Personally I think this author likes the sound of his own voice too much.

Now I know this is rich coming from me as some of my own posts are mini epics but seriously two full pages anal-ising every significant Calzaghe fight is OTT even for me :P

Plus he contradicts himself completely. He dismisses Calzaghe's win over Lacy saying that a career must be defined by what you achieve over an entire career and then concludes by saying Calzaghe is 3 fights away from 'legendary' status.

Ok right, so an entire career can be summarised in 3 fights then not a whole career after all.

And if 3 wins give him legendary status, I presume it takes less than all 3 to be considered as possibly Britain's best, seeing as Britain is only a small Island occupying probably less than 1% of the earths landmass.

So how many to be considered Britains best, well maybe 1 huge win............like over Lacy for example? :P

Plus 41 other straight wins would help.

Seriously if he doesn't think Calzaghe is Britain's best I'd love to know who he thinks is.

Obviously it cant be Eubank seeing as he was only a B fighter according to Evans, so thats also Benn, Watson and Collins out.............