Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  6
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,381
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    765
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Everyone will want Spence after this because he becomes a PPV fighter after this. Bob is saying what we all know. The question is what does Crawford offer Spence? Why would Haymon do it, he can match his PPV fighter against his names in PPVs or he can match him against Bob’s name, the choice is obvious. And we all know how Bob would do it if roles were reversed.

    Let’s hope Haymon doesn’t act like Bob would and he says “F it, let’s get best against best” and let’s hope Bob realizes who deserves the lions share
    Funny that . When we’re talking about GGG and Canelo, or AJ/ Wilder , its all about “I just want to see the fights man, the best fighting the best!” But when it comes to Spence / Crawford, you’re all about A side & B sides and who’s worth what! #backstroke #doublestandard.
    Former Undisputed 4 belt Prediction champion. Still P4P and People’s Champion.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    695
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Everyone will want Spence after this because he becomes a PPV fighter after this. Bob is saying what we all know. The question is what does Crawford offer Spence? Why would Haymon do it, he can match his PPV fighter against his names in PPVs or he can match him against Bob’s name, the choice is obvious. And we all know how Bob would do it if roles were reversed.

    Let’s hope Haymon doesn’t act like Bob would and he says “F it, let’s get best against best” and let’s hope Bob realizes who deserves the lions share
    Funny that . When we’re talking about GGG and Canelo, or AJ/ Wilder , its all about “I just want to see the fights man, the best fighting the best!” But when it comes to Spence / Crawford, you’re all about A side & B sides and who’s worth what! #backstroke #doublestandard.
    Can you read? Because that’s the opposite of what the words I wrote mean. My stance is exactly the same. But continue talking nonsense please, I appreciate the consistency

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    695
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

    I’ll dumb this down because apparently Primo struggles with English.

    I hope Spence doesn’t act like GGG and AJ and makes the good fights

    I hope Haymon doesn’t act like Bob and delay a fight for years because he can.

    There, do you understand now?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,381
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    765
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    I’ll dumb this down because apparently Primo struggles with English.

    I hope Spence doesn’t act like GGG and AJ and makes the good fights

    I hope Haymon doesn’t act like Bob and delay a fight for years because he can.

    There, do you understand now?
    “The question is what does Crawford offer Spence?” & “let’s hope Bob realizes who deserves the lions share” Yep, clear as mud! other people might think you are talking like a complete fucking plank, but not me , I’m so appreciative of you “dumbing it down for me”

    While you’re “clearing things up”, could you let us know your thoughts regarding the fact that Wilder had a broken arm at the time that his team were throwing around $50 Million offers to Joshua ?
    I have previously asked for your thoughts on this 5 or 6 times , because I value your opinion so much, but you must’ve missed those posts.
    Tell you what, I’ll @Ron Swanson you in so you don’t miss it.
    So if history has anything to do with it, we’ll hear from you in about 2 or 3 weeks! All the best.
    Former Undisputed 4 belt Prediction champion. Still P4P and People’s Champion.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    695
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

    Yes Primo I don’t come in here and explain everything to you because you are a petulant child. Proven by your 12 year old girl hashtags.

    Deontay didn’t have a broken arm as far as I know. I know he said it but broken can mean different things. Remember when Tyson has “a broken back”? Do you think ANY commission would let Tyson fight with a broken back? No, it wasn’t broken.

    You want to make it about absolutely irrelevant things because you want desperately to avoid the facts. So let’s avoid your avoidance and talk like adults, with facts.

    I want Spence/Crawford, fact. So, let’s look at the participants and how they operate. We can look at a recent example. We have Wilder/Fury set to happen and Bob Arum got involved. Suddenly the immediate rematch was offered not as an immediate rematch but with it a 3 fight deal for Bob and he chooses a fight in between. That’s Bob. That’s what happened. That’s what has happened literally thousands of times before that happened this week. Now, don’t be a child, look at this and consider, what do you expect to happen in Spence/Crawford negotiations?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    8,381
    Mentioned
    99 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    765
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Yes Primo I don’t come in here and explain everything to you because you are a petulant child. Proven by your 12 year old girl hashtags.

    Deontay didn’t have a broken arm as far as I know. I know he said it but broken can mean different things. Remember when Tyson has “a broken back”? Do you think ANY commission would let Tyson fight with a broken back? No, it wasn’t broken.

    You want to make it about absolutely irrelevant things because you want desperately to avoid the facts. So let’s avoid your avoidance and talk like adults, with facts.

    I want Spence/Crawford, fact. So, let’s look at the participants and how they operate. We can look at a recent example. We have Wilder/Fury set to happen and Bob Arum got involved. Suddenly the immediate rematch was offered not as an immediate rematch but with it a 3 fight deal for Bob and he chooses a fight in between. That’s Bob. That’s what happened. That’s what has happened literally thousands of times before that happened this week. Now, don’t be a child, look at this and consider, what do you expect to happen in Spence/Crawford negotiations?
    Firstly , at least the hash tags worked as they highlighted your actions. Although I'm not "down with the kids" I think they are commonly used in this way nowadays , and not just by 12 year old girls. Probably only the ones you know, but I digress.
    Secondly , I deliberately worded it so that I wasn't asking you the question , merely your opinion on the "Wilder Broken arm" issue. the reason being because I know you would deflect away from answering the question by saying something like "why do I have to answer your questions, who do you think you are ?" as if I'm not worthy of asking you a question.
    Well in reality , this is a forum and if someone asks you a question , you should be man enough to answer with your opinion , whether it's right or wrong. Not throw some hissy fit like a pussy because you haven't got an answer.
    I made this point and asked your opinion half a dozen times over a period of months before you felt it was worthy of some sort of response.
    Thirdly , you've had all this time to think of an answer and the best you can come up with is "he said he had a broken arm , but he didn't!" and use Mike Tyson as proof of what you're saying!
    so now, you're telling Wilder what he had and what he didn't have? Wilder said he had "Surgery" as well. is this wrong as well? because if it is :
    a. have you spoken to Wilder about it? and
    b. If Wilder lied about this, then he can lie about his bogus, pathetic $50 Million offer.
    on this point, you've probably seen the Hearn/Espinoza bullshit in the last few days on Social Media, where Espinoza said "Wilder sent the offer to Hearn by e-mail" WILDER SENT IT!
    so , does Deontay Wilder has $50 Million in the Bank that he can send over offers like this? I'm asking you because if you know that he never had a Broken arm when he says he did, then you should know this also.
    what kind of argument is "he SAID he had a Broken arm, but he never?"
    the upshot is , that Wilder and his team are a bunch of fucking clowns, and if you believe anything they say , then you're an even bigger clown! BUT WAIT, you don't believe what they say, because when Wilder says he broke his arm and had surgery, you don't believe it
    Now, Back to the original subject of Spence / Crawford . I'm not going into great detail because this post is long enough, but when it suits you started talking about A sides & B Sides , but on other occasions you paint a different picture.
    apologies everyone for such a long boring post, but as far as I'm concerned Ronnie baby, you don't have to answer it anyway because everything that you write is horseshit and smoke and mirrors anyway, and I can't be bothered to keep putting you right!
    Former Undisputed 4 belt Prediction champion. Still P4P and People’s Champion.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    695
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Yes Primo I don’t come in here and explain everything to you because you are a petulant child. Proven by your 12 year old girl hashtags.

    Deontay didn’t have a broken arm as far as I know. I know he said it but broken can mean different things. Remember when Tyson has “a broken back”? Do you think ANY commission would let Tyson fight with a broken back? No, it wasn’t broken.

    You want to make it about absolutely irrelevant things because you want desperately to avoid the facts. So let’s avoid your avoidance and talk like adults, with facts.

    I want Spence/Crawford, fact. So, let’s look at the participants and how they operate. We can look at a recent example. We have Wilder/Fury set to happen and Bob Arum got involved. Suddenly the immediate rematch was offered not as an immediate rematch but with it a 3 fight deal for Bob and he chooses a fight in between. That’s Bob. That’s what happened. That’s what has happened literally thousands of times before that happened this week. Now, don’t be a child, look at this and consider, what do you expect to happen in Spence/Crawford negotiations?
    Firstly , at least the hash tags worked as they highlighted your actions. Although I'm not "down with the kids" I think they are commonly used in this way nowadays , and not just by 12 year old girls. Probably only the ones you know, but I digress.
    Secondly , I deliberately worded it so that I wasn't asking you the question , merely your opinion on the "Wilder Broken arm" issue. the reason being because I know you would deflect away from answering the question by saying something like "why do I have to answer your questions, who do you think you are ?" as if I'm not worthy of asking you a question.
    Well in reality , this is a forum and if someone asks you a question , you should be man enough to answer with your opinion , whether it's right or wrong. Not throw some hissy fit like a pussy because you haven't got an answer.
    I made this point and asked your opinion half a dozen times over a period of months before you felt it was worthy of some sort of response.
    Thirdly , you've had all this time to think of an answer and the best you can come up with is "he said he had a broken arm , but he didn't!" and use Mike Tyson as proof of what you're saying!
    so now, you're telling Wilder what he had and what he didn't have? Wilder said he had "Surgery" as well. is this wrong as well? because if it is :
    a. have you spoken to Wilder about it? and
    b. If Wilder lied about this, then he can lie about his bogus, pathetic $50 Million offer.
    on this point, you've probably seen the Hearn/Espinoza bullshit in the last few days on Social Media, where Espinoza said "Wilder sent the offer to Hearn by e-mail" WILDER SENT IT!
    so , does Deontay Wilder has $50 Million in the Bank that he can send over offers like this? I'm asking you because if you know that he never had a Broken arm when he says he did, then you should know this also.
    what kind of argument is "he SAID he had a Broken arm, but he never?"
    the upshot is , that Wilder and his team are a bunch of fucking clowns, and if you believe anything they say , then you're an even bigger clown! BUT WAIT, you don't believe what they say, because when Wilder says he broke his arm and had surgery, you don't believe it
    Now, Back to the original subject of Spence / Crawford . I'm not going into great detail because this post is long enough, but when it suits you started talking about A sides & B Sides , but on other occasions you paint a different picture.
    apologies everyone for such a long boring post, but as far as I'm concerned Ronnie baby, you don't have to answer it anyway because everything that you write is horseshit and smoke and mirrors anyway, and I can't be bothered to keep putting you right!
    You accuse me of something and you do what you accuse me of in the exact same post! You say I don’t answer a completely pointless question. I answer. Then you dodge a completely legitimate and relevant question.

    Do you think Bob will do what he does every single time or not? Dodge again because the answer doesn’t support your baseless opinion.

    If you think I spend weeks thinking about things you say you are deranged. But that gets us off the facts so your purpose is filled right? Always talking about irrelevant stuff to avoid the facts

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    16,336
    Mentioned
    680 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    919
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Everyone will want Spence after this because he becomes a PPV fighter after this. Bob is saying what we all know. The question is what does Crawford offer Spence? Why would Haymon do it, he can match his PPV fighter against his names in PPVs or he can match him against Bob’s name, the choice is obvious. And we all know how Bob would do it if roles were reversed.

    Let’s hope Haymon doesn’t act like Bob would and he says “F it, let’s get best against best” and let’s hope Bob realizes who deserves the lions share
    Funny that . When we’re talking about GGG and Canelo, or AJ/ Wilder , its all about “I just want to see the fights man, the best fighting the best!” But when it comes to Spence / Crawford, you’re all about A side & B sides and who’s worth what! #backstroke #doublestandard.
    This is Prime Primo bringing out old school boxing hitting @Ron Swanson with everything but the kitchen sink. Swanson on his chair in the corner his team is about to throw the towel.... but wait, Swanson waved them off, he is getting up. He will probably lose but he has the heart of a chump...er.....I mean champ

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,073
    Mentioned
    75 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    695
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Everyone will want Spence after this because he becomes a PPV fighter after this. Bob is saying what we all know. The question is what does Crawford offer Spence? Why would Haymon do it, he can match his PPV fighter against his names in PPVs or he can match him against Bob’s name, the choice is obvious. And we all know how Bob would do it if roles were reversed.

    Let’s hope Haymon doesn’t act like Bob would and he says “F it, let’s get best against best” and let’s hope Bob realizes who deserves the lions share
    Funny that . When we’re talking about GGG and Canelo, or AJ/ Wilder , its all about “I just want to see the fights man, the best fighting the best!” But when it comes to Spence / Crawford, you’re all about A side & B sides and who’s worth what! #backstroke #doublestandard.
    This is Prime Primo bringing out old school boxing hitting @Ron Swanson with everything but the kitchen sink. Swanson on his chair in the corner his team is about to throw the towel.... but wait, Swanson waved them off, he is getting up. He will probably lose but he has the heart of a chump...er.....I mean champ
    I like that you say Prime Primo and quote him completely changing what was said. Indeed, Prime Primo

    I don’t believe he actually doesn’t understand, it’s just an act to have a fight. I give him the benefit of the doubt.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,556
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    776
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

    I hope the fight happens, but from a business standpoint Haymon is in the better position and it really doesn’t make much sense for him. Haymon has Thurman, Garcia, and Porter available to fight each other. Arum doesn’t really have anyone he can pit against Crawford, so I don’t see Al making the fight.

    Kind of sad for me- since I can remember the promoters have been Arum, King, and the Duvas. Golden boy hit a peak in the 2000s, but honestly hasn’t been the same since Schaefer left. These days it is pretty much PBC/Haymon dominating everything on the US scene, with Hearn starting to try and break in.

    Back to the fight though, there isn’t a bigger fight to make and I hope Haymon and Arum behave like King and Arum did when Tito/Oscar was the biggest fight to make. Definitely NOT like Arum/Mayweather or Rock Newman.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    684
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

    I rarely like fights to marinate, but I would like for each of them to at least fight one of the top guys at welterweight first. Maybe each best two guys. So Spence beats Porter and Thurman and Crawford beats Garcia and Pacquiao.

    I know that’s just extremely wishful thinking, but this is one of the few fights I wouldn’t mind marinating a bit so that it would become even bigger.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,791
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2030
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    I rarely like fights to marinate, but I would like for each of them to at least fight one of the top guys at welterweight first. Maybe each best two guys. So Spence beats Porter and Thurman and Crawford beats Garcia and Pacquiao.

    I know that’s just extremely wishful thinking, but this is one of the few fights I wouldn’t mind marinating a bit so that it would become even bigger.

    I would like a few million dollars and a beachside mansion... but that ain't gonna happen either. No, I know.... that would be ideal. But even if that was the plan, one of the two is bound to trip up on the way to that superstar showdown. In that Wonderland scenario you just painted, it would probably be Crawford.

    Marinating makes some sense here, because neither has fought the Porters, Thurmans or Garcias..... and age still isn't a factor for either. Let's hope the promoters don't ruin this potential mega-fight, like they've ruined a few others in the past.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    684
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by powerpuncher View Post
    I rarely like fights to marinate, but I would like for each of them to at least fight one of the top guys at welterweight first. Maybe each best two guys. So Spence beats Porter and Thurman and Crawford beats Garcia and Pacquiao.

    I know that’s just extremely wishful thinking, but this is one of the few fights I wouldn’t mind marinating a bit so that it would become even bigger.

    I would like a few million dollars and a beachside mansion... but that ain't gonna happen either. No, I know.... that would be ideal. But even if that was the plan, one of the two is bound to trip up on the way to that superstar showdown. In that Wonderland scenario you just painted, it would probably be Crawford.

    Marinating makes some sense here, because neither has fought the Porters, Thurmans or Garcias..... and age still isn't a factor for either. Let's hope the promoters don't ruin this potential mega-fight, like they've ruined a few others in the past.
    The main reason I want it to marinate is because, although I think both are excellent fighters, neither of them has superb resumes. I think it could prove them both completely legit and become a Leonard/Duran level of fight. Right now, both are very good but still have a bit left to prove.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Errol Spence vs Mikey Garcia
    By Freedom in forum Fight Threads
    Replies: 265
    Last Post: 04-07-2019, 02:55 AM
  2. Errol Spence Jr.
    By Master in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 09-09-2017, 07:28 AM
  3. Manny Pacquiao vs. Errol Spence Jr.
    By VG_Addict in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-31-2017, 04:37 AM
  4. Kell Brook v Errol Spence
    By Master in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-25-2016, 10:45 AM
  5. Errol Spence Jr. vs Leonard Bundu on NBC!
    By Spicoli in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 09-02-2016, 06:27 AM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing