Errol Spence v Terence Crawford

[Ron Swanson]

Everyone will want Spence after this because he becomes a PPV fighter after this. Bob is saying what we all know. The question is what does Crawford offer Spence? Why would Haymon do it, he can match his PPV fighter against his names in PPVs or he can match him against Bob’s name, the choice is obvious. And we all know how Bob would do it if roles were reversed.

Let’s hope Haymon doesn’t act like Bob would and he says “F it, let’s get best against best” and let’s hope Bob realizes who deserves the lions share

Funny that . When we’re talking about GGG and Canelo, or AJ/ Wilder , its all about “I just want to see the fights man, the best fighting the best!” But when it comes to Spence / Crawford, you’re all about A side & B sides and who’s worth what! #backstroke #doublestandard.

Can you read? Because that’s the opposite of what the words I wrote mean. My stance is exactly the same. But continue talking nonsense please, I appreciate the consistency

[Ron Swanson]

I’ll dumb this down because apparently Primo struggles with English.

I hope Spence doesn’t act like GGG and AJ and makes the good fights

I hope Haymon doesn’t act like Bob and delay a fight for years because he can.

There, do you understand now?

[Primo Carnera]

I’ll dumb this down because apparently Primo struggles with English.

I hope Spence doesn’t act like GGG and AJ and makes the good fights

I hope Haymon doesn’t act like Bob and delay a fight for years because he can.

There, do you understand now?

“The question is what does Crawford offer Spence?” & “let’s hope Bob realizes who deserves the lions share” Yep, clear as mud! other people might think you are talking like a complete fucking plank, but not me , I’m so appreciative of you “dumbing it down for me”

While you’re “clearing things up”, could you let us know your thoughts regarding the fact that Wilder had a broken arm at the time that his team were throwing around $50 Million offers to Joshua ?
I have previously asked for your thoughts on this 5 or 6 times , because I value your opinion so much, but you must’ve missed those posts.
Tell you what, I’ll @Ron Swanson you in so you don’t miss it.
So if history has anything to do with it, we’ll hear from you in about 2 or 3 weeks! All the best.

[Ron Swanson]

Yes Primo I don’t come in here and explain everything to you because you are a petulant child. Proven by your 12 year old girl hashtags.

Deontay didn’t have a broken arm as far as I know. I know he said it but broken can mean different things. Remember when Tyson has “a broken back”? Do you think ANY commission would let Tyson fight with a broken back? No, it wasn’t broken.

You want to make it about absolutely irrelevant things because you want desperately to avoid the facts. So let’s avoid your avoidance and talk like adults, with facts.

I want Spence/Crawford, fact. So, let’s look at the participants and how they operate. We can look at a recent example. We have Wilder/Fury set to happen and Bob Arum got involved. Suddenly the immediate rematch was offered not as an immediate rematch but with it a 3 fight deal for Bob and he chooses a fight in between. That’s Bob. That’s what happened. That’s what has happened literally thousands of times before that happened this week. Now, don’t be a child, look at this and consider, what do you expect to happen in Spence/Crawford negotiations?

[Primo Carnera]

Yes Primo I don’t come in here and explain everything to you because you are a petulant child. Proven by your 12 year old girl hashtags.

Deontay didn’t have a broken arm as far as I know. I know he said it but broken can mean different things. Remember when Tyson has “a broken back”? Do you think ANY commission would let Tyson fight with a broken back? No, it wasn’t broken.

You want to make it about absolutely irrelevant things because you want desperately to avoid the facts. So let’s avoid your avoidance and talk like adults, with facts.

I want Spence/Crawford, fact. So, let’s look at the participants and how they operate. We can look at a recent example. We have Wilder/Fury set to happen and Bob Arum got involved. Suddenly the immediate rematch was offered not as an immediate rematch but with it a 3 fight deal for Bob and he chooses a fight in between. That’s Bob. That’s what happened. That’s what has happened literally thousands of times before that happened this week. Now, don’t be a child, look at this and consider, what do you expect to happen in Spence/Crawford negotiations?

Firstly , at least the hash tags worked as they highlighted your actions. Although I'm not "down with the kids" I think they are commonly used in this way nowadays , and not just by 12 year old girls. Probably only the ones you know, but I digress.
Secondly , I deliberately worded it so that I wasn't asking you the question , merely your opinion on the "Wilder Broken arm" issue. the reason being because I know you would deflect away from answering the question by saying something like "why do I have to answer your questions, who do you think you are ?" as if I'm not worthy of asking you a question.
Well in reality , this is a forum and if someone asks you a question , you should be man enough to answer with your opinion , whether it's right or wrong. Not throw some hissy fit like a pussy because you haven't got an answer.
I made this point and asked your opinion half a dozen times over a period of months before you felt it was worthy of some sort of response.
Thirdly , you've had all this time to think of an answer and the best you can come up with is "he said he had a broken arm , but he didn't!" and use Mike Tyson as proof of what you're saying!
so now, you're telling Wilder what he had and what he didn't have? Wilder said he had "Surgery" as well. is this wrong as well? because if it is :
a. have you spoken to Wilder about it? and
b. If Wilder lied about this, then he can lie about his bogus, pathetic $50 Million offer.
on this point, you've probably seen the Hearn/Espinoza bullshit in the last few days on Social Media, where Espinoza said "Wilder sent the offer to Hearn by e-mail" WILDER SENT IT!
so , does Deontay Wilder has $50 Million in the Bank that he can send over offers like this? I'm asking you because if you know that he never had a Broken arm when he says he did, then you should know this also.
what kind of argument is "he SAID he had a Broken arm, but he never?"
the upshot is , that Wilder and his team are a bunch of fucking clowns, and if you believe anything they say , then you're an even bigger clown! BUT WAIT, you don't believe what they say, because when Wilder says he broke his arm and had surgery, you don't believe it
Now, Back to the original subject of Spence / Crawford . I'm not going into great detail because this post is long enough, but when it suits you started talking about A sides & B Sides , but on other occasions you paint a different picture.
apologies everyone for such a long boring post, but as far as I'm concerned Ronnie baby, you don't have to answer it anyway because everything that you write is horseshit and smoke and mirrors anyway, and I can't be bothered to keep putting you right!

[Ron Swanson]

Yes Primo I don’t come in here and explain everything to you because you are a petulant child. Proven by your 12 year old girl hashtags.

Deontay didn’t have a broken arm as far as I know. I know he said it but broken can mean different things. Remember when Tyson has “a broken back”? Do you think ANY commission would let Tyson fight with a broken back? No, it wasn’t broken.

You want to make it about absolutely irrelevant things because you want desperately to avoid the facts. So let’s avoid your avoidance and talk like adults, with facts.

I want Spence/Crawford, fact. So, let’s look at the participants and how they operate. We can look at a recent example. We have Wilder/Fury set to happen and Bob Arum got involved. Suddenly the immediate rematch was offered not as an immediate rematch but with it a 3 fight deal for Bob and he chooses a fight in between. That’s Bob. That’s what happened. That’s what has happened literally thousands of times before that happened this week. Now, don’t be a child, look at this and consider, what do you expect to happen in Spence/Crawford negotiations?

Firstly , at least the hash tags worked as they highlighted your actions. Although I'm not "down with the kids" I think they are commonly used in this way nowadays , and not just by 12 year old girls. Probably only the ones you know, but I digress.
Secondly , I deliberately worded it so that I wasn't asking you the question , merely your opinion on the "Wilder Broken arm" issue. the reason being because I know you would deflect away from answering the question by saying something like "why do I have to answer your questions, who do you think you are ?" as if I'm not worthy of asking you a question.
Well in reality , this is a forum and if someone asks you a question , you should be man enough to answer with your opinion , whether it's right or wrong. Not throw some hissy fit like a pussy because you haven't got an answer.
I made this point and asked your opinion half a dozen times over a period of months before you felt it was worthy of some sort of response.
Thirdly , you've had all this time to think of an answer and the best you can come up with is "he said he had a broken arm , but he didn't!" and use Mike Tyson as proof of what you're saying!
so now, you're telling Wilder what he had and what he didn't have? Wilder said he had "Surgery" as well. is this wrong as well? because if it is :
a. have you spoken to Wilder about it? and
b. If Wilder lied about this, then he can lie about his bogus, pathetic $50 Million offer.
on this point, you've probably seen the Hearn/Espinoza bullshit in the last few days on Social Media, where Espinoza said "Wilder sent the offer to Hearn by e-mail" WILDER SENT IT!
so , does Deontay Wilder has $50 Million in the Bank that he can send over offers like this? I'm asking you because if you know that he never had a Broken arm when he says he did, then you should know this also.
what kind of argument is "he SAID he had a Broken arm, but he never?"
the upshot is , that Wilder and his team are a bunch of fucking clowns, and if you believe anything they say , then you're an even bigger clown! BUT WAIT, you don't believe what they say, because when Wilder says he broke his arm and had surgery, you don't believe it
Now, Back to the original subject of Spence / Crawford . I'm not going into great detail because this post is long enough, but when it suits you started talking about A sides & B Sides , but on other occasions you paint a different picture.
apologies everyone for such a long boring post, but as far as I'm concerned Ronnie baby, you don't have to answer it anyway because everything that you write is horseshit and smoke and mirrors anyway, and I can't be bothered to keep putting you right!

You accuse me of something and you do what you accuse me of in the exact same post! You say I don’t answer a completely pointless question. I answer. Then you dodge a completely legitimate and relevant question.

Do you think Bob will do what he does every single time or not? Dodge again because the answer doesn’t support your baseless opinion.

If you think I spend weeks thinking about things you say you are deranged. But that gets us off the facts so your purpose is filled right? Always talking about irrelevant stuff to avoid the facts

[Ron Swanson]

Question for Primo because I would like to understand his support of ducking. If it is situational or if he always supports ducking

How did you feel about Stevenson moving to Showtime?

How did you feel about Kovalev pulling out of the purse bid with Stevenson?

How did you feel about Pacquiao pulling out of the agreement with Mayweather in 2010?

How did you feel about Frampton saying he wasn’t considering fighting Rigo and never would fight him when Rigo was on top?

How did you feel about Bowe dumping his belt in the trash to duck LL?

Please don’t change the subject, I’m actually curious about this. I’m not curious about spin.