Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  1
Likes Likes:  12
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 34

Thread: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    19,539
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1899
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Quote Originally Posted by imp View Post
    Let’s get this right..Khan doesn’t need Brook.

    Brook is more famous for his two losses than the fights he won.

    Solid fighter, but his constant calling out of Khan is cringeworthy.

    Khans legacy is already cemented and he can do what he wants..no matter what we all think of him..he creates excitement and people always seem to pay to watch.



    This is spot on

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1331
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    What is khans legacy though? He's defined by his losses too... It's not as if he's bound for the HOF, or that beating brook wouldn't be the highlight of his career. Could be wrong, but he probably sells a lot of tickets for the fact that he's Muslim/from Pakistan? I give him credit for taking challenges, but if that's what he intends to do from here on, why not brook? Its as good a time as any, brook looks like he could be slipping and making the weight could be hard on him. Who makes more sense from a risk reward standpoint?

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3120
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Khan was famous before he turned pro, he was Britain's only representative at the Olympics where he got a silver medal. And yes a 17-year-old British/Asian kid was an obvious ticket to stardom. His amateur rematch with Kinedelan (the gold medalist) was primetime live saturday night in front of millions on terrestrial tv. He was PPV when still British title level.

    Khan doesn't have a great legacy but certainly a solid world-level one. He has plenty of proven world-class wins (Maidana, Zab, Kotelnik, Paulie, Peterson, Collazo and a bunch of exciting fights). He might get in the HOF, as he's a crossover muslim star - headlining several Vegas shows - who has done shitloads for charity in Pakistan/middle east and the UK/US.

    But ultimately his career went from hero to zero.

    Without doubt he'll be remembered for being ironed out, getting up to all kinds of embarrassing shit outside the ring and ducking Brook.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    His fights were NOT PPV level though. They were journeyman career set ups fleecing fans due to hype. This is why many did not like him. It was like how a boyband is presented. It is absurd how British fans are fleeced. I even think the price of Whyte/Chisora is a con job. How much must it cost to be a fight fan? If the fans have to pay PPV they should vote who fights who.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,980
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1031
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    What is khans legacy though? He's defined by his losses too... It's not as if he's bound for the HOF, or that beating brook wouldn't be the highlight of his career. Could be wrong, but he probably sells a lot of tickets for the fact that he's Muslim/from Pakistan? I give him credit for taking challenges, but if that's what he intends to do from here on, why not brook? Its as good a time as any, brook looks like he could be slipping and making the weight could be hard on him. Who makes more sense from a risk reward standpoint?
    I would still rather watch Khan vs Crawford.

    Khan is exciting and has the worldwide appeal.

    Did Brook even beat Porter?

    After Porter, why was he not calling out all the other top guys at 147?!..it was the perfect time.

    Brook is known for the two courageous losses that nearly lost him an eye.

    Khan can do anything he wants..Brook needs this fight as he isn’t very confident about attacking the top guys at 154.

    I do want to see the fight.. but I totally understand the business side of things and the fact that Khan loves being arrogant in this situation as he knows he could easily loose.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    19,539
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1899
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    After Brooks dubious win over Porter he went on a run of fighting piss poor fighters... Jo Jo Dan is one pathetic example.
    He was happy to tread water and keep his belt by taking easy fights.
    Just compare Khan and Brooks best wins, Khan wipes the floor with him for name scalps.
    Its not even close.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1331
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Khan has more name wins for sure, do think Brooks win over porter(yes he clearly won) is as good as any between them though. I definitely agree brook had a weird career path, as has been said. You could’ve argued he wasn’t confident of fighting top opposition, but then he moves up for ggg in his prime and takes on Spence... it didn’t make a lot of sense. His performance against Spence was also extremely good though, better than khan has ever looked arguably.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    644
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Why are you lot talking about boxing?

    This thread should only be used for discussing if Brook is a massive bumder or not.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3120
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
    His fights were NOT PPV level though. They were journeyman career set ups fleecing fans due to hype. This is why many did not like him. It was like how a boyband is presented. It is absurd how British fans are fleeced. I even think the price of Whyte/Chisora is a con job. How much must it cost to be a fight fan? If the fans have to pay PPV they should vote who fights who.
    There's no such thing as "PPV level" and nobody whose ever enjoyed a night of boxing has been fleeced. Journeymen produce classics and all-time greats snoozers. It's always been the way, it's unpredictable, that's the beauty. And you have a choice.

    Lets be honest, virtually everyone who moans about PPV and boxing on TV isn't really a fan, they just like to watch the odd fight now and then. Anyone not interested in Chisora-Whyte because it's PPV wouldn't have been interested regardless.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,250
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3101
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Just because it has always been the way does not make it right.

    There should be standard for PPV level which should be world class fighters fighting one another or unification of major belts. Greedy promoters and their personal rivalries have resulted in poor PPV’s fights which have gradually got worse and now they are putting them on at the same time. There is no real choice for boxing fans who want to watch the fight live on the screen - pay or stream it.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3120
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Just because it has always been the way does not make it right.

    There should be standard for PPV level which should be world class fighters fighting one another or unification of major belts. Greedy promoters and their personal rivalries have resulted in poor PPV’s fights which have gradually got worse and now they are putting them on at the same time. There is no real choice for boxing fans who want to watch the fight live on the screen - pay or stream it.

    No real choice for boxing fans? Is that a joke? You watch illegal streams every single week regardless of whether or not it's the most famous fighters in the world - Canelo, AJ, Fury, Wilder, GGG - or these "greedy shows" you consider a con.

    You moaners don't buy anything, never have and never will, don't even pretend two PPV's at the same time effect you, or the "standard" matters. You'll be here Saturday night posting to yourself and Batman regardless
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,250
    Mentioned
    1697 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3101
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Just because it has always been the way does not make it right.

    There should be standard for PPV level which should be world class fighters fighting one another or unification of major belts. Greedy promoters and their personal rivalries have resulted in poor PPV’s fights which have gradually got worse and now they are putting them on at the same time. There is no real choice for boxing fans who want to watch the fight live on the screen - pay or stream it.

    No real choice for boxing fans? Is that a joke? You watch illegal streams every single week regardless of whether or not it's the most famous fighters in the world - Canelo, AJ, Fury, Wilder, GGG - or these "greedy shows" you consider a con.

    You moaners don't buy anything, never have and never will, don't even pretend two PPV's at the same time effect you, or the "standard" matters. You'll be here Saturday night posting to yourself and Batman regardless
    I have paid in the past for ppv shows but the standard is progressively getting worse. As a boxing fan the only way to watch them all now is through streams as it would cost a fortune to watch them all.

    Of course watching 2 fights at the same time is going to be a big inconvenience as I will be jumping from the computer to the TV to watch both.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    644
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Just because it has always been the way does not make it right.

    There should be standard for PPV level which should be world class fighters fighting one another or unification of major belts. Greedy promoters and their personal rivalries have resulted in poor PPV’s fights which have gradually got worse and now they are putting them on at the same time. There is no real choice for boxing fans who want to watch the fight live on the screen - pay or stream it.

    No real choice for boxing fans? Is that a joke? You watch illegal streams every single week regardless of whether or not it's the most famous fighters in the world - Canelo, AJ, Fury, Wilder, GGG - or these "greedy shows" you consider a con.

    You moaners don't buy anything, never have and never will, don't even pretend two PPV's at the same time effect you, or the "standard" matters. You'll be here Saturday night posting to yourself and Batman regardless
    Not too sure on that one Fenners, my flat flooded the other day so I'm having to stay at me mom n dads at the minute, it'll be tough and go as to whether I'm back home to watch either fight

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,352
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    757
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    with me and PPV's , it's a principle thing. I'm not destitute , I could pay for some. I don't like this live streaming and Kodi bollocks , because it always either freezes or is a shit picture. I would rather wait and watch it properly.
    i have paid for plenty of PPV's in the past, but I WILL NOT pay for PPV's that I don't think deserve it. I know I'm not going to change the World, but why should I line the pockets to excess of the likes of Bellew, Khan , Eubank Jr. , Chisora , Whyte etc. just because they're panto villains.
    Former Undisputed 4 belt Prediction champion. Still P4P and People’s Champion.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    644
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    with me and PPV's , it's a principle thing. I'm not destitute , I could pay for some. I don't like this live streaming and Kodi bollocks , because it always either freezes or is a shit picture. I would rather wait and watch it properly.
    i have paid for plenty of PPV's in the past, but I WILL NOT pay for PPV's that I don't think deserve it. I know I'm not going to change the World, but why should I line the pockets to excess of the likes of Bellew, Khan , Eubank Jr. , Chisora , Whyte etc. just because they're panto villains.
    IPTV works a treat for me mate, never had it freeze up on me or if it has it is very rare for it to do so.

    I spent hundreds on PPV but being in a low paid job and living alone it was simply too expensive for me to keep it up.

    I pay £8 a month and get everything now

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Floyd: "amir khan fight makes sense"
    By imp in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-17-2013, 01:15 PM
  2. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-15-2012, 08:54 PM
  3. Hector "Macho" Camacho vs. Amir Khan
    By Hulk in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-05-2011, 03:12 AM
  4. Replies: 48
    Last Post: 01-27-2010, 08:00 PM
  5. Replies: 65
    Last Post: 09-19-2008, 05:02 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing