Quote Originally Posted by Beanz View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
I would prefer their content be donation based. Chaps like Peterson, Akkad, and Watson can likely make plenty that way alone. The audience is global. It also makes it more ideologically pure. I would love the BBC to try the donation route. Can't see them doing it though. Who the fuck decided Gary Lineker was worth so much? Tyranny.
Idealogically Pure? (: Says it all. What you are asking for is a safe space. Nobody more censorious than Peterson. Sueing people left, right and centre and demanding the right to decide what university subjects are acceptable.

His new cult central plans will be by invite only, comments removed if not enough people like them(agree) and be full of his human centipede like bum chums all feeding off and regurgitating each others whinging arse bile.

Lame Central for proud lobster boys.
The concept of funding yourself through donations is indeed ideologically pure. It is in stark contrast to something like the BBC license fee.

At the end of the day if sites like You Tube or Patreon are going to ban people or cut off their income, then what else do you suggest? That they just be silenced? Of course like minded voices who believe they have a right to a voice are going to have to find an alternative.

Peterson should sue you for talking bollocks about him all the time.