Quote Originally Posted by smashup View Post
To claim that space, stars, moon etc doesn't exist is insane.
So Alpha is claiming the entire planet (flat or round 😂) is covered by some huge kind of dome that simulates day (clouds/wind/sunshine/rain) and night (dark, moon, stars)
I'd like to see the construction company who built this dome/cover 😁 it's an engineering miracle really when you think it'd have had to be erected thousands or tens of thousands of years ago - before electricity was invented for instance, did they have hand operated work tools i wonder and I'd love to see the scaffold team that built upwards to get it up there 😁
Alpha your a knowledgeable boxing poster but your off your fucking nut if you seriously believe most of what your typing in this thread.
I have never claimed the stars, moon don't exist. But space as they are selling it to you, is fake. The term planet comes from The Greek term asters planetai meant "wandering stars". I have never been up there to do any experiments, or to move around 3 dimensionally, like we can on earth, but from my observations, from very good quality telescopes, the planets look more like pulsing light and not terra firma that you could land on. I'm not sure what keeps these luminaries on their circuits, but I could speculate that it is possible electro magnetism.

I have never claimed there is a dome. I am disputing the globe claim that we can have a pressurized gas particle atmosphere, without a barrier, membrane, container to create that pressure.

What's nuts is believing water can confirm to the exterior of a shape, without being able to provide a practical demonstrative of this. That's nuts.

What's nuts is believing you can create a pressurized gas atmosphere without some sort of barrier or container, again, without being able to provide a practical demonstration of this.

What's nuts is believing a pressurized gas atmosphere can exist right beside a vacuum (one we can't even recreate on earth), without the higher energy moving into the lower energy. Again without being able to provide a practical demonstration.

What's nuts is believing in curvature, that you can't see or measure.

What's nuts is believing that the earth is in motion, when no experiment has ever detected this motion.

What's nuts is believing in a magical force, one that you cannot observe anywhere in nature, or provide a practical experiment for.

Not one person here has been able to provide something quantifiable for the globe.

But you all continue to defend your beliefs, not realizing it's basically a religion.