Not really Master. Labour will continue to bring in hundreds of thousands who have never contributed and statistically will take from the economy rather than put in thus placing more burden on the system that is already delaying cancer treatments. Only a new party will get serious on all that. If it was a net positive then it would make sense but it is a net loss.

I have nothing but great things to say about my surgeon. They work incredibly long days checking on your well being at the break of dawn, perform 2, 3 or 4 majors surgeries. Check on you again at the end. Then other days they are consulting and often lecturing and publishing too. It is an amazing workload with an incredible amount of responsibility.

In that sense I absolutely believe in a meritocracy and those that contribute most deserve everything they have. Most people cannot do that kind of work. This is why it is important that the most capable end up in the most important positions.

Politics of course is a funny one where people of very average intelligence end up making very bad policies that affect everyone else usually quite negatively. This issue appears to be a case in point.

What the NHS needs is less micromanagement, less bureaucratic nonsense, less health tourism and more resources given to those who do the most important work. Useless jobs are everywhere and government is a place that creates all too many of them. Very wasteful. Then there are the Royals and how much surgery would 2.5 million spent on refurbishing their home provide?