Why always "middle ground"? Middle ground in an of itself is no particular sign of civility or sophistication or what have you. Its just what it is: MIDDLE GROUND. And some might say (erm, not necessarily meaning ME with my "anti-PC bullshit"..... ) SOME might well say that taking that middle ground approach could be a sign of waffling and indecision and failure to really take a stand on a PARTICULAR (not ALL, lest it gets inferred that I mean ALL) issue. Not saying that's what anyone here is doing (won't say it's "middle ground bullshit" in retailation, either) but hey, let's be honest, Tito has very often taken that middle ground approach, and it is, after all, a realtive safer position to take as you can swiftly step gingerly over that line that separates the "black" and the "white" perspectives. It also gets a bit boring always taking the middle ground, and there's def plenty of times that middle ground will be the best stance, case by case basis really, but Baltimore?? I think the residents already fucking KNOW its a goddam rat infested cess pool and prolly are fucking GLAD that Trump is exposing that to the nation, because hey, maybe its just me, but Trump has brought this to national attention and if I were a resident of Baltimore, dealing with rats and rodents and cockroaches, bed bugs, RECORD HOMICIDE LEVELS, drugs, etc., I think I'd care alot more that he steps in and fixes what the Dems have done to that place, rather than (wait for it..........) get INSULTED by Trump telling the truth.

But again hey, its all how we look at the world. No Bullshit Zone.