An interesting article, much of which is on the surface true. However, they are clever manipulators. For instance, breaking hate speech rules? Has Facebook ever shown what he was banned for? You Tube themselves admitted he had not broken their rules, but they silenced him anyway. We know the politics and lobbying that led to it though. Why doesn't the BBC talk about that? Agenda is why. Then they rub in his campaign result which wasn't hrlped by that same silencing and a mainstream media that did not report but manipulated. Again, why not talk about that? Agenda. They won't even offer balance and that is because it is fake news
What happened to the Sweeney film? Well, they tried to hush that up and as usual the media had little to say. The UK has,the lowest media trust in Europe. Fact. It is a corrupt media which editorialises rather than reports. The slide is obvious.The BBC also carried out the same 'crime' that Robinson is in prison for. And all he did on that initial day was state what they themselves had put in the public domain.
The BBC license numbers are decreasing and I would argue that the numbers are likely more than they are letting on. Plus what kind of organisation has positions where non whites in an 85% white country cannot apply? Everyone has racism on the brain when it comes to Robinson but look at the BBC.
There is no doubt that we know what has happened in Luton largely because of Tommy Robinson. And what do the BBC want? For the most targeted man in Britain to live on a little cul de sac in a house worth no more than 100,000 pounds to prove gis man of the people status? They would be asking him to commit suicide.
Robinson is smart and able to make money. The BBC is privileged and takes by force. Lineker earns 1.7 million for a crappy highlights program. Who are the BBC to be judging what is suitable living as John Sweeney gulps down expensive alcohol paid for by the public? Robinson is about donations. The BBC is force. Make the BBC voluntary and see how they fare.
Bookmarks