Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28

Thread: Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    710
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz

    I hate Matts attitude, but this BJ Penn bandwagon bullshit is out of control.

    And the whole rib thing makes me even more pissed. If your in a fight, and you get hurt then thats part of losing. Part of this whole thing is about durability. BJ didn't come in with this injury......this is damage he took in the fight so why the fuck is everyone using this as an excuse for BJ?

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    710
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz

    As far as Ken and Tito goes.........well you're 42 and you're not Randy Couture...what do you expect Ken??

    You made your mark and your place in UFC history will be secured forever...you probably would have handed Tito his ass 12 years ago but it's time.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Guatemala, Guatemala
    Posts
    579
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1053
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz

    Pulling/Straining a rib IS an excuse for why he lost. Doesn't take away from Matts win, because a win is a win is a win, but it doesn't make Matt a better fighter, but BJ a worse. Matts performace was terrible until BJ hurt himself, and then he took EXCELLENT advantage of it.
    Boxing is like a handjob, and MMA is like a hot sweaty orgy with 5 chicks. I could never say no to a handjob, but which would you rather have?

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    710
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz

    My point is that being a fighter requires that you have durability. Everyone is making it sound like it had nothing to do with fighing Matt. I think it's fair to say that Matt seperated his ribs just by being too strong for BJ. I will totally admit that it really didn't look good for Matt in the outset BUT
    Since when is being fragile in a fight an excuse?

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,788
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1203
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz

    Quote Originally Posted by mucho testosterone
    My point is that being a fighter requires that you have durability. Everyone is making it sound like it had nothing to do with fighing Matt. I think it's fair to say that Matt seperated his ribs just by being too strong for BJ. I will totally admit that it really didn't look good for Matt in the outset BUT
    Since when is being fragile in a fight an excuse?
    Depends on if Matt caused the injury and took advantage of it. But nobody gives Byrd the credit for beating Vitali now do they
    Life is still worth while If You Just Smile - MJ

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    710
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz

    Quote Originally Posted by Majesty
    Quote Originally Posted by mucho testosterone
    My point is that being a fighter requires that you have durability. Everyone is making it sound like it had nothing to do with fighing Matt. I think it's fair to say that Matt seperated his ribs just by being too strong for BJ. I will totally admit that it really didn't look good for Matt in the outset BUT
    Since when is being fragile in a fight an excuse?
    Depends on if Matt caused the injury and took advantage of it. But nobody gives Byrd the credit for beating Vitali now do they
    BJ got his ass beat. sorry

  7. #22
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Guatemala, Guatemala
    Posts
    579
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1053
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz

    Watching the fight and taking BJs word for it, he injured himself taking Matt's back. As you watch, you can see that he really bends himself very awkwardly taking his back, so it seems like a legit pull to me, and one caused by himself moreso than Matt. Like I said...I still give him credit for surviving the first two rounds (albeit barely in the second round ) and being able to capitalize on BJs injury. BJ injured could probably still wipe out the majority of the UFC WW division.
    Boxing is like a handjob, and MMA is like a hot sweaty orgy with 5 chicks. I could never say no to a handjob, but which would you rather have?

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    710
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz

    I don't know man........we'll see how eager BJ is for that rematch.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,788
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1203
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz

    Quote Originally Posted by mucho testosterone
    Quote Originally Posted by Majesty
    Quote Originally Posted by mucho testosterone
    My point is that being a fighter requires that you have durability. Everyone is making it sound like it had nothing to do with fighing Matt. I think it's fair to say that Matt seperated his ribs just by being too strong for BJ. I will totally admit that it really didn't look good for Matt in the outset BUT
    Since when is being fragile in a fight an excuse?
    Depends on if Matt caused the injury and took advantage of it. But nobody gives Byrd the credit for beating Vitali now do they
    BJ got his ass beat. sorry
    Check Heavy D's post The injury was legit and one that BJ caused on himself
    Life is still worth while If You Just Smile - MJ

  10. #25
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Guatemala, Guatemala
    Posts
    579
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1053
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz

    Yeah...to paraphrase, he basically seperated one of his ribs from his sternum and tore the connecting tissue (ligaments i think in this case, or are they tendons?) or something to that effect. It's considered a fracture even though technically no bone has been broken. It was caused by the strain from bending at that angle I mentioned when taking his back.


    So like I said, I still give Hughes credit for taking advantage of the injury, just not for causing it. And kudos to Penn for sticking through the injury and STILL almost winning the fight.
    Boxing is like a handjob, and MMA is like a hot sweaty orgy with 5 chicks. I could never say no to a handjob, but which would you rather have?

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,788
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1203
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz

    Shamrock vs. Otriz I Bad Blood

    Shamrock vs. Ortiz II Rivals

    Shamrock vs. Ortix III Total Redundancy
    Life is still worth while If You Just Smile - MJ

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    710
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz

    Like I said....lets just see how eager BJ is to step back in the ring with Hughes.


    BJ did it by himself?? WTF?? no, he did it fighting an opponent. He wasn't surfing, or playing raquetball, or video games or whathaveyou...he was in the middle of a struggle with another opponent and he broke!

    Plain and simple. His body failed under pressure while fighting someone else....simple concept to me.

    Now If you were one of the fans who did want to see BJ win, then the news about the seperated rib was an early christmas present because it gives you an excuse for the ugly nature in which that fight was finished by Hughes. Lets' be realistic here, there were punches and bodies clashing in the ring. Why didn't Hughes seperate a rib

    Why didn't he tap out after that traingle attempt at the of round 2??

    Why didn't he go down after getting popped on the chin by BJ for the first round

    The answer lies in durability friends....these guys are FIGHTERS, and not boxers but MIXED MARTIAL ARTS FIGHTERS....there is grappling and durability is a prerequisite.

    Dude got his ass kicked. He was getting popped in the head over and over and over.......until it was stopped. Thats it. Simple.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Guatemala, Guatemala
    Posts
    579
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1053
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz

    If by "dude" you mean "Matt Hughes" then absolutely. Why can't you face the fact that Matt Hughes looked like a red headed stepchild after thirsty thursday? BJ Penn absolutely dominated Hughes for two rounds. He outstruck the hell out of him, made a complete mockery of his takedown attempts, and damned near submitted him. It wasn't until his OWN actions caused him to injure himself that Matt was able to do anything (and not even then...he needed the round to end to turn his luck around).

    After Hughes was injured, Hughes STILL couldn't knock him out, despite the fact that he was a friggin punching bag. He was flat footed with his hands down and essentially LETTING Hughes tee off on him. When he had Penn down in the crucifix-esque mount, he STILL couldn't finish the fight....he just "pummeled" him with weak shots until the ref called the fight....BJ most likely could have survived another three or so minutes of that and come out for another round.

    Hughes put on a terrible performance, and only won because of a freak injury. His body DID fail under pressure, but that has nothing to do with "durability." That's like calling someone weak for rolling their ankle and it hurting. It's just a freak accident that happens and hurts. And if BJs durability shows anywhere, its the fact that he STILL almost managed to submit Hughes after being injured, and STILL came into the ring for the third round with the injury, and Hughes STILL couldn't knock him out standing and STILL couldn't submit him on the ground. His shots were NOT hurting Penn in any serious way. Penn should have been out cold or tapping at the end of that fight, not ref stoppage. Hughes had NO reason not to conclusively finish that fight against an injured opponent.

    So by your reasoning, this fight shows that both fighters were durable and both were unable to finish the fight, making them both great fighters and terrible at the same time.
    Boxing is like a handjob, and MMA is like a hot sweaty orgy with 5 chicks. I could never say no to a handjob, but which would you rather have?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing