Quote Originally Posted by mikeeod View Post
Echols, Brewer, and Robert Allen were all similar fighters in my opinion. All three were dangerous in certain regards but also had glaring holes in their game, which made them exciting fighters to watch on ESPN shows but hindered/prevented them from beating top tier champs. I feel that the gap in boxing today isn’t so much at the highest level of fighters (superstars), but rather at this level that resides just below. This is the level that really drives the sport in my opinion, as casual fans remain engaged watching exciting fights for free while waiting for PPV/Superfight level events.
Really good point and makes perfects sense. Boxing is indeed about levels and imo we get fooled into thinking that all 'great' must see action only happens when we have to drop repeated money for it or sit through all the pomp and circumstances. We're like monkeys or toddlers at times..we like bright lights and shiny objects . Meanwhile you have consistent very capable top talent churning with each other on any giving night and sometimes they produce that under the radar classic. The 'honest' non diva fighters for lack of a better description . It's never more true than with a guy like The Hatchet. The fact he excelled off of a hellacious early 90's run that saw him befuddled and boxed by some 30+ loss guy back to back and then freakishly ko'd back to back speaks to the difference between stroked stars and guys required to earn their way back. I thought he beat Ottke and he retired an all time great in Graham. Seem to recall him hurting Calzaghe bad in the body but I don't want to get that war started. I'd have to rate Allen a level below both he and Echols but only because they didn't lay on the canvas and get caught by the ref staring up and trying to fake it with Hopkins .