"London is no longer an English city" - John Cleese exposes himself as evil "racist"

[Denilson-The-Comeback]

And your sitting there getting all scared and worried about what you think is going in London

***You're***

And nah I'm not bothered by what's happening in London as I don't fucking live there. But I'm troubled as to why a nation attempting to gain access to nuclear material by agreeing to a deal with the United States and England et al would ALSO be building massive bombs in one of the nations they just made that very difficult to achieve deal with....and of course now that deal is gone and Iran is not seen in the best of light.


Also I'm troubled by the reporting of the event being 4-5 years after the fact.


As for the rest of your post 70% since 9/11 ....well in 9/11 almost 3,000 people were killed so I guess the completely subjective date they chose isn't telling of some sort of agenda.

And let's have a look at some of these "domestic terror killings" https://www.adl.org/resources/report...#the-incidents
1. Reston, Virginia, December 22, 2017. An accused white supremacist teenager (as a juvenile, his name is being withheld until/unless he is formally charged as an adult) is reported to have killed the parents of his girlfriend before shooting himself, reportedly because they had convinced their daughter to break up with him because of his ostensible white supremacist beliefs.

-So a white supremacist murders other white people and it's a "domestic terror killing"?

2. Greeley, Colorado, August 16, 2017. Kelly Raisley, believed to be a member or associate of the 211 Crew white supremacist gang, was arrested on first-degree murder charges for the murder of his uncle, Randy Gene Baker. Baker’s wife and sister were similarly arrested. The motive was apparently personal.

- White person kills white person "The motive was apparently personal" yet it's listed as a "domestic terror killing"

3. Samish Island, Washington, July 14, 2017. An alt lite conspiracy theorist and vlogger, Lane Maurice Davis, allegedly murdered his father following an argument over Davis’s beliefs.
- https://www.apnews.com/cb638940becf424e8eefda7519f25fa9 "His public defender Adam Yanasak said his client was in intense emotional distress at the time and that an evaluation by forensic psychiatrist Mark McClung showed that a combination of dissociative disorder and Asperger’s syndrome played a role in Lane Davis’ loss of control." ....yet it's a "domestic terror killing"

4. Century Correctional Institution, Florida, June 19, 2017. Robert Hunt, an inmate with white supremacist tattoos, some common to prison gangs, is accused of stabbing to death an African-American inmate, Jorge Slaughter.
- https://www.pnj.com/story/news/2018/...ath/651823002/ ... "Inmates theorized that Slaughter owed Hunt money, or that the two had been in a dispute over contraband narcotics."....yet this is 100% a "domestic terror killing" according to the ADL

5. Putnam County Georgia, June 13, 2017. Ricky Dubose, a member of the Ghostface Gangsters white supremacist prison gang, and another inmate, Donnie Russell Rowe, reportedly killed two corrections officers while trying to escape from a prison bus. They were later recaptured.
- So they were trying to escape and they killed who was in their way....oh yeah totally a "domestic terror killing"

6. Tampa, Florida, May 19, 2017. White supremacist Devon Arthurs allegedly shot to death two of his roommates for making fun of his recent conversion to Islam. All three, and a fourth roommate, were members of Atomwaffen, a neo-Nazi group.
- So he's listed as a white supremacist, but the motive given was that he was being made fun of by his neo-Nazi buddies for (checks notes) converting to Islam ....sooo is this going to fall under the white or the Islam section?

And these are just a few reasons to ask questions and verify information...there's plenty more to go over but you get the picture (well not you Denny, but the others will)

Just give it up. As I've said b4, your not just flogging a dead horse, your whipping the skeleton. I know your gonna defend your people to the max. I get it.

My point is white people (or should I say and more to the point white supremacists) have been the most violent terroristic ppl ever to walk the earth.

The whole country (USA) was founded on terrorism. All terrorism is caused by white supremacy terrorism. Muslim terrorism wouldn’t exist without white supremacy.

[TitoFan]

So tell us more about this White Supremacist Theory of yours, Denilson.

What percentage of white people in your estimation are White Supremacists? 90 percent? 95 percent? (you can use decimal points if you'd like)

Followup question: At what point, on average, does a white child become a White Supremacist? 15 years old? 10? 5? (some other age?)

Other than self-described African-American blacks..... who would you include in the group "blacks"?

Are blacks the only targets of White Supremacists? I would think the answer is no...... but I'd like your own take on this.


I have more questions, but these are a good start.

[walrus]

So tell us more about this White Supremacist Theory of yours, Denilson.

What percentage of white people in your estimation are White Supremacists? 90 percent? 95 percent? (you can use decimal points if you'd like)

Followup question: At what point, on average, does a white child become a White Supremacist? 15 years old? 10? 5? (some other age?)

Other than self-described African-American blacks..... who would you include in the group "blacks"?

Are blacks the only targets of White Supremacists? I would think the answer is no...... but I'd like your own take on this.


I have more questions, but these are a good start.

Tits that question is far to sensible for Big D

[TitoFan]

So tell us more about this White Supremacist Theory of yours, Denilson.

What percentage of white people in your estimation are White Supremacists? 90 percent? 95 percent? (you can use decimal points if you'd like)

Followup question: At what point, on average, does a white child become a White Supremacist? 15 years old? 10? 5? (some other age?)

Other than self-described African-American blacks..... who would you include in the group "blacks"?

Are blacks the only targets of White Supremacists? I would think the answer is no...... but I'd like your own take on this.


I have more questions, but these are a good start.

Tits that question is far to sensible for Big D

Shhh...

I don't want to scare him off.

[Denilson-The-Comeback]

So tell us more about this White Supremacist Theory of yours, Denilson.

OK

What percentage of white people in your estimation are White Supremacists? 90 percent? 95 percent? (you can use decimal points if you'd like)

All. That means I suspect that all white ppl are white supremacists

Why ? Because I can't prove it and because there is no master list of who is and isn't a white supremacist then I'm duty bound to suspect all

Followup question: At what point, on average, does a white child become a White Supremacist? 15 years old? 10? 5? (some other age?)

White children learn very quickly. That whites matter and black people don't and they learn that at a very early age. They may not be able to verbalize it but they understand there system of white supremacy where whites matter.

Other than self-described African-American blacks..... who would you include in the group "blacks"?

I don't know what you mean

Are blacks the only targets of White Supremacists? I would think the answer is no...... but I'd like your own take on this.

Anyone with melanin in their skin. But black people are the ultimate prize. Racist - white supremacy works as a totem pole and black ppl must be at the bottom of that pole and if black people are not at the bottom, then there is problem. Equality is oppression to white supremacists.

[Dark Lord Al]

So tell us more about this White Supremacist Theory of yours, Denilson.

OK

What percentage of white people in your estimation are White Supremacists? 90 percent? 95 percent? (you can use decimal points if you'd like)

All. That means I suspect that all white ppl are white supremacists

Why ? Because I can't prove it and because there is no master list of who is and isn't a white supremacist then I'm duty bound to suspect all

Followup question: At what point, on average, does a white child become a White Supremacist? 15 years old? 10? 5? (some other age?)

White children learn very quickly. That whites matter and black people don't and they learn that at a very early age. They may not be able to verbalize it but they understand there system of white supremacy where whites matter.

Other than self-described African-American blacks..... who would you include in the group "blacks"?

I don't know what you mean

Are blacks the only targets of White Supremacists? I would think the answer is no...... but I'd like your own take on this.

Anyone with melanin in their skin. But black people are the ultimate prize. Racist - white supremacy works as a totem pole and black ppl must be at the bottom of that pole and if black people are not at the bottom, then there is problem. Equality is oppression to white supremacists.

Yes you personally are firmly at the bottom of the gene pool.

[TitoFan]

First of all, thanks for your responses. Here are my own comments:

So tell us more about this White Supremacist Theory of yours, Denilson.

OK

What percentage of white people in your estimation are White Supremacists? 90 percent? 95 percent? (you can use decimal points if you'd like)

All. That means I suspect that all white ppl are white supremacists

Why ? Because I can't prove it and because there is no master list of who is and isn't a white supremacist then I'm duty bound to suspect all


Ok, so "all" being 100 percent. But you DO make the clarification that #1 you "can't prove it", and #2 you "suspect all". "Suspect" being the key word here which by definition leaves room for error. So basically by your own admission there could possibly be a percentage that are not in fact White Supremacists. Would you agree with that statement?

Followup question: At what point, on average, does a white child become a White Supremacist? 15 years old? 10? 5? (some other age?)

White children learn very quickly. That whites matter and black people don't and they learn that at a very early age. They may not be able to verbalize it but they understand there system of white supremacy where whites matter.

To clarify, ALL children learn very quickly, but yes.... white children included. But your 2nd sentence must be taken into the context of your earlier statement where you can't "prove" it, and can only "suspect." So there again there might be some room for error. At this point I would ask what percentage error would you say could be possible in your assessment? Just asking because in statements like this people usually throw in a plus or minus.

Other than self-described African-American blacks..... who would you include in the group "blacks"?

I don't know what you mean

Ok fair enough. What I mean is WHO do you include in the group blacks, who according to you is the bottom of the totem pole with regards to White Supremacists? Because there are blacks from different nationalities and origins. Caribbean blacks yes.... their origin is Africa, as there was a very active slave trade way back when which include all of the Caribbean islands. But what about European blacks, or blacks from other continents that may not have originated in Africa? Also, there is the obvious mix over time that results from mixed marriages and the like. At what point do you draw the line when including people in the black group?

Are blacks the only targets of White Supremacists? I would think the answer is no...... but I'd like your own take on this.

Anyone with melanin in their skin. But black people are the ultimate prize. Racist - white supremacy works as a totem pole and black ppl must be at the bottom of that pole and if black people are not at the bottom, then there is problem. Equality is oppression to white supremacists.

Ok so here you may have touched on part of the previous question as to who do you include in the black group. So basically, the more prevalent the black influence on a mixed race person, regardless of nationality, the lower they are on this totem pole you refer to, right?




Well again, thanks for answering the questions. Needless to say, you are perfectly entitled to your opinion, just like ex-Saddo'er Alpha was perfectly entitled to his opinion about the Earth being flat. Like him, you speak well (definitely have some great boxing opinions) and articulate your views well. But again, needless to say, you're always going to encounter a lot of differing and opposing opinions, many from black people themselves.

We don't know each other personally, but I suspect we'd have some pretty interesting conversations. I probably wouldn't change your mind about these things, but I would certainly try and inject some perspective from my own background and experience. I've seen racism and bigotry up close and first hand (although thankfully not directed at me)...... and yet I've seen enough to come to certain conclusions that not only differ from yours..... but also differ from probably most people on here.

[Denilson-The-Comeback]

Ok, so "all" being 100 percent. But you DO make the clarification that #1 you "can't prove it", and #2 you "suspect all". "Suspect" being the key word here which by definition leaves room for error. So basically by your own admission there could possibly be a percentage that are not in fact White Supremacists. Would you agree with that statement?

If you had a 100 snakes coming at you, 99 were venomous, and one wasn't. Would you stop to try and find the non-venomous one ? Or would you close the door on the lot of them ?

To clarify, ALL children learn very quickly, but yes.... white children included. But your 2nd sentence must be taken into the context of your earlier statement where you can't "prove" it, and can only "suspect." So there again there might be some room for error. At this point I would ask what percentage error would you say could be possible in your assessment? Just asking because in statements like this people usually throw in a plus or minus.

But here's the thing.

The white supremacists are the most powerful. It doesn't really matter if there is a small % of whites who aren't white supremacist. The ones who have the muscle in the world are the white supremacist.

You from P.Rico right ? Well I know if I went to Puerto Rico I'd see the white P.Ricans on top and the black P.Ricans would be on the bottom.

Every area in Puerto Rico were black people live would be the poorest area of town, the least invested area of town, the area of highest unemployment. Then I'd go to the jails and they'd be full of black people. I'd go to the best schools, they be full of mainly white P.Ricans, the best houses, jobs, land, property would all be owned by white P.Ricans. The black P.Ricans would living in the mud without a biscuit and they'd be looked down, seen as ugly, worthless, criminal, violent, backward.

White supremacy is global

And that would true all over S.America. I'd go to Brazil and they just elected a white supremacist president down there, so black Brazillians are gonna catch even more hell. I'd go to Uruguay, Columbia, Ecuador, Panama. Hell - Down there if your black, they'd just do gorilla gestures in the street. There is no filter as far as racism to black people in S.America.

So stop trying to be "the voice of reason", trying to think your kinda smart. I've seen it before many times.

What I mean is WHO do you include in the group blacks, who according to you is the bottom of the totem pole with regards to White Supremacists? Because there are blacks from different nationalities and origins. Caribbean blacks yes.... their origin is Africa, as there was a very active slave trade way back when which include all of the Caribbean islands. But what about European blacks, or blacks from other continents that may not have originated in Africa? Also, there is the obvious mix over time that results from mixed marriages and the like. At what point do you draw the line when including people in the black group?

It's the same all the world - Dude

Where ever black people go were told the same thing

We don't want you to live here.
We don't want you to work here.
We don't want you to study here.
We don't want you to date her/him.

Even in China, India, Arab world, they hate black people too (for the most part) and have the same anti-black views as any white supremacist.

It's the World vs Black people.

Ok so here you may have touched on part of the previous question as to who do you include in the black group. So basically, the more prevalent the black influence on a mixed race person, regardless of nationality, the lower they are on this totem pole you refer to, right?

Makes no difference. Look at Meghan Markle - She whitest black women ever. That's don't matter

She still get's it from politician in the UK and from white supremacists



Or white supremacist (Danny Baker) ppl who are working at the BBC commenting on her baby



Obama was mixed race. He still got it. And he was well spoken (what ever that means) Pulled his pants up. Stable marriage. No kids out of wedlock. He still got it.

We don't know each other personally, but I suspect we'd have some pretty interesting conversations. I probably wouldn't change your mind about these things, but I would certainly try and inject some perspective from my own background and experience. I've seen racism and bigotry up close and first hand (although thankfully not directed at me)...... and yet I've seen enough to come to certain conclusions that not only differ from yours..... but also differ from probably most people on here.

As I say. I came here to talk boxing because, well, this is a boxing forum after all. And plus I've been banned twice and banning me again is a click of a mouse. So I'm gonna try to stick to boxing topics. But you did reply to me. So I had to respond

[TitoFan]

Ok, so "all" being 100 percent. But you DO make the clarification that #1 you "can't prove it", and #2 you "suspect all". "Suspect" being the key word here which by definition leaves room for error. So basically by your own admission there could possibly be a percentage that are not in fact White Supremacists. Would you agree with that statement?

If you had a 100 snakes coming at you, 99 were venomous, and one wasn't. Would you stop to try and find the non-venomous one ? Or would you close the door on the lot of them ?


But we're not talking venomous snakes, are we. A White Supremacist isn't going to kill you with one bite. If you treat people like you do snakes, there's a huge part of the problem right there.

To clarify, ALL children learn very quickly, but yes.... white children included. But your 2nd sentence must be taken into the context of your earlier statement where you can't "prove" it, and can only "suspect." So there again there might be some room for error. At this point I would ask what percentage error would you say could be possible in your assessment? Just asking because in statements like this people usually throw in a plus or minus.

But here's the thing.

The white supremacists are the most powerful. It doesn't really matter if there is a small % of whites who aren't white supremacist. The ones who have the muscle in the world are the white supremacist.

So here you've cracked the door open to the possibility that not ALL whites are White Supremacists. That in itself is a start, albeit a very small start. About having "muscle in the world"... sure... there are racist whites in positions of power. No argument there. But there are also powerful whites who are far from racist. But I guess this is where you and I will never agree.

You from P.Rico right ? Well I know if I went to Puerto Rico I'd see the white P.Ricans on top and the black P.Ricans would be on the bottom.

See, here's the thing. "IF..... I went to Puerto Rico..." There's always that pesky "IF". Yet I'VE lived here for many decades and yet you dismiss any observations I may have before I've even made them. You're an intelligent fella.... but that is clearly not an intelligent way to establish an argument or dialogue.

Every area in Puerto Rico were black people live would be the poorest area of town, the least invested area of town, the area of highest unemployment. Then I'd go to the jails and they'd be full of black people. I'd go to the best schools, they be full of mainly white P.Ricans, the best houses, jobs, land, property would all be owned by white P.Ricans. The black P.Ricans would living in the mud without a biscuit and they'd be looked down, seen as ugly, worthless, criminal, violent, backward.

Some of what you say may be partly accurate, and some of what you say if pretty ridiculous. But what does it matter when you've already made up your mind about what we have here without ever having set foot on the island. I would tell you about how in some places (like Puerto Rico) the division between black and white isn't as stark as in other places merely because of our ancestry and history, but what would it matter. It would be nice to have a rational conversation with you, but as we've all found out long ago..... that is akin to speaking to a wall and expecting something in return. Sad.

White supremacy is global

And that would true all over S.America. I'd go to Brazil and they just elected a white supremacist president down there, so black Brazillians are gonna catch even more hell. I'd go to Uruguay, Columbia, Ecuador, Panama. Hell - Down there if your black, they'd just do gorilla gestures in the street. There is no filter as far as racism to black people in S.America.

Please tell me how many countries in South America you've visited. Fair question, is it not?

So stop trying to be "the voice of reason", trying to think your kinda smart. I've seen it before many times.

I'm not trying to be "the voice of reason" of trying to pass myself off as anything. I'm merely trying to have a rational conversation with you, as I would if we were face to face. But your tone is rather antagonistic, and I don't see why. You tell others they're insulting and attacking you..... and you're pretty close to doing the same to me.

What I mean is WHO do you include in the group blacks, who according to you is the bottom of the totem pole with regards to White Supremacists? Because there are blacks from different nationalities and origins. Caribbean blacks yes.... their origin is Africa, as there was a very active slave trade way back when which include all of the Caribbean islands. But what about European blacks, or blacks from other continents that may not have originated in Africa? Also, there is the obvious mix over time that results from mixed marriages and the like. At what point do you draw the line when including people in the black group?

It's the same all the world - Dude

Where ever black people go were told the same thing

We don't want you to live here.
We don't want you to work here.
We don't want you to study here.
We don't want you to date her/him.

Even in China, India, Arab world, they hate black people too (for the most part) and have the same anti-black views as any white supremacist.

It's the World vs Black people.

Ok so here you may have touched on part of the previous question as to who do you include in the black group. So basically, the more prevalent the black influence on a mixed race person, regardless of nationality, the lower they are on this totem pole you refer to, right?

Makes no difference. Look at Meghan Markle - She whitest black women ever. That's don't matter

She still get's it from politician in the UK and from white supremacists



Or white supremacist (Danny Baker) ppl who are working at the BBC commenting on her baby



Obama was mixed race. He still got it. And he was well spoken (what ever that means) Pulled his pants up. Stable marriage. No kids out of wedlock. He still got it.

We don't know each other personally, but I suspect we'd have some pretty interesting conversations. I probably wouldn't change your mind about these things, but I would certainly try and inject some perspective from my own background and experience. I've seen racism and bigotry up close and first hand (although thankfully not directed at me)...... and yet I've seen enough to come to certain conclusions that not only differ from yours..... but also differ from probably most people on here.

As I say. I came here to talk boxing because, well, this is a boxing forum after all. And plus I've been banned twice and banning me again is a click of a mouse. So I'm gonna try to stick to boxing topics. But you did reply to me. So I had to respond

Well I appreciate your responding to me, and frankly TBH, I'm of the opinion that:

1. You've had some traumatic experiences as a child or youth that have driven you to think this way (assuming you're not just pulling everyone's chain and it's all one big windup joke).

2. If I were to guess, I'd say you're fairly young..... and by that I'm implying that there's still some time/room for moderating your viewpoints as time goes by. We all mature till we die, so that's no insult (just in case).


You see... there's nothing quite like time to help moderate some of our harsh, extreme viewpoints... especially when we've met people who help us in that process. Not saying I've been of any help, mind you. But I'd bet if you knew me personally (and we're just a bit open to dialogue), I might be able to put my own two cents.

At the very least, none of what I've said to you in this latest exchange is meant to be condescending, hurtful, insulting, or anything of the sort. I hope it's received that way.

[Denilson-The-Comeback]

Well I appreciate your responding to me, and frankly TBH, I'm of the opinion that:

Go on

1. You've had some traumatic experiences as a child or youth that have driven you to think this way (assuming you're not just pulling everyone's chain and it's all one big windup joke).

Nope. Many black people think like me. Bear in mind I'm toning what I say down. There are many black ppl way more extreme than me. You think I'm extreme ? You know nothing.

Don't forget - Black people have to watch what they say around whites. The system of white supremacy protects itself by making the ppl it shit's on dependent on them. So black people (for the most part) are dependent on whites for jobs, houses etc. So whites can put a hurt on black person - real bad - if they start talking like I do.

Most whites are so closed-minded about race and get upset about it so easily that it becomes a waste of breath. Whites shut themselves off from any serious, honest talk about race with blacks. Then, partly from this engineered silence, they conclude that racism is no big deal. That's why your up here all shocked that there are ppl like me (And many more) who think like me

2. If I were to guess, I'd say you're fairly young..... and by that I'm implying that there's still some time/room for moderating your viewpoints as time goes by. We all mature till we die, so that's no insult (just in case)

This is a moderate viewpoint. As for my age. I'm not young nor am I old. I'm 36. Malcolm X was 39 when he died. MLK was 39 when he died. Fred Hampton died at 21. Tupac died at 25. All of them had a deep understanding the system of white supremacy even though they were young. Age don't mean nothing (Not that I'm comparing myself to them)

You see... there's nothing quite like time to help moderate some of our harsh, extreme viewpoints... especially when we've met people who help us in that process. Not saying I've been of any help, mind you. But I'd bet if you knew me personally (and we're just a bit open to dialogue), I might be able to put my own two cents.

When I think of white supremacist (and I've said this many times) I think of Ellen DeGeneres. I think Tom Hanks. I think Angelina Jolie. I think of the most kindest, innocent acting white person out there.

Racism - White Supremacy is not an angry thing.

The likes of David Duke, Richard Spencer, Aryan Nation groups, Dylan Roof are white extremists. They extreme advocates of white supremacy.

Most whites are not that extreme.

As the saying goes, this isn’t personal, it’s business.

I'll respond to the rest later

[Dark Lord Al]

And your sitting there getting all scared and worried about what you think is going in London

***You're***

And nah I'm not bothered by what's happening in London as I don't fucking live there. But I'm troubled as to why a nation attempting to gain access to nuclear material by agreeing to a deal with the United States and England et al would ALSO be building massive bombs in one of the nations they just made that very difficult to achieve deal with....and of course now that deal is gone and Iran is not seen in the best of light.


Also I'm troubled by the reporting of the event being 4-5 years after the fact.


As for the rest of your post 70% since 9/11 ....well in 9/11 almost 3,000 people were killed so I guess the completely subjective date they chose isn't telling of some sort of agenda.

And let's have a look at some of these "domestic terror killings" https://www.adl.org/resources/report...#the-incidents
1. Reston, Virginia, December 22, 2017. An accused white supremacist teenager (as a juvenile, his name is being withheld until/unless he is formally charged as an adult) is reported to have killed the parents of his girlfriend before shooting himself, reportedly because they had convinced their daughter to break up with him because of his ostensible white supremacist beliefs.

-So a white supremacist murders other white people and it's a "domestic terror killing"?

2. Greeley, Colorado, August 16, 2017. Kelly Raisley, believed to be a member or associate of the 211 Crew white supremacist gang, was arrested on first-degree murder charges for the murder of his uncle, Randy Gene Baker. Baker’s wife and sister were similarly arrested. The motive was apparently personal.

- White person kills white person "The motive was apparently personal" yet it's listed as a "domestic terror killing"

3. Samish Island, Washington, July 14, 2017. An alt lite conspiracy theorist and vlogger, Lane Maurice Davis, allegedly murdered his father following an argument over Davis’s beliefs.
- https://www.apnews.com/cb638940becf424e8eefda7519f25fa9 "His public defender Adam Yanasak said his client was in intense emotional distress at the time and that an evaluation by forensic psychiatrist Mark McClung showed that a combination of dissociative disorder and Asperger’s syndrome played a role in Lane Davis’ loss of control." ....yet it's a "domestic terror killing"

4. Century Correctional Institution, Florida, June 19, 2017. Robert Hunt, an inmate with white supremacist tattoos, some common to prison gangs, is accused of stabbing to death an African-American inmate, Jorge Slaughter.
- https://www.pnj.com/story/news/2018/...ath/651823002/ ... "Inmates theorized that Slaughter owed Hunt money, or that the two had been in a dispute over contraband narcotics."....yet this is 100% a "domestic terror killing" according to the ADL

5. Putnam County Georgia, June 13, 2017. Ricky Dubose, a member of the Ghostface Gangsters white supremacist prison gang, and another inmate, Donnie Russell Rowe, reportedly killed two corrections officers while trying to escape from a prison bus. They were later recaptured.
- So they were trying to escape and they killed who was in their way....oh yeah totally a "domestic terror killing"

6. Tampa, Florida, May 19, 2017. White supremacist Devon Arthurs allegedly shot to death two of his roommates for making fun of his recent conversion to Islam. All three, and a fourth roommate, were members of Atomwaffen, a neo-Nazi group.
- So he's listed as a white supremacist, but the motive given was that he was being made fun of by his neo-Nazi buddies for (checks notes) converting to Islam ....sooo is this going to fall under the white or the Islam section?

And these are just a few reasons to ask questions and verify information...there's plenty more to go over but you get the picture (well not you Denny, but the others will)

Just give it up. As I've said b4, your not just flogging a dead horse, your whipping the skeleton. I know your gonna defend your people to the max. I get it.

My point is white people (or should I say and more to the point white supremacists) have been the most violent terroristic ppl ever to walk the earth.

The whole country (USA) was founded on terrorism. All terrorism is caused by white supremacy terrorism. Muslim terrorism wouldn’t exist without white supremacy.

To be fair I feel ever other person one earth are superior to you , personally I think you are a deluded brain washed death cult following peasant.