Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  1
Likes Likes:  12
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,881
    Mentioned
    1703 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3137
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Just because it has always been the way does not make it right.

    There should be standard for PPV level which should be world class fighters fighting one another or unification of major belts. Greedy promoters and their personal rivalries have resulted in poor PPV’s fights which have gradually got worse and now they are putting them on at the same time. There is no real choice for boxing fans who want to watch the fight live on the screen - pay or stream it.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3150
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Just because it has always been the way does not make it right.

    There should be standard for PPV level which should be world class fighters fighting one another or unification of major belts. Greedy promoters and their personal rivalries have resulted in poor PPV’s fights which have gradually got worse and now they are putting them on at the same time. There is no real choice for boxing fans who want to watch the fight live on the screen - pay or stream it.

    No real choice for boxing fans? Is that a joke? You watch illegal streams every single week regardless of whether or not it's the most famous fighters in the world - Canelo, AJ, Fury, Wilder, GGG - or these "greedy shows" you consider a con.

    You moaners don't buy anything, never have and never will, don't even pretend two PPV's at the same time effect you, or the "standard" matters. You'll be here Saturday night posting to yourself and Batman regardless
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,881
    Mentioned
    1703 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3137
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Just because it has always been the way does not make it right.

    There should be standard for PPV level which should be world class fighters fighting one another or unification of major belts. Greedy promoters and their personal rivalries have resulted in poor PPV’s fights which have gradually got worse and now they are putting them on at the same time. There is no real choice for boxing fans who want to watch the fight live on the screen - pay or stream it.

    No real choice for boxing fans? Is that a joke? You watch illegal streams every single week regardless of whether or not it's the most famous fighters in the world - Canelo, AJ, Fury, Wilder, GGG - or these "greedy shows" you consider a con.

    You moaners don't buy anything, never have and never will, don't even pretend two PPV's at the same time effect you, or the "standard" matters. You'll be here Saturday night posting to yourself and Batman regardless
    I have paid in the past for ppv shows but the standard is progressively getting worse. As a boxing fan the only way to watch them all now is through streams as it would cost a fortune to watch them all.

    Of course watching 2 fights at the same time is going to be a big inconvenience as I will be jumping from the computer to the TV to watch both.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,433
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    789
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    with me and PPV's , it's a principle thing. I'm not destitute , I could pay for some. I don't like this live streaming and Kodi bollocks , because it always either freezes or is a shit picture. I would rather wait and watch it properly.
    i have paid for plenty of PPV's in the past, but I WILL NOT pay for PPV's that I don't think deserve it. I know I'm not going to change the World, but why should I line the pockets to excess of the likes of Bellew, Khan , Eubank Jr. , Chisora , Whyte etc. just because they're panto villains.
    Former Undisputed 4 belt Prediction champion. Still P4P and People’s Champion.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    674
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    with me and PPV's , it's a principle thing. I'm not destitute , I could pay for some. I don't like this live streaming and Kodi bollocks , because it always either freezes or is a shit picture. I would rather wait and watch it properly.
    i have paid for plenty of PPV's in the past, but I WILL NOT pay for PPV's that I don't think deserve it. I know I'm not going to change the World, but why should I line the pockets to excess of the likes of Bellew, Khan , Eubank Jr. , Chisora , Whyte etc. just because they're panto villains.
    IPTV works a treat for me mate, never had it freeze up on me or if it has it is very rare for it to do so.

    I spent hundreds on PPV but being in a low paid job and living alone it was simply too expensive for me to keep it up.

    I pay £8 a month and get everything now

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    674
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Just because it has always been the way does not make it right.

    There should be standard for PPV level which should be world class fighters fighting one another or unification of major belts. Greedy promoters and their personal rivalries have resulted in poor PPV’s fights which have gradually got worse and now they are putting them on at the same time. There is no real choice for boxing fans who want to watch the fight live on the screen - pay or stream it.

    No real choice for boxing fans? Is that a joke? You watch illegal streams every single week regardless of whether or not it's the most famous fighters in the world - Canelo, AJ, Fury, Wilder, GGG - or these "greedy shows" you consider a con.

    You moaners don't buy anything, never have and never will, don't even pretend two PPV's at the same time effect you, or the "standard" matters. You'll be here Saturday night posting to yourself and Batman regardless
    Not too sure on that one Fenners, my flat flooded the other day so I'm having to stay at me mom n dads at the minute, it'll be tough and go as to whether I'm back home to watch either fight

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    4,412
    Mentioned
    93 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    987
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Just because it has always been the way does not make it right.

    There should be standard for PPV level which should be world class fighters fighting one another or unification of major belts. Greedy promoters and their personal rivalries have resulted in poor PPV’s fights which have gradually got worse and now they are putting them on at the same time. There is no real choice for boxing fans who want to watch the fight live on the screen - pay or stream it.

    No real choice for boxing fans? Is that a joke? You watch illegal streams every single week regardless of whether or not it's the most famous fighters in the world - Canelo, AJ, Fury, Wilder, GGG - or these "greedy shows" you consider a con.

    You moaners don't buy anything, never have and never will, don't even pretend two PPV's at the same time effect you, or the "standard" matters. You'll be here Saturday night posting to yourself and Batman regardless
    Not too sure on that one Fenners, my flat flooded the other day so I'm having to stay at me mom n dads at the minute, it'll be tough and go as to whether I'm back home to watch either fight
    Maybe you can go round to Kell brooks house :S

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Gotham/Batcave
    Posts
    5,857
    Mentioned
    229 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    674
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    Quote Originally Posted by palmerq View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Batman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Just because it has always been the way does not make it right.

    There should be standard for PPV level which should be world class fighters fighting one another or unification of major belts. Greedy promoters and their personal rivalries have resulted in poor PPV’s fights which have gradually got worse and now they are putting them on at the same time. There is no real choice for boxing fans who want to watch the fight live on the screen - pay or stream it.

    No real choice for boxing fans? Is that a joke? You watch illegal streams every single week regardless of whether or not it's the most famous fighters in the world - Canelo, AJ, Fury, Wilder, GGG - or these "greedy shows" you consider a con.

    You moaners don't buy anything, never have and never will, don't even pretend two PPV's at the same time effect you, or the "standard" matters. You'll be here Saturday night posting to yourself and Batman regardless
    Not too sure on that one Fenners, my flat flooded the other day so I'm having to stay at me mom n dads at the minute, it'll be tough and go as to whether I'm back home to watch either fight
    Maybe you can go round to Kell brooks house :S
    No need, I should be back home tomorrow, I was gunna call our Nige

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Amir khan's bizarre kell brook blast: "there's talk about him being gay"

    You don't half talk some rubbish sometimes, Fenster. I am sure many bought into the early Khan hype and wondered why they had paid extra to see him fight a journeyman after a ridiculously easy contest.

    PPV is a privilege and thus should be no less than 2 elite fighters going at it. For a worker on minimum wage in the UK watching boxing legally is likely beyond reach for many. Whyte Chisora is not PPV worthy. It is a fun fight. But it is not a marquee event. Those early Khan fights were 50 times worse.

    Maybe you have the money but a lot of people who buy into hype like PPV, Chrismas, gambling, etc cannot really afford it. It is a form of fleecing.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Floyd: "amir khan fight makes sense"
    By imp in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-17-2013, 01:15 PM
  2. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-15-2012, 08:54 PM
  3. Hector "Macho" Camacho vs. Amir Khan
    By Hulk in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-05-2011, 03:12 AM
  4. Replies: 48
    Last Post: 01-27-2010, 08:00 PM
  5. Replies: 65
    Last Post: 09-19-2008, 05:02 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing