Is the earth flat?

[Alpha]

Where in the natural world can we observe gas pressure being created without a container?

It's called science Tito, NASA is now even trying to give you an out. But the question still remains. What's the definition of gas pressure? Where in the physical and natural world can we observe and experiment with gas pressure being created without a container?

No it's not, Alpha. It's called parroting. I've given you the air pressure gradient explanation umpteen times and you continue to parrot the same question, as in hopes that if you ask it enough times without acknowledging the answers being given you, it will prove you right. Sort of like a grown-up version of holding your breath until you turn blue.

Just because you refuse to accept proven FACTS does not prove your assertions.

It's like when, after admitting that you hadn't studied spherical geometry, you continued to argue with me against the FACT that PI was not a constant and could change in spherical geometry.

You continue to mention air pressure, but refuse to accept the scientific FACT that the pressure of a gas is the force that the gas exerts on the walls of its container.

Now I know your ego or possibly the indoctrination will not let accept these FACTS, even though you can't prove your belief and assertions. You'll search far and wide to try and find an explanation/ definition that leaves out the word container, so it will fit your agenda. But the FACT is that Science is the study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. So to prove the claim of the globe, that we have a gaseous atmosphere, created without a container, it needs to be observed and experimented with in the the physical and natural world, proving that claim can actually occur. Otherwise it can't be scientifically proven.

I'll leave it there, I mean no offense to you, but you seem to suffer heavily from dunning kruger. I have seen you argue pointlessly with others (Fenster for example) over petty stuff, it's like an obsession that you need to be right, or maybe just your ego won't let things go. Unfortunately you can't argue against FACTS or objective reality. I hope you can realize the difference between a belief and a proven FACT, we all should be able to drop our beliefs in a heartbeat if new proven evidence/ information comes to our attention.

If someone came to me and was able to prove the globe claims I am disputing, using actual science, I would have no problem accepting the proven FACTS presented and happily accept the globe model. Unfortunately once you really start to research the model, going back to Eratosthenes, Aristarchus, Copernicus, Newton, Einstein etc you will find there was very little science involved, and more assumptions, assertions and equations, really pseudoscience. Don't take my word for it. Research it for yourself. Look up the first step in the scientific method, and the definition of science, then apply that to these guys' claims. It should become apparent pretty quickly.