Re: Why I’m hard on Loma, fair or foul?

Originally Posted by
powerpuncher
I can see both sides, but I lean more on the side of waiting for a title shot. The reason why is that there are many other fighters who have been fighting professionally for 5+ years and built their way up to it. It’s unfair to just skip them all.
Another thing is that once you become a star, you start to be able to call the shots. As a fighter, you should have to get through at least 10 guys in order to earn that right.
You can claim that Loma was on that level, but there will always be fringe contenders that give up and comers tough fights. For example, Salido was more known as a fringe contender but through a lot of grit, he won a belt. He could have easily remained a fringe contender. Imagine Loma still fought Salido but Salido didn’t have a belt. Now the story changes. It isn’t that he fought for a title on his second fight but came up short. The story now is that he stepped up a little too soon and needs a few more tune up fights before he fights for a title.
My point is that all fighters should go through a period where they have to fight contenders. I don’t think it’s fair that Loma got to skip all of those contenders that are fighting for their lives to get that shot at the title. There is no guarantee that he would have come out without a loss. Maybe he wouldn’t have, but we should have been able to see how it would have played out.
For sure, in an ideal world that's how boxing would work, everyone would get a fair shake, there'd be a perfect ranking system, unfortunately it's not like that, never has been and never will.
Loma didn't "skip" any contenders, he beat a top ten ranked WBO fighter therefore EARNT his spot in their rankings. Salido, as champion, could have "chosen" anyone in the top 15, he "chose" Loma for obvious reasons.
If Salido wasn't the champion they obviously wouldn't have fought.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Bookmarks