Chris Eubank Snr v Chris Eubank Jnr

[Primo Carnera]

Who would win at their peak?

What would be the result?

Senior on points. Levels.

[Gandalf]

Erm....erm....I think....erm that... erm...you know....erm....flaming sambuca....you know...erm....Tommy....Eubank Snr....erm...you know...easy erm win. I am the....erm Panodrama. Burp!

[p4pking]

Flaming sambuca? What are you 13?

In all honesty it would probably be a close fight, guys get better and Eubank sr was/is overrated. I’m actually going to start rooting for jr, because I sort of never factored in how difficult it would have been for him growing up with his dad. That guy is a ridiculous person.

[Gandalf]

Erm no...erm you know....erm much older....champagne too as I am...err sophisticated unlike the...erm cannibal Lectors. I would do Eubank erm better than Louis. But erm easy you know...erm by points. 10rounds to erm 2....erm Snr. Stalin was erm not so bad. Erm joke.

[Dark Lord Al]

Jr wins on points as he has a far better workrate.

[Spicoli]

Sr strikes me more solid with better instinct, punch and chin. Jr did well but he beat an already hobbled and worn man. And besides..good teachers don't show students every single trick . And Miles are you having a stroke mate .

[Master]

Whilst Chris Eubank Senior was not the best of his generation. I believe James Toney, Roy Jones and Mike McCallum would have certainly beaten him and Herol Graham and Kalambay would have done as well. Senior did beat Benn and Watson and these fighters were a lot better than anyone Junior has beaten.

Junior footwork is poor and the only thing he is better than his dad is his work rate and stamina. If they fought Junior would try and outwork Senior but the straight punches from dad would be simply too much for his son. Senior would win on points.