Thanks: 0
Likes: 7
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
Array
Array
Array
Huh? étrange logique, très dérangeant, avec énormes délires, qu'impliquez-vous? pas drôle.
Array
No one in the forum vote now wants Loma vs. Haney. He needs to line up. It is very difficult to have no conflicts for dispute
I feel like it would have just been better for Loma to have dropped the belt. It’s an insult to everybody involved for this kind of elevation. If Loma wants to fight the winner of Commey and Lopez then Davis, I have no problem with him just dropping the belt.
That’s one of the many problems with these belts. You are forced to drop belts because there are other fights to take.
He didn’t need to drop the belt, he was cleared to fight the Commey/Lopez winner then he would have been forced to fight Haney. They requested(and don’t let people lie about this, it was not bestowed on him, they REQUESTED it) it because they didn’t want to fight him at all. It had nothing to do with being free to fight the Commey/Lopez winner. He was free to become undisputed and chose to give that opportunity up rather than fight Haney after. And that’s the point, ESPN has shown they are quite comfortable lying, don’t let them.
I should point out, they put in this duck request MONTHS AGO when Haney started saying he was coming for them. Now that he’s here boom, franchise! We need to acknowledge the horse crap this is
Last edited by Ron Swanson; 11-02-2019 at 12:03 AM.
Array
The more they hand out trinkets like free stale black coffee at auto dealerships the easier it is to ignore them. Save the brain cells and don't jump through the hoops. To me, if there are multiple belt holders within the same organizations ranks..clearly there is a dispute. These clowns want to have it both ways and every way that pays. That said Haney is a very young 20 yrs old and has hardly faced two way traffic. Kid has his entire promising future ahead of him and cheap belts will come and go. Demand quality fights stay humble and do work.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks