Whyte v Del Boy or Frampton v Warrington - what will you be watching?

[smashup]

Whyte v Chisora will be the one the casual fans watch, people love a big domestic tear up especially in the Heavyweight division.
People know what to expect after the first fight so are guaranteed a war.
Sky are all over social media promoting this while BT in comparison are not.
I reckon it'll be 70/30 tuning into Sky Sports.

[Memphis]

Frampton Warrington is the class of the bunch obviously but people do like a decent punch up. Stick a gun to me head and I'd go with the punch up every time.

I'll be like Kel

[Fenster]

There's some tough fights to call on both cards, I was looking at backing old N'dam to beat old Murray but the bookies were thinking like me (50/50-ish).

Rosales is surely a great price to beat Edwards... if you don't mind steaming into odds on shots (4/7).

Frampton will totally outclass and stop Warrington (3/1 stoppage).

Be disappointing if Whyte can't improve on his last performance against old Del Boy (7/4 stoppage).

I won't be buying either, I'll be snoring when all this happens, but if forced to buy one card I'd probably go for the BT one as there's more fights.

[Fenster]

I've seen the BT promotion all over social media it's just drowned out by the other card. It's just a fact the smaller guys like Frampton and Warrington have always been good ticket sellers but never do good TV numbers.

Hearn has Warren sussed at every turn. From the minute the clash was announced he's acted like the BT card doesn't even exist (not a threat to his show) yet every interview i've seen with Frank/Frampton/Warrington, they've not stopped crying and moaning and slagging off Whyte and Chisora and Eddie. Which has achieved what? They made a rival show look bigger through whinging about it.

Greedy cunts chanced their arm with a tough PPV sell then act like victims because they won't make what they hoped.

[Primo Carnera]

I've seen the BT promotion all over social media it's just drowned out by the other card. It's just a fact the smaller guys like Frampton and Warrington have always been good ticket sellers but never do good TV numbers.

Hearn has Warren sussed at every turn. From the minute the clash was announced he's acted like the BT card doesn't even exist (not a threat to his show) yet every interview i've seen with Frank/Frampton/Warrington, they've not stopped crying and moaning and slagging off Whyte and Chisora and Eddie. Which has achieved what? They made a rival show look bigger through whinging about it.

Greedy cunts chanced their arm with a tough PPV sell then act like victims because they won't make what they hoped.

All the above is fair enough , and I'm not feeling sorry for anyone. But it was still a Cunt's trick to put a PPV on the same night as one already arranged.
He can try to justify it by saying "it's not the first time it's happened" and "He had no choice because of TV dates, Venues, yadda, yadda. But it's still a Cunt's trick.

[smashup]

CARDS COMPARED
Warrington v Frampton

Josh Warrington v Carl Frampton

Mark Heffron v Liam Williams

Nathan Gorman v Razvan Cojanu

Lyndon Arthur v Emmanuel Feuzeu

Jack Massey v Jiri Svacina

Tommy Fury v Jevgenijs Andrejevs

Martin Murray v Hassan N’Dam N’Jikam

Michael Conlan v Jason Cunningham

Billy Joe Saunders v Zoltan Sera

Paddy Barnes v TBA

Danny Wright v TBA

Sam Maxwell v TBA

Whyte v Chisora 2

Dillian Whyte v Dereck Chisora

Ryan Walsh v Reece Bellotti

Cristofer Rosales v Charlie Edwards

Joshua Buatsi v Renold Quinlan

David Price v Tom Little

Linus Udofia v Pavol Garaj

Fabio Wardley v Phil Williams

[Spicoli]

Definitely Whyte v Chisora now that Showtime picked it up. Whyte v Ortiz would be a good scrap.