That conclusion suffers from a lack of parallelism.
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 5
Dislikes: 2
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Have some lunatic fringe elements taken over the humanities?
That conclusion suffers from a lack of parallelism.
Rolling the dice
Array
Re: Have some lunatic fringe elements taken over the humanities?
It's all there, you were wrong.Originally Posted by Fatboxingfan
They live, We sleep
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Have some lunatic fringe elements taken over the humanities?
Invalid enthymeme.It's all there, you were wrong.
Rolling the dice
Array
Re: Have some lunatic fringe elements taken over the humanities?
You were wrong.Invalid enthymeme.It's all there, you were wrong.
They live, We sleep
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Have some lunatic fringe elements taken over the humanities?
You're just using the negative form of a universal affirmative, which is invalid, B.You were wrong.Invalid enthymeme.It's all there, you were wrong.
Rolling the dice
Array
Re: Have some lunatic fringe elements taken over the humanities?
"There are no 200,000 properties since 1990" This is incorrect.You're just using the negative form of a universal affirmative, which is invalid, B.You were wrong.Invalid enthymeme.It's all there, you were wrong.
They live, We sleep
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Have some lunatic fringe elements taken over the humanities?
That lacks parallelism. And suffers wildly from the particular affirmative fallacy.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks