Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
Define cruelty. Molyneux argues that violence should not be practiced on children and that people should display agency in their lives. I don't really agree with everything, but he says a lot of useful things. The data might sometimes be harsh, but it is a fact that we are different and outcomes will not all be the same. Nothing terribly cruel in arguing one needn't have a relationship with abusive parents or that single motherhood is largely a choice made by poor decision making and a lack of responsibility. Why would you do that if you are a good person? You just don't like the views therefore jump to 'psychopath'. Your go to is aggression to fit the black and white baddie narrative.
Listen to yourself. You are incredibly easily led by snake oil salesmen and have been for years. Here you are in a thread about AI suggesting that I am the polarizing factor and that Milo and Stefan are somehow reasonable and useful. There is no aggression in my post, only that which you superimpose onto it to avoid facing the reality that you have a bit of a thing for cruel camp men. Amazing how he has you and El Kabong running to defend him as though he has nothing to do with bringing his own twisted enterprise down. Fuck him because the bloke is a nasty fuck. You don't have to be partisan to see that, you have to be partisan to avoid seeing it. Ironically AI algorithms have found you so very easy to steer into the alt right net that you are now a fully signed up climate denying Trumptard and are railing against other people who refuse to be so easily manipulated.