The "Can We Keep it Civil?" Thread

[Denilson-The-Comeback]

I will address your points one by one.

OK. Another white supremacists that will try to masquerade their internal chaos into a form of rationality

1. If you think I think black people are all stupid then you have misunderstood my points

You don’t even have a leg to stand on as long as you don’t deliver a clear definition of what you actually write about.
If you’re saying that physical features determine “race” which exactly are those features ? Applying circular logic, the answer would be “the features group members share based on their region of origin”. And then again, what are those features ?

And no it's not because everyone is the same.

There are persistent and real genetic differences that cluster within so-called racial groups (and more so than many have heretofore believed) Yet these differences still fall far short of indicating sub-speciation, which is the normal standard used by biologists to indicate different “races” or breeds of a larger species.

It has never been a case of there not being differences between the way human beings look. The trouble is in the imprecise taxonomy. How do you define a “race” and might there not be other equally valid ways of dividing humans into taxonomical groupings ?

We acknowledge that human beings adapt to their geography to some extent – but not enough to become different *kinds* of human beings.

Now, if you choose to call the differences in groups “races” it stretches the original meaning of the word.

But let’s accept that for a moment. You want races so badly, then guess what ?

I'll give them to you.

But you’re going to need more races (based on genetic variance) than they culled of in the past centuries. And the races won’t be arbitrarily colour-coordinated. There will be several European races, many Asian races, and a large number of African races.

There is no resistance to accept “race” as a biological concept

The point is, there is no scientific proof for it. Full stop. However, the fact that is truly remarkable in all of this is how keen certain people are on proving the biological validity. Or to see it proven. All that effort would be much better invested in research for genetically based disorders.

It’s also understandable when serious scientists (like me) are sick and fucking tired of debunking guys like you over and over again. After all, I'm busy enough with proper research that might become truly beneficial for mankind.

And how about “White people or "Asians”

They are certainly less genetically diverse than Blacks, but they obviously have genetic variance between say… Scandinavians and Italians or Anglo Saxons and Spaniards… but evidently, those genetic differences are somehow never linked to intelligence ?

Guys like you don't want to theorize on which group of White or Asian people are the least intelligent.

Who are the genetically dumber and disadvantaged Whites ?

If there is enough genetic difference for them to have different hair color, eye color and different average height, then why not intelligence?

The answer is because this is not science, it’s politics and to ask that question does not serve the political goals of guys like you.

You don’t want to face the idea that you might belong to the dumbest group of White or Asian people in your little hierarchy. So you theorize that “Whiteness” or "Asian-ness" simply makes all Whites and Asian just as capable, and all Blacks equally disadvantaged.

2. How would you define dumb?

You are the one who is making the claim. This is why I don't like getting into debates with guys like you because you don't know what the fk you talking

3. You see yourself as inferior whence barking on about the evils of white men day in day out refusing to accept you have agency.

Yes I am inferior. I can't compete with you white man (lol) Your the man. Your so intellectually superior to me I can't compete.

Now what ?

What do you do with a race of inferior black people ?

Is the white man making so many black men abandon their children? Look at the single mother rates 50 years ago and today. Surely you can see that behavior has changed and not just in the black community.

What you are saying is false and a lie and see this is a common thing white supremacist try to do.

They say a lie like "Black people commit 70% of murders" and then they try to get black people to defend that lie



First off can you explain to me why Iceland (One of the whitest countries you can find ? Has the highest rates for father-lesness ?



Why would a white person want to talk about black illegitimacy ? You don't care. Because if you were truly concerned about illegitimacy, you'd also be just as concerned about white illegitimacy too.

Your understanding of the Black community. Out of wedlock birth does not mean what conservative whites project it does in Black households. Most of those children still have two parents that just decided to cohabit instead of marry. That phenomenon isn't just taking place in Black America, some all white European nations also have exceedingly high out of wedlock births.

The same is happening to a lesser degree in the Hispanic and White communities.

This is just "I'm and I say so"

@Gandalf says "The same is happening to a lesser degree in the Hispanic and White communities"

Questioneer "How do you ?"

@Gandalf

Things go wrong when there are no male role models and if the mother is someone prone to making bad decisions, then you have social problems.

Barack Obama was the perfect black man. He had no kids out of wedlock. Happy marriage. Didn't do crime or drugs. Went 2 Harvard. Good role model for kids

And as I've said many times say what you want about his presidency

Him personally ?

There was not 1% of personal scandal on that term throughout his two terms

Did that stop him from getting racism ?

No.

So once again - What point are you trying to make ?

I personally think welfare makes lazy people dependent. Get the cat on a treadmill and earn its food. Don't let it sleep all day.

Well in that case then you should look the white community



The real welfare queens are uneducated single and white and the the biggest beneficiaries of the government safety net is working-class whites also where is your outrage over corporate welfare ? That's where most welfare spending goes all to the top 1%

Once again.

Your talking point sound good on stormfront. They sound good when your around family and friends. They sound good when no-one is there to check them