"London is no longer an English city" - John Cleese exposes himself as evil "racist"

[Denilson-The-Comeback]

Nowadays, I try my best to not respond or engage with your delusional, ranting and unpleasant threads - especially since you have never answered my questions or even responded to any of my points properly (in 'transmit' mode, too busy copying and pasting stuff to debate [/COLOR])

Ad Hominen don't attacks don't means anything. Your just babbling with what you wrote here and getting over emotional. I don't get into childish insults. When someone start with personal insults I don't take them seriously.

Notice when I debate I never get personal. But this is common tactic that white supremacists use.

However, where do you get your facts from? Facts are facts and will remain binary and constant despite people trying to twist them to suit a preconceived agenda.

Yes and white supremacist create facts which are false all the time.

The Chinese did invent gunpowder, but were using it for military purposes - i.e. Killing people - long before Marco Polo went to the court of the Mongols. There is written evidence it was used as far back as 1000AD in battles. The first chemical description of gunpowder in China appeared in the 11th century, when instructions were given as to how to make fire arrows.

The Muslim world were using gunpowder in war by 1240 - ie killing people. The Mamluks documented its preparation and military use in some detail, and there is cast iron evidence for this.

Marco Polo went to China in the 1260's.

You are factually incorrect. What you said is untrue. It is not an alternative fact. Just a falsehood.
[/COLOR]

OK. So the floor is yours : Show me evidence that the Chinese used gunpowder to same extent that whites used it to kill millions to go over to other countries and kill and oppress millions ?

[Gandalf]

Nowadays, I try my best to not respond or engage with your delusional, ranting and unpleasant threads - especially since you have never answered my questions or even responded to any of my points properly (in 'transmit' mode, too busy copying and pasting stuff to debate [/COLOR])

Ad Hominen don't attacks don't means anything. Your just babbling with what you wrote here and getting over emotional. I don't get into childish insults. When someone start with personal insults I don't take them seriously.

Notice when I debate I never get personal. But this is common tactic that white supremacists use.

However, where do you get your facts from? Facts are facts and will remain binary and constant despite people trying to twist them to suit a preconceived agenda.

Yes and white supremacist create facts which are false all the time.

The Chinese did invent gunpowder, but were using it for military purposes - i.e. Killing people - long before Marco Polo went to the court of the Mongols. There is written evidence it was used as far back as 1000AD in battles. The first chemical description of gunpowder in China appeared in the 11th century, when instructions were given as to how to make fire arrows.

The Muslim world were using gunpowder in war by 1240 - ie killing people. The Mamluks documented its preparation and military use in some detail, and there is cast iron evidence for this.

Marco Polo went to China in the 1260's.

You are factually incorrect. What you said is untrue. It is not an alternative fact. Just a falsehood.
[/COLOR]

OK. So the floor is yours : Show me evidence that the Chinese used gunpowder to same extent that whites used it to kill millions to go over to other countries and kill and oppress millions ?

You do realize that X is not white right, Denilson?

[El Kabong]

The Chinese didn't NEED gunpowder to kill millions upon millions they used Communism to off about 70 million in the "Great Leap Forward"

[Denilson-The-Comeback]

The Chinese didn't NEED gunpowder to kill millions upon millions they used Communism to off about 70 million in the "Great Leap Forward"

So we agree the Chinese have not used gunpowder to the same extent that whites have to kill and oppress.

Racism is a systematic way of harming people and that requires power and systems and the collective agreement by the white supremacist to support and participate in the mistreatment of people outside that group.

The only people on the planet who systematically exhibit these kind of behaviours toward people just because they look different (no matter where they go) from North America to Africa to New Zealand and Australia, are white people.

[TitoFan]

The Chinese didn't NEED gunpowder to kill millions upon millions they used Communism to off about 70 million in the "Great Leap Forward"

So we agree the Chinese have not used gunpowder to the same extent that whites have to kill and oppress.

Racism is a systematic way of harming people and that requires power and systems and the collective agreement by the white supremacist to support and participate in the mistreatment of people outside that group.

The only people on the planet who systematically exhibit these kind of behaviours toward people just because they look different (no matter where they go) from North America to Africa to New Zealand and Australia, are white people.

This is better than paying to go to the movies.

[El Kabong]

The Chinese didn't NEED gunpowder to kill millions upon millions they used Communism to off about 70 million in the "Great Leap Forward"

So we agree the Chinese have not used gunpowder to the same extent that whites have to kill and oppress.

Racism is a systematic way of harming people and that requires power and systems and the collective agreement by the white supremacist to support and participate in the mistreatment of people outside that group.

The only people on the planet who systematically exhibit these kind of behaviours toward people just because they look different (no matter where they go) from North America to Africa to New Zealand and Australia, are white people.

No, we don't agree. The Chinese have used gunpowder for killing and oppressing PLENTY. I just stated they didn't even need it to kill 70 million people they just used communism for that. Your hero Julius Malema is a communist too....that can only mean good things

You're an SJW eh? Mr. "Power + Privilege"

[Denilson-The-Comeback]

No, we don't agree. The Chinese have used gunpowder for killing and oppressing PLENTY. I just stated they didn't even need it to kill 70 million people they just used communism for that. Your hero

Have the Chinese used to gunpowder to enact Chinese supremacy across the globe the way whites have for the last 400 years of white supremacy ?

You're an SJW eh? Mr. "Power + Privilege"

There is no such thing as Social Justice Warrior.

The only difference between a white liberal and a white supremacist is the white supremacist would shoot boat load of black ppl down, the white liberal or SJW would give the black people on the boat a cushion the make the drowning easier.

Both of them believe in the same thing.

Julius Malema is a communist too....that can only mean good things

It doesn't matter what the system is white supremacy will cut through it. A white person may be a communist but he's only that way just as long as the white communist is on top and the black communist is on the bottom. It makes no difference the system is.

As for Malema ? "O no. We cant kill black people anymore ? We can't exploit them ? I mean. The sky has falling in !!"

[walrus]

No, we don't agree. The Chinese have used gunpowder for killing and oppressing PLENTY. I just stated they didn't even need it to kill 70 million people they just used communism for that. Your hero

Have the Chinese used to gunpowder to enact Chinese supremacy across the globe the way whites have for the last 400 years of white supremacy ?

You're an SJW eh? Mr. "Power + Privilege"

There is no such thing as Social Justice Warrior.

The only difference between a white liberal and a white supremacist is the white supremacist would shoot boat load of black ppl down, the white liberal or SJW would give the black people on the boat a cushion the make the drowning easier.

Both of them believe in the same thing.

Julius Malema is a communist too....that can only mean good things

It doesn't matter what the system is white supremacy will cut through it. A white person may be a communist but he's only that way just as long as the white communist is on top and the black communist is on the bottom. It makes no difference the system is.

As for Malema ? "O no. We cant kill black people anymore ? We can't exploit them ? I mean. The sky has falling in !!"

So Denison, what African country did you leave because of white supremacy to move to England

[Denilson-The-Comeback]

Nowadays, I try my best to not respond or engage with your delusional, ranting and unpleasant threads - especially since you have never answered my questions or even responded to any of my points properly (in 'transmit' mode, too busy copying and pasting stuff to debate [/COLOR])

Ad Hominen don't attacks don't means anything. Your just babbling with what you wrote here and getting over emotional. I don't get into childish insults. When someone start with personal insults I don't take them seriously.

Notice when I debate I never get personal. But this is common tactic that white supremacists use.

However, where do you get your facts from? Facts are facts and will remain binary and constant despite people trying to twist them to suit a preconceived agenda.

Yes and white supremacist create facts which are false all the time.

The Chinese did invent gunpowder, but were using it for military purposes - i.e. Killing people - long before Marco Polo went to the court of the Mongols. There is written evidence it was used as far back as 1000AD in battles. The first chemical description of gunpowder in China appeared in the 11th century, when instructions were given as to how to make fire arrows.

The Muslim world were using gunpowder in war by 1240 - ie killing people. The Mamluks documented its preparation and military use in some detail, and there is cast iron evidence for this.

Marco Polo went to China in the 1260's.

You are factually incorrect. What you said is untrue. It is not an alternative fact. Just a falsehood.
[/COLOR]

OK. So the floor is yours : Show me evidence that the Chinese used gunpowder to same extent that whites used it to kill millions to go over to other countries and kill and oppress millions ?

You do realize that X is not white right, Denilson?

And that means what ?

Black people have no friends. Everyone hates black people. That's why i hate the term "People Of Color".

It's the world Vs black people.

And I'm 100% fine with that

[Master]

Nowadays, I try my best to not respond or engage with your delusional, ranting and unpleasant threads - especially since you have never answered my questions or even responded to any of my points properly (in 'transmit' mode, too busy copying and pasting stuff to debate [/COLOR])

Ad Hominen don't attacks don't means anything. Your just babbling with what you wrote here and getting over emotional. I don't get into childish insults. When someone start with personal insults I don't take them seriously.

Notice when I debate I never get personal. But this is common tactic that white supremacists use.

However, where do you get your facts from? Facts are facts and will remain binary and constant despite people trying to twist them to suit a preconceived agenda.

Yes and white supremacist create facts which are false all the time.

The Chinese did invent gunpowder, but were using it for military purposes - i.e. Killing people - long before Marco Polo went to the court of the Mongols. There is written evidence it was used as far back as 1000AD in battles. The first chemical description of gunpowder in China appeared in the 11th century, when instructions were given as to how to make fire arrows.

The Muslim world were using gunpowder in war by 1240 - ie killing people. The Mamluks documented its preparation and military use in some detail, and there is cast iron evidence for this.

Marco Polo went to China in the 1260's.

You are factually incorrect. What you said is untrue. It is not an alternative fact. Just a falsehood.
[/COLOR]

OK. So the floor is yours : Show me evidence that the Chinese used gunpowder to same extent that whites used it to kill millions to go over to other countries and kill and oppress millions ?

You do realize that X is not white right, Denilson?

And that means what ?

Black people have no friends. Everyone hates black people. That's why i hate the term "People Of Color".

It's the world Vs black people.

And I'm 100% fine with that

You really mean it is the world against you.

[Beanz]

Nowadays, I try my best to not respond or engage with your delusional, ranting and unpleasant threads - especially since you have never answered my questions or even responded to any of my points properly (in 'transmit' mode, too busy copying and pasting stuff to debate [/COLOR])

Ad Hominen don't attacks don't means anything. Your just babbling with what you wrote here and getting over emotional. I don't get into childish insults. When someone start with personal insults I don't take them seriously.

Notice when I debate I never get personal. But this is common tactic that white supremacists use.

However, where do you get your facts from? Facts are facts and will remain binary and constant despite people trying to twist them to suit a preconceived agenda.

Yes and white supremacist create facts which are false all the time.

The Chinese did invent gunpowder, but were using it for military purposes - i.e. Killing people - long before Marco Polo went to the court of the Mongols. There is written evidence it was used as far back as 1000AD in battles. The first chemical description of gunpowder in China appeared in the 11th century, when instructions were given as to how to make fire arrows.

The Muslim world were using gunpowder in war by 1240 - ie killing people. The Mamluks documented its preparation and military use in some detail, and there is cast iron evidence for this.

Marco Polo went to China in the 1260's.

You are factually incorrect. What you said is untrue. It is not an alternative fact. Just a falsehood.
[/COLOR]

OK. So the floor is yours : Show me evidence that the Chinese used gunpowder to same extent that whites used it to kill millions to go over to other countries and kill and oppress millions ?

You do realize that X is not white right, Denilson?

And that means what ?

Black people have no friends. Everyone hates black people. That's why i hate the term "People Of Color".

It's the world Vs black people.

And I'm 100% fine with that

You really mean it is the world against you.

Really? Sounds familiar

[Gandalf]

Nowadays, I try my best to not respond or engage with your delusional, ranting and unpleasant threads - especially since you have never answered my questions or even responded to any of my points properly (in 'transmit' mode, too busy copying and pasting stuff to debate [/COLOR])

Ad Hominen don't attacks don't means anything. Your just babbling with what you wrote here and getting over emotional. I don't get into childish insults. When someone start with personal insults I don't take them seriously.

Notice when I debate I never get personal. But this is common tactic that white supremacists use.

However, where do you get your facts from? Facts are facts and will remain binary and constant despite people trying to twist them to suit a preconceived agenda.

Yes and white supremacist create facts which are false all the time.

The Chinese did invent gunpowder, but were using it for military purposes - i.e. Killing people - long before Marco Polo went to the court of the Mongols. There is written evidence it was used as far back as 1000AD in battles. The first chemical description of gunpowder in China appeared in the 11th century, when instructions were given as to how to make fire arrows.

The Muslim world were using gunpowder in war by 1240 - ie killing people. The Mamluks documented its preparation and military use in some detail, and there is cast iron evidence for this.

Marco Polo went to China in the 1260's.

You are factually incorrect. What you said is untrue. It is not an alternative fact. Just a falsehood.
[/COLOR]

OK. So the floor is yours : Show me evidence that the Chinese used gunpowder to same extent that whites used it to kill millions to go over to other countries and kill and oppress millions ?

You do realize that X is not white right, Denilson?

And that means what ?

Black people have no friends. Everyone hates black people. That's why i hate the term "People Of Color".

It's the world Vs black people.

And I'm 100% fine with that

Well, to put it in simple terms you are saying that he is advocating white supremacist lines, but he is actually a very successful non-white person. There is nothing stopping black people being successful and many are. Many are of course not too, but there are reasons why. I do not hate black people and would happily have a cup of coffee with X. I would probably take my spray if it was with you.

[X]

OK. So the floor is yours : Show me evidence that the Chinese used gunpowder to same extent that whites used it to kill millions to go over to other countries and kill and oppress millions ?

You didn’t say that. You said this:

Gunpowder. China created it and they only used for peaceful purposes, but when Marco Polo brought it back to Europe, whites used to kill

Those are two different statements. Let’s stick to your original one ... which is factually and evidentially untrue. You just said it earlier as if it was some kind of argument-winning kryptonite.

You can’t effectively build on or develop a thesis on a blatant falsehood and then expect people to take you seriously. Especially if you then try and brazen it out by changing your original assertion as if you never made it.

The whole crumbling edifice of everything you say tumbles down when one of the fundamental ramparts of it are easily demonstrated to be simple falsehoods. That’s how arguments work.

I know you won’t accept or worry about it, because you are pretty stupid.

You will just rant on again with copying and pasting stuff. We all know that. We also know that you are too thick to construct any semblance of a coherent narrative that joins all those plagiarised thoughts together.

Thats why nobody gives any credence to anything you say. Haven’t you worked that out yet (no, of course not )