He stayed with the party that opened the borders, has no plan to close the borders, and is thus at a dead end with voters in that regard. He also flip flopped on Brexit and the referendum. Tied by an awful party of course, so why would you vote for an awful party. There is no reason why a party cannot be stronger on immigration AND have sensible economic policies. Free Internet for all is one of the most pointless nationalizations ever, so that isn't exactly helping. Can people not afford the Internet now? Just weird. Trains fine, but Labour is getting silly. People have enough with the minimum wage, so how about cutting VAT or something sensible? How about doing away with taxes that hurt the poor the most. I think there is something to be said for letting you keep what you earn and making your own decisions with your money. It is good to give ordinary people agency and choice and that way they can choose poverty or to make a few better decisions. It is the same with their weight and all of that. All choices, good or bad.
They could learn a lot from here when it came to electing a left wing leader who bought votes with candy offerings......the economy sank. And all that promise to increase wages resulted in many jobs being axed or mechanized. There is something called moderation and the trouble with politics is that people will say and do anything to get in without thinking through the long term consequences. The Tories too as more money for the NHS is like sinking money into a black hole. If there is not enough housing there is a good reason for it, but nobody wants to hear it.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 



Reply With Quote

Bookmarks