Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli View Post
And yes chocolate can be liquid and at this point I've forgotten what relevance that may have in this head numbing redundancy.

Lets stop using 'flat' disk and instead go with Pizza Earth and surely the differences and disagreements will die out.
Yes Chocolate can be a fluid, but it's water that is claimed to be able to conform to the exterior of a shape.
If a sphere to scale..not sure what that exactly means but there it is..spins at what is to be thought 1000 miles per hour (?). Lets say a normal size globe with consideration to soil, surface and ocean depths and terrain , would surface water not be likely to hold for the most part and rather than just slide off. Oh and gravity and stuff.

the pizza claim is a winner btw
What type of gravity are you talking about?

Would you agree that in our reality, water will always fill it's container and the surface will always be flat?
If I fill a glass from a sink, seems about right. Unless I toss ice cubes in it. Seems to be the same with salt, Nestle quick, sand, cat food and marbles also.
Or if you fill the sink, or a pool or anything else. You may throw in ice cubes but the water will still find it's level and the surface will remain flat. Lets leave that the other stuff out, as the claim of a globe has to be that water (which we are told covers over 70% of the earth's surface) can conform to the exterior of a shape.

Now would you agree that the core of science, should be observable, measurable, testable, and repeatable, using tangible substances. Meaning basically, if I claim something to be a reality, then you would expect me to show you something you could observe, test, measure and repeat yourself?