Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  3
Likes Likes:  11
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 52

Thread: Should England ban private schools

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    66,839
    Mentioned
    1702 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3134
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should England ban private schools

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Hadn't posted here yet, as the topic is none of my concern, but simply taken at face value...... why and for what reason should private schools be "banned"?? Shouldn't types of schooling be strictly a choice?
    That is the crux of the debate parental choice to send their children to schools of their choice versus all schools should have the same high standards and thus allow equal social mobility for the most deprived of children.
    Are scholarships not a thing? I know the whole "But what about the poor kids?" deal is an issue in regards to private schools, but in America there are scholarships. The ONLY thing that irks those against Private Schooling more is that the private schools that are cream of the crop aren't 100% scholarships. Which kind of begs the question "How then do you run the school?" the public schools take the tax money so that's out of the question. And they take the tax money(property taxes) even if your kid goes to private school or if you don't even have a kid sooooo there's that.
    This was originally about private schools not being allowed to be taxed and Labour wanted to take that right away.

    There are scholarships but not that common.

    Pupils from the private schools dominate the elite universities and that is another thing that needs addressing which could be done by abolishing these schools.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  2. #2
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Should England ban private schools

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    This was originally about private schools not being allowed to be taxed and Labour wanted to take that right away.

    There are scholarships but not that common.

    Pupils from the private schools dominate the elite universities and that is another thing that needs addressing which could be done by abolishing these schools.
    I'm almost at a loss for how to respond to a post that doesn't contain virulent acrimony towards me personally.



    Thank you, for not getting offended and worked up into a blind rage by my innocuous post Master, I do appreciate it. Private schools in the United States aren't taxed or are taxed a whole bunch, due to how they fund their institutions: donations and tuition. Just an odd question here, but why should private schools be taxed? What problem or issue does that solve?

    Well yeah obviously scholarships will be rare, it's like owning a movie theater and a few kids can't afford a ticket for one of their friends, but you give them a deal which means the rest of the movie going public cover the cost of that ticket either through ticket sales or concessions. In order to keep things going you can't just give away tickets for free.


    Yeah, well a lot of those guys are absolutely worthless and a lot of folks who come from other universities or what have you are absolutely brilliant at their jobs. Look at American politics loads of Presidents and Presidential candidates from the Ivy League, a lot of legacies who are accepted not even on their own academic standings...sometimes there's a privilege with that sort of things, other times it's a weight on the shoulders of people who don't want or appreciate it. Really depends on the individual and what they decide to do with themselves.

    Some extraordinarily wealthy people have great kids and they work hard and they have a chip on their shoulder trying to prove they got there on their own. Others are worthless bastards who spend more time losing the wealth their parents built up than adding to it or society. Same as anything else, not 100% great not 100% evil, there's both good and shitty middle class and poor people too....I don't understand what is so shocking about that concept.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    25,157
    Mentioned
    951 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1411
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should England ban private schools

    Quote Originally Posted by El Kabong View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    This was originally about private schools not being allowed to be taxed and Labour wanted to take that right away.

    There are scholarships but not that common.

    Pupils from the private schools dominate the elite universities and that is another thing that needs addressing which could be done by abolishing these schools.
    I'm almost at a loss for how to respond to a post that doesn't contain virulent acrimony towards me personally.



    Thank you, for not getting offended and worked up into a blind rage by my innocuous post Master, I do appreciate it. Private schools in the United States aren't taxed or are taxed a whole bunch, due to how they fund their institutions: donations and tuition. Just an odd question here, but why should private schools be taxed? What problem or issue does that solve?

    Well yeah obviously scholarships will be rare, it's like owning a movie theater and a few kids can't afford a ticket for one of their friends, but you give them a deal which means the rest of the movie going public cover the cost of that ticket either through ticket sales or concessions. In order to keep things going you can't just give away tickets for free.


    Yeah, well a lot of those guys are absolutely worthless and a lot of folks who come from other universities or what have you are absolutely brilliant at their jobs. Look at American politics loads of Presidents and Presidential candidates from the Ivy League, a lot of legacies who are accepted not even on their own academic standings...sometimes there's a privilege with that sort of things, other times it's a weight on the shoulders of people who don't want or appreciate it. Really depends on the individual and what they decide to do with themselves.

    Some extraordinarily wealthy people have great kids and they work hard and they have a chip on their shoulder trying to prove they got there on their own. Others are worthless bastards who spend more time losing the wealth their parents built up than adding to it or society. Same as anything else, not 100% great not 100% evil, there's both good and shitty middle class and poor people too....I don't understand what is so shocking about that concept.

    Ha!

    Like your President
    Hidden Content

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Should Boxing be taught in schools?
    By THE THIRD MAN in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-28-2008, 02:44 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing