Lomachenko v Campbell - 31/8/19 UK

[Primo Carnera]

Fury is going to get beat, unless Povetkin has aged and past it, which would probably make Eddie happy.

probably, but props for taking the fight. Dillian Whyte (Pre drug test failure) didn’t want any of it.
By the way , where the fuck is Whyte’s B sample result??

It hasn't even been opened. Instead I presume he presented evidence to a panel. Clear now?

Clear as mud. No clearer for me either mate. More here - https://www.boxinginsider.com/headli...-wasnt-opened/

Cheers for the update. What a complete load of bollocks.

[Fenster]

Not sure where the value lies with Loma-Campbell but why is the little mexican who chinned Selby a 5/2 shot against Charlie Edwards? If he was a 14-1-0 (11 KOs), 23-year-old Mexican I would consider backing him blind at those those odds (the strength-in-depth, for little men, in Mexico/South America and Asia is much stronger than Europe and USA). However, he has a couple of solid wins as well as a serious one over Selby (looked a right little hard bastard, vicious body shots).

Julio Cesar Martinez Aguilar - 5/2 (10 returns 35)

[Beanz]

The live press conference will be streamed here shortly - https://www.skysports.com/boxing/new...ess-conference

[smashup]

Campbell's only chance is to plant his feet and go for the KO non stop.
Lomachenko beats him in every department but he's been put on his ass before so it's not impossible.
I honestly think Campbell does alot better than people are saying here.

[Fenster]

Fury-Povetkin doesn't make sense. Why would Fury (his dad) take Povetkin for his first fight with Eddie/Sky? I'd back Fury to do an Errol Flynn/Usain Bolt at 5/2 if I wasn't afraid of an "injury" job. A pomp Povetkin wins easy.

25/1 draw (10 returns 260).

[imp]

Fury telegraph his punches..not enough snap..he will be circling and dancing all night with zero power shots.

Both drug cheats anyway.

[Beanz]

weigh in here -

[Ron Swanson]

Not sure where the value lies with Loma-Campbell but why is the little mexican who chinned Selby a 5/2 shot against Charlie Edwards? If he was a 14-1-0 (11 KOs), 23-year-old Mexican I would consider backing him blind at those those odds (the strength-in-depth, for little men, in Mexico/South America and Asia is much stronger than Europe and USA). However, he has a couple of solid wins as well as a serious one over Selby (looked a right little hard bastard, vicious body shots).

Julio Cesar Martinez Aguilar - 5/2 (10 returns 35)

The “strength-in-depth, for little men, in Mexico/South America” is in the USA.

[Fenster]

Not sure where the value lies with Loma-Campbell but why is the little mexican who chinned Selby a 5/2 shot against Charlie Edwards? If he was a 14-1-0 (11 KOs), 23-year-old Mexican I would consider backing him blind at those those odds (the strength-in-depth, for little men, in Mexico/South America and Asia is much stronger than Europe and USA). However, he has a couple of solid wins as well as a serious one over Selby (looked a right little hard bastard, vicious body shots).

Julio Cesar Martinez Aguilar - 5/2 (10 returns 35)

The “strength-in-depth, for little men, in Mexico/South America” is in the USA.

Registered Flyweights (the specific weight for this bout)

USA - 20

Latin America - 197

[Batman]

Anna looking lovely as usual

[Master]

Anna looking lovely as usual

Missed you. Stop saving the world and relax by watching some boxing.

[Master]

Cordina is fast and super sharp in the 1st round against his opponent.

1 nil Cordina.

[Ron Swanson]

Not sure where the value lies with Loma-Campbell but why is the little mexican who chinned Selby a 5/2 shot against Charlie Edwards? If he was a 14-1-0 (11 KOs), 23-year-old Mexican I would consider backing him blind at those those odds (the strength-in-depth, for little men, in Mexico/South America and Asia is much stronger than Europe and USA). However, he has a couple of solid wins as well as a serious one over Selby (looked a right little hard bastard, vicious body shots).

Julio Cesar Martinez Aguilar - 5/2 (10 returns 35)

The “strength-in-depth, for little men, in Mexico/South America” is in the USA.

Registered Flyweights (the specific weight for this bout)

USA - 20

Latin America - 197

This is really quite simple, most everyone already gets this but it seems you are behind in class so let me explain this very very simple thing.... the good Latin American fighters come to the USA. If there are any other very very simple things you need explained to you, don’t lie, stick to asking, it’s better for everyone.

[Fenster]

Not sure where the value lies with Loma-Campbell but why is the little mexican who chinned Selby a 5/2 shot against Charlie Edwards? If he was a 14-1-0 (11 KOs), 23-year-old Mexican I would consider backing him blind at those those odds (the strength-in-depth, for little men, in Mexico/South America and Asia is much stronger than Europe and USA). However, he has a couple of solid wins as well as a serious one over Selby (looked a right little hard bastard, vicious body shots).

Julio Cesar Martinez Aguilar - 5/2 (10 returns 35)

The “strength-in-depth, for little men, in Mexico/South America” is in the USA.

Registered Flyweights (the specific weight for this bout)

USA - 20

Latin America - 197

This is really quite simple, most everyone already gets this but it seems you are behind in class so let me explain this very very simple thing.... the good Latin American fighters come to the USA. If there are any other very very simple things you need explained to you, don’t lie, stick to asking, it’s better for everyone.

Behind in class? I'm the muthafukkin Teacher.

Lets look at The Ring magazine top ten flyweights - 4 Japanese - 2 Latin Americans - 2 Brits - 1 South African - 1 Ukraine - 0 USA.

By your rationale, the two Latinos will have fought, be based, learnt their trade or ply their trade in the USA, right? They've had 48 fights between them, zero in the USA. Neither are based or live there. In fact, between the entire top ten a grand total of two fights have been in the USA.

So my question is - do you understand the meaning of "strength in depth?"

[Ron Swanson]

Not sure where the value lies with Loma-Campbell but why is the little mexican who chinned Selby a 5/2 shot against Charlie Edwards? If he was a 14-1-0 (11 KOs), 23-year-old Mexican I would consider backing him blind at those those odds (the strength-in-depth, for little men, in Mexico/South America and Asia is much stronger than Europe and USA). However, he has a couple of solid wins as well as a serious one over Selby (looked a right little hard bastard, vicious body shots).

Julio Cesar Martinez Aguilar - 5/2 (10 returns 35)

The “strength-in-depth, for little men, in Mexico/South America” is in the USA.

Registered Flyweights (the specific weight for this bout)

USA - 20

Latin America - 197

This is really quite simple, most everyone already gets this but it seems you are behind in class so let me explain this very very simple thing.... the good Latin American fighters come to the USA. If there are any other very very simple things you need explained to you, don’t lie, stick to asking, it’s better for everyone.

Behind in class? I'm the muthafukkin Teacher.

Lets look at The Ring magazine top ten flyweights - 4 Japanese - 2 Latin Americans - 2 Brits - 1 South African - 1 Ukraine - 0 USA.

By your rationale, the two Latinos will have fought, be based, learnt their trade or ply their trade in the USA, right? They've had 48 fights between them, zero in the USA. Neither are based or live there. In fact, between the entire top ten a grand total of two fights have been in the USA.

So my question is - do you understand the meaning of "strength in depth?"

You and I are having two different conversations, mine, honest, yours, as usual addressing something I didn’t say. Because you are dishonest, every post. I shouldn’t need to quote myself to point out how you are being dishonest because it’s in the thread right above my post. But, since you are always a f’n liar. I’ll quote myself for your dumb ass to see. And quote you to show how you switched it because you are a f’n liar. Every, single, time.

You said, copy and paste by the way so don’t change things you f’n liar “(the strength-in-depth, for little men, in Mexico/South America and Asia is much stronger than Europe and USA”

And I said, copy and paste so don’t change things you f’n liar “The “strength-in-depth, for little men, in Mexico/South America” is in the USA.”

I’m addressing “little men” as the conversation you were having addressed. My comment is undeniable truth. The best from Latin America come to the USA. Fact.

So you change the conversation by narrowing it down, something dishonest people do. I didn’t need to change the conversation from “little men” the conversation you began, to a different one. You did. Because you are a f’n liar. It’s what liars do. So, when I correct you, please in the future, don’t bother with your dishonesty. Every person with an ounce of intelligence sees through all your BS.

As a bonus, your “strength-in-depth” that you ask if I know what it means. Well, no. Because strength-in-depth” is not a thing. I speak English. If you want to ask if I know what strength in depth means ask. Speak the language. If you wonder why I point out your poor English it’s because of you simply said “the strength in depth at flyweight is in Mexico/Latin America and Asia” in the beginning it wouldn’t have been so wildly inaccurate to the point of absurdity as you always do. And I think you make your messages wildly inaccurate to the point of absurdity on purpose. You know your boys will let you backtrack and change everything around. But I’m here to call you on your BS. Every time I see you lie I will point out it’s a lie. So every post you make I will be there with facts. And every post everyone will watch you change what you said. And eventually you will have to be honest.