India is choking to death - why isnt Greta over there?

[Gandalf]

I agree with Beanz here (shocker) Ad hominem is weak. Once you resort to it you have already lost. Attack the argument. Use the science. Simple.

Posture is very important though and they tell you to pull back your shoulders for a reason. I am guilty sometimes too. I record some of my work and notice when I lean over to listen. I do it too, but with no anger and not so hunched. Year in year out it isn't good whence me doing daily stretches. It doesn't help that I am in the top 1% in terms of global height.

She shouldn't get like that too often and if she has wanted to die over things that have never affected her then she needs mental help. I wish her well and hope she gets a job and finds a degree of normality. Turning the world Communist might please her, but it isn't what most people want, and we do not always get what we want. Unless we are Castro and he didn't seem to share that well.

One of the things a young person needs to learn is that life is tough and she has not had a tough life yet. Pampered.

[Fatboxingfan]

Said like a true skinny fucker economic migrant.

[Alpha]

I agree with Beanz here (shocker) Ad hominem is weak. Once you resort to it you have already lost. Attack the argument. Use the science. Simple.

Posture is very important though and they tell you to pull back your shoulders for a reason. I am guilty sometimes too. I record some of my work and notice when I lean over to listen. I do it too, but with no anger and not so hunched. Year in year out it isn't good whence me doing daily stretches. It doesn't help that I am in the top 1% in terms of global height.

She shouldn't get like that too often and if she has wanted to die over things that have never affected her then she needs mental help. I wish her well and hope she gets a job and finds a degree of normality. Turning the world Communist might please her, but it isn't what most people want, and we do not always get what we want. Unless we are Castro and he didn't seem to share that well.

One of the things a young person needs to learn is that life is tough and she has not had a tough life yet. Pampered.

Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"),[1] short for argumentum ad hominem, typically refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.

It's simple enough to destroy climate change using actual science. It is all by design through weather warfare.

[Fatboxingfan]

I agree with Beanz here (shocker) Ad hominem is weak. Once you resort to it you have already lost. Attack the argument. Use the science. Simple.

Posture is very important though and they tell you to pull back your shoulders for a reason. I am guilty sometimes too. I record some of my work and notice when I lean over to listen. I do it too, but with no anger and not so hunched. Year in year out it isn't good whence me doing daily stretches. It doesn't help that I am in the top 1% in terms of global height.

She shouldn't get like that too often and if she has wanted to die over things that have never affected her then she needs mental help. I wish her well and hope she gets a job and finds a degree of normality. Turning the world Communist might please her, but it isn't what most people want, and we do not always get what we want. Unless we are Castro and he didn't seem to share that well.

One of the things a young person needs to learn is that life is tough and she has not had a tough life yet. Pampered.

Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"),[1] short for argumentum ad hominem, typically refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.

It's simple enough to destroy climate change using actual science. It is all by design through weather warfare.

Haha there's a good one. You're trying to teach @Gandalf who is an English teacher about the history of language? It doesn't get much richer than that.

[walrus]

I agree with Beanz here (shocker) Ad hominem is weak. Once you resort to it you have already lost. Attack the argument. Use the science. Simple.

Posture is very important though and they tell you to pull back your shoulders for a reason. I am guilty sometimes too. I record some of my work and notice when I lean over to listen. I do it too, but with no anger and not so hunched. Year in year out it isn't good whence me doing daily stretches. It doesn't help that I am in the top 1% in terms of global height.

She shouldn't get like that too often and if she has wanted to die over things that have never affected her then she needs mental help. I wish her well and hope she gets a job and finds a degree of normality. Turning the world Communist might please her, but it isn't what most people want, and we do not always get what we want. Unless we are Castro and he didn't seem to share that well.

One of the things a young person needs to learn is that life is tough and she has not had a tough life yet. Pampered.

Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"),[1] short for argumentum ad hominem, typically refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.

It's simple enough to destroy climate change using actual science. It is all by design through weather warfare.

Yes alpha you gave many examples on that in the flat earth files we all know you are well skilled at it

[Fatboxingfan]

Walrus, you're avoiding the tangible substance clinging to the surface of a sphere

[walrus]

Walrus, you're avoiding the tangible substance clinging to the surface of a sphere

I’m not avoiding it I see it everyday and occasionally swim in it

[Beanz]

Madrid last night. 500 000 people took to the streets

[Fatboxingfan]

Spain is a big polluter? 🤔🤨🤔🤨🤔

Next step Beijing China? 🤔🤨🤔🤨🤔

[palmerq]

Madrid last night. 500 000 people took to the streets

Bloody ell, good job greta.

[Alpha]

Walrus, you're avoiding the tangible substance clinging to the surface of a sphere

I’m not avoiding it I see it everyday and occasionally swim in it

You do see it everyday, it is a natural tangible substance.

Can you provide a physical practical demonstration/ experiment showing a large body of standing water with the surface naturally displaying convex?

You do understand what pseudoscience is right?



You'll ramble with nonsense as usual, so don't expect a reply from me. Just a practical demonstration is all that is required.

[walrus]

Walrus, you're avoiding the tangible substance clinging to the surface of a sphere

I’m not avoiding it I see it everyday and occasionally swim in it

You do see it everyday, it is a natural tangible substance.

Can you provide a physical practical demonstration/ experiment showing a large body of standing water with the surface naturally displaying convex?

You do understand what pseudoscience is right?



You'll ramble with nonsense as usual, so don't expect a reply from me. Just a practical demonstration is all that is required.

yup sure alpha you got all the true info we are just brainwashed sheep. And you know damn well plenty of people haven’t even seen the ocean so it doesn’t exist to them, they can’t reproduce a model of it.