through telescopes is indistinguishable as flat or round? Save for the Moon clear to the naked eye as round. I thought there were other planets clear to the eye as round also? Depending on location.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    558
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Flat, round, elliptical, pear-shaped...... you just have to ask yourself what geometrical shape is more logical to be hurtling through space without undue stresses, and where everything is pretty symmetrical. I don't think we have to delve into quantum physics to surmise that something close to a sphere is the natural shape that is more conducive to traveling through space as a celestial body.
    Logical to be hurtling through space?

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
    What are the odds that we're one of the only flat planets though. Or the only one, and exactly how many known spherical planets can be seen with the naked eye across the World or with high powered telescopes, observatories etc. If one is a flat Earther do we dispute that these are 'known' Planets to begin with?
    The planets were originally called wondering stars. Take a look at the planets through high powered telescopes (there a heaps on YT), they look like light, not like the CGI images NASA presents.

    Think about a pool table, just because the balls are round, doesn't mean the table is round as well, is a good example of your assumption.
    Pool table.. huh . So you're saying there's a great chance Earth would be the only flat planet, or what we see through telescopes is indistinguishable as flat or round? Save for the Moon clear to the naked eye as round. I thought there were other planets clear to the eye as round also? Depending on location.
    I'm just saying by you're reasoning the pool table example can be used. Just because the balls are round, doesn't mean the table is as well.

    Sure planets look round, but solid? Take a look yourself if you get the chance. They look nothing like NASA's 'super' telescope images. Like I mentioned, the ancients referred to them as 'wandering stars'.

    We only ever see 1 side of the moon from earth. Take away NASA's fake images and you can see the possibility of it being a disc.
    They live, We sleep

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,398
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    807
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    The planets were originally called wondering stars. Take a look at the planets through high powered telescopes (there a heaps on YT), they look like light, not like the CGI images NASA presents.

    Think about a pool table, just because the balls are round, doesn't mean the table is round as well, is a good example of your assumption.
    Thanks for the humorous posts, Alpha.

    I for one can tell you're not serious, you're just playing with us.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    558
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by Freedom View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    The planets were originally called wondering stars. Take a look at the planets through high powered telescopes (there a heaps on YT), they look like light, not like the CGI images NASA presents.

    Think about a pool table, just because the balls are round, doesn't mean the table is round as well, is a good example of your assumption.
    Thanks for the humorous posts, Alpha.

    I for one can tell you're not serious, you're just playing with us.
    I'm serious Freedom, and I mean know offense when I say this to you but you have already mentioned that you happily believe the bible, with no empirical evidence, so it's no surprise you believe this as well. Even when the evidence is shown clearly to you, you will continue to deny it.

    There's a quote by someone saying something like 'it's harder to convince someone that they have been deceived, than it is to deceive them'.

    You will freely agree that governments lie to us about everything, but are 100% sure they are telling you the truth about this. The propaganda they use to fool us is powerful.

    I prefer to follow natural science rather than the formal science, that do not involve empirical procedures.
    They live, We sleep

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    558
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    And I just want to point out 1 thing, look at how quick they got Steph Curry to change his tune, to now being all jokes.
    They live, We sleep

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1336
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    That probably just means the corporation he plays for doesn’t want a guy who generates so much revenue for throwing a ball around to alienate some of their fan base and lose revenue by making himself look like a lunatic. When anonymous trolls do so it just provides a laugh. I’m sure there are plenty of people who might otherwise wear his jersey or shoes think “yea maybe not”.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    558
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    That probably just means the corporation he plays for doesn’t want a guy who generates so much revenue for throwing a ball around to alienate some of their fan base and lose revenue by making himself look like a lunatic. When anonymous trolls do so it just provides a laugh. I’m sure there are plenty of people who might otherwise wear his jersey or shoes think “yea maybe not”.
    So you agree he was controlled?

    Yea why have his own opinion? Follow what everyone else says, sheep.
    They live, We sleep

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1336
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    That probably just means the corporation he plays for doesn’t want a guy who generates so much revenue for throwing a ball around to alienate some of their fan base and lose revenue by making himself look like a lunatic. When anonymous trolls do so it just provides a laugh. I’m sure there are plenty of people who might otherwise wear his jersey or shoes think “yea maybe not”.
    So you agree he was controlled?

    Yea why have his own opinion? Follow what everyone else says, sheep.
    I don’t watch basketball, but any athlete who plays for a franchise is controlled, of course. They work for that company and depend on viewers and merchandise sales to make everyone and themselves money. There is a line between having an opinion and saying ridiculous things, and people with a public image to maintain have to be much more careful of course. He might say “I feel women shouldn’t have rights and gay people should be killed”, but it would be career over, unless he was a Muslim I suppose.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,398
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    807
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    I'm serious Freedom, and I mean know offense when I say this to you but you have already mentioned that you happily believe the bible, with no empirical evidence, so it's no surprise you believe this as well.
    I believe in Jesus and His teachings. There is nothing in science that can prove He was wrong.

    But I don't believe in the Old Testament, especially not Genesis and the story of Jonah.

    I do believe in evolution, but at the same time I believe in God, and yes that requires faith. Although I'm not sure of the true nature of God, I think the best explanation is panentheism.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    7,891
    Mentioned
    184 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    558
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by Freedom View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    I'm serious Freedom, and I mean know offense when I say this to you but you have already mentioned that you happily believe the bible, with no empirical evidence, so it's no surprise you believe this as well.
    I believe in Jesus and His teachings. There is nothing in science that can prove He was wrong.

    But I don't believe in the Old Testament, especially not Genesis and the story of Jonah.

    I do believe in evolution, but at the same time I believe in God, and yes that requires faith. Although I'm not sure of the true nature of God, I think the best explanation is panentheism.
    I'm not sure what you mean by "nothing in science can prove he was wrong"

    There are numerous contradictions in the bible, would that constitute as proof?

    End of the day you say you "believe", so you don't claim it to be real? Or do you know it's real?

    You don't have to answer if you feel uncomfortable discussing it.
    They live, We sleep

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    9,398
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    807
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    There are numerous contradictions in the bible, would that constitute as proof?
    There no serious contradictions in the four Gospels, although they were written by four different people in three different languages (Matthew and John wrote in Hebrew, Mark in Latin and Luke in Greek) so there's bound to be some minor differences. Matthew and John were disciples, while Mark and Luke were not.

    Different authors give different emphasis to the three core beliefs in Christianity - faith, works and love. For example John consistently emphasized love while Paul more often emphasized faith. Yet in I Corinthians 13 Paul acknowledges that love is greater than faith.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,308
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3107
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

    Richard Branson and Virgin flew into space and the world did not look flat from the pictures they showed.

    Amazon and others want to do the same.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. NASA Mission to search for life on Europa
    By Freedom in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-18-2017, 12:59 AM
  2. The Truth - Why Nasa Has Never Returned To The Moon
    By brocktonblockbust in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-07-2013, 08:32 AM
  3. Live Nasa feed
    By Youngblood in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-29-2009, 10:42 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing