NASA says humans could land on Mars in 25 years

[p4pking]

I would normally agree, I hate ad hominem, but what is your argument? Please tell me what scale, that you keep asking for, would do? Mine was way too small. Let’s recreate something the size of the universe then, and see if this holds up? This is a case where ad hominem is the only option

You showed a picture of a drop of water, I don't even know what to say to that. How is that any sort of scale model?

I'm still only on my first point, and not 1 person who believes in a globe, can show me in this reality, how water bends around the exterior of a shape, like it would on a globe. I haven't even mentioned the spinning. But we all know how water works in this reality. You can see this for yourself. But have been brain washed to believe that the properties of water change at a certain point.

All I keep hearing here is excuses as to why a scale model can't be done. But no one realizing the real reason for this. It's because it's not a reality.

Shall we move onto my 2nd request then?

How is it NOT an accurate depiction of a scale model? It’s what you were begging for.....

No it's not. Stop lying.

I asked for a scaled model of the earth, using the same substances, with water conforming to the exterior of a shape.

Are you claiming the earth is a drop of water?

That there is no possible way to create a scaled model of the earth is self evident for most, I would assume.

[Alpha]

I would normally agree, I hate ad hominem, but what is your argument? Please tell me what scale, that you keep asking for, would do? Mine was way too small. Let’s recreate something the size of the universe then, and see if this holds up? This is a case where ad hominem is the only option

You showed a picture of a drop of water, I don't even know what to say to that. How is that any sort of scale model?

I'm still only on my first point, and not 1 person who believes in a globe, can show me in this reality, how water bends around the exterior of a shape, like it would on a globe. I haven't even mentioned the spinning. But we all know how water works in this reality. You can see this for yourself. But have been brain washed to believe that the properties of water change at a certain point.

All I keep hearing here is excuses as to why a scale model can't be done. But no one realizing the real reason for this. It's because it's not a reality.

Shall we move onto my 2nd request then?

How is it NOT an accurate depiction of a scale model? It’s what you were begging for.....

No it's not. Stop lying.

I asked for a scaled model of the earth, using the same substances, with water conforming to the exterior of a shape.

Are you claiming the earth is a drop of water?

That there is no possible way to create a scaled model of the earth is self evident for most, I would assume.

So you want me to just believe you, when you can't show me what you believe to be true, and have never actually seen with your own eyes, but I can show you what water actually does in this reality.

I know it's hard but water destroys the globe.

[Gandalf]

If the earth was flat then surely you would reach an end rather than end up at the same place again if you keep on going long enough. There would have to be an end point rather than the ability to go round and round and end up in the same place. When Palin did Pole to Pole he pretty much documented the full journey. There was no end point where he fell off the earth. You can prove he did it by copying the journey yourself which others have tried to do. If the globe he used to illustrate his journey was cut up and laid flat he could not complete the journey without going back.

[walrus]

If the earth was flat then surely you would reach an end rather than end up at the same place again if you keep on going long enough. There would have to be an end point rather than the ability to go round and round and end up in the same place. When Palin did Pole to Pole he pretty much documented the full journey. There was no end point where he fell off the earth. You can prove he did it by copying the journey yourself which others have tried to do. If the globe he used to illustrate his journey was cut up and laid flat he could not complete the journey without going back.

Miles, don’t be dumb that would be circumnavigation which is impossible. When I go to China I like to take China air as it’s a quick trip, they fly over the North Pole, or that direction at least. The US deems that more risky and flys another direction which proves something I think.

[Gandalf]

If the earth was flat then surely you would reach an end rather than end up at the same place again if you keep on going long enough. There would have to be an end point rather than the ability to go round and round and end up in the same place. When Palin did Pole to Pole he pretty much documented the full journey. There was no end point where he fell off the earth. You can prove he did it by copying the journey yourself which others have tried to do. If the globe he used to illustrate his journey was cut up and laid flat he could not complete the journey without going back.

Miles, don’t be dumb that would be circumnavigation which is impossible. When I go to China I like to take China air as it’s a quick trip, they fly over the North Pole, or that direction at least. The US deems that more risky and flys another direction which proves something I think.

Ah, I am confused around the world in 80 days was the one around the entire globe. Clearly clever camera work and trickery. The Pole to Pole one would support Alpha as WHY WOULD HE NOT GO BACK UP THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE EARTH? There isn't one!